Funny how 31000 scientists disagree with global warming

You don't need to mention him directly, all your scientists are in his pocket.

All my scientists?

Including the ones in every other country in the world?

When will you get it through your thick skull that the melting of the polar ice cap and almost all of the glacers IN THE WORLD is not a political issue?
Hypocrite

You really have lost it. You have nothing left except personal attacks.

How sad.

The country has totally repudiated your philosophy.
 
You really have lost it.

It must suck to be a Republican right now.

Like eating a shit sandwich.

Hypocrite and you can't hide it....

So why you are eating that chicken sandwich think about the damage your doing to planet earth. You hypocrite...

I have told you this before troll, I am a registered independent. But I am sure it is hard for you to grasp, considering the religion you subscribe to. Now go back to bed and have sweet dreams as you rub your AL Gore baby doll.....:lol:

Oh my, another idiot with homosexual fantasies. Elvis, meat JR. JR, meat Elvis.
you're the one that fellates al gore on this board, cuntface.
 
Such are my colleagues - I have spoken with many. Some believe in man-made contribution to global warming, while many others do not. Funding is a HUGE factor in this debate. For example, I have met Steig personally, and know his department head very well - we boat together in the summer months. Nature did NOT audit the findings of Steig - they simply ran with the premise in the hopes of getting some much needed press. (Nature is apparently teetering on insolvency) This is quite common with all pro-GW papers - the peer review is more symbolic than substantive. The entire process has been corrupted for decades.

As for academic societies - I know well how those work too. The position statements of any given society do not reflect all members - and at times, do not even represent the majority of members. It is a select few on any given board that submits those positions.

Global warming interest is falling fast - even among academia.

Now if we happen to have a couple particularly warm summers, and it appears more money is to be made available in grants and whatnot for those academics supportive of the GW position, then this will alter and once again universities will see a flurry of pro-GW activity. Currently this is not happening.

Again using Steig as an example, his report ended up being an embarrassment to the university. It was so easily disputed, the data so obviously corrupted, that even pro-GWs were left shaking their collective heads. And Steig has yet to fully disclose his the supporting data behind his conclusions. Sadly though, his data continues to be used as a citing point for those scrambling to further the GW agenda - though at present, they are failing. And the debate within the scientific community against and for Steig is quite heated. I have been privy to the residual debate going on - and it is both entertaining, and reflective of the collective shift against the absolute AGW theory that held sway the last decade.

PS - the earth keeps on cooling.

I would rather it warm up a bit....

Your posts really are laughable.

The earth is warming, not cooling.

The polar ice cap and almost all of the glaciers are melting, not growing.

Keep living in your fantasy world.


The Earth was warming until about 5 years ago. It started to warm again in about 1980 after cooling for some time. The warming and cooling trends lately seem to go in several decade spans. CO2, in contrast, rises with amazing consistancy. Warming and cooling and CO2 seem to be acting independantly lately.

The Arctic Sea ice Extent seems to have gotten bigger this year than last year which is a neat trick since the CONSENSUS of experts was that the ice would be almost entirely gone this year. Oh, well. Just when you thought that a consensus meant something.

The glaciers that are melting today are finishing an advance that began for most of them 5000 to 7000 years ago. The glaciers are not remnants of the last Ice Age. They are remnants of the cooling period that start at about 5000 BC. We are returning to the climate that led to that time.

The climate of that time had nothing at all to do with SUV's or Coal fired power plants. It was, however, much warmer than it was in 1650. That cold snap also had nothing to do with CO2. Warming out of that cold snap also had nothing to do with CO2.

This might be a fantasy world, but it's the one we live in
.

Once again, great job. And despite what a couple in here would like to think - many in the scientific community feel just as you do regarding this increasingly laughable topic.
 
All my scientists?

Including the ones in every other country in the world?

When will you get it through your thick skull that the melting of the polar ice cap and almost all of the glacers IN THE WORLD is not a political issue?
Hypocrite

You really have lost it. You have nothing left except personal attacks.

How sad.

The country has totally repudiated your philosophy.
Hypocrite, if your not then show how your consumption of meat and meat by products are not causing CO2 emissions?

Hypocrite- 1.5 billion tons of CO2 emissions a year...if you live another 40 years that would be a grand total of about 60 billion tons of CO2 emissions you could save the atmosphere from.....
 
Last edited:
Oh my, another idiot with homosexual fantasies. Elvis, meat JR. JR, meat Elvis.

Are you having troubles with your conscience? What part about this post was homsexual?

Hypocrite and you can't hide it....

So why you are eating that chicken sandwich think about the damage your doing to planet earth. You hypocrite...

I have told you this before troll, I am a registered independent. But I am sure it is hard for you to grasp, considering the religion you subscribe to. Now go back to bed and have sweet dreams as you rub your AL Gore baby doll.....:lol:

Hell no, I am not eating a chicken sandwich. I am eating a beef steak, complete with trimmingns. I would only enjoy it more were it venison or elk. Next year for that.

I repeat, you enjoy killing the planet ... yet expect everyone else to pay for products and services you "approve" of, hypocrite actually fits.
 
All my scientists?

Including the ones in every other country in the world?

When will you get it through your thick skull that the melting of the polar ice cap and almost all of the glacers IN THE WORLD is not a political issue?
Hypocrite

You really have lost it. You have nothing left except personal attacks.

How sad.

The country has totally repudiated your philosophy.
Can you direct me to a link to prove this? Or is this just your lame opinion?
 
Are you having troubles with your conscience? What part about this post was homsexual?

Hypocrite and you can't hide it....

So why you are eating that chicken sandwich think about the damage your doing to planet earth. You hypocrite...

I have told you this before troll, I am a registered independent. But I am sure it is hard for you to grasp, considering the religion you subscribe to. Now go back to bed and have sweet dreams as you rub your AL Gore baby doll.....:lol:

Hell no, I am not eating a chicken sandwich. I am eating a beef steak, complete with trimmingns. I would only enjoy it more were it venison or elk. Next year for that.

I repeat, you enjoy killing the planet ... yet expect everyone else to pay for products and services you "approve" of, hypocrite actually fits.

He's a hypocrite, just like his hero, Al Gore, who flies around in his private jet "destroying the environment".
 
Hell no, I am not eating a chicken sandwich. I am eating a beef steak, complete with trimmingns. I would only enjoy it more were it venison or elk. Next year for that.

I repeat, you enjoy killing the planet ... yet expect everyone else to pay for products and services you "approve" of, hypocrite actually fits.

He's a hypocrite, just like his hero, Al Gore, who flies around in his private jet "destroying the environment".

If AL Gore, Old Rocks and Chrissy lives another 40 years and they all go vegan. They together could save 180 billion tons of CO2 emissions but I don't look for any of three to do it. They will continue to be hypocrites and ask everyone else to sacrifice for their religion which is AGW.
 
Hypocrite

You really have lost it. You have nothing left except personal attacks.

How sad.

The country has totally repudiated your philosophy.
Hypocrite, if your not then show how your consumption of meat and meat by products are not causing CO2 emissions?

Hypocrite- 1.5 billion tons of CO2 emissions a year...if you live another 40 years that would be a grand total of about 60 billion tons of CO2 emissions you could save the atmosphere from.....

So you admit that CO2 is a danger....
 
I repeat, you enjoy killing the planet ... yet expect everyone else to pay for products and services you "approve" of, hypocrite actually fits.

He's a hypocrite, just like his hero, Al Gore, who flies around in his private jet "destroying the environment".

If AL Gore, Old Rocks and Chrissy lives another 40 years and they all go vegan. They together could save 180 billion tons of CO2 emissions but I don't look for any of three to do it. They will continue to be hypocrites and ask everyone else to sacrifice for their religion which is AGW.

Sacrifice what?
 
He's a hypocrite, just like his hero, Al Gore, who flies around in his private jet "destroying the environment".

If AL Gore, Old Rocks and Chrissy lives another 40 years and they all go vegan. They together could save 180 billion tons of CO2 emissions but I don't look for any of three to do it. They will continue to be hypocrites and ask everyone else to sacrifice for their religion which is AGW.

Sacrifice what?

Sacrifice- pay more for energy, pay more for automobiles, pay more for just about everything.....because just about all products and services require an element of energy to produce them.
 
If AL Gore, Old Rocks and Chrissy lives another 40 years and they all go vegan. They together could save 180 billion tons of CO2 emissions but I don't look for any of three to do it. They will continue to be hypocrites and ask everyone else to sacrifice for their religion which is AGW.

Sacrifice what?

Sacrifice- pay more for energy, pay more for automobiles, pay more for just about everything.....because just about all products and services require an element of energy to produce them.

No, actually if we went green, we would pay less for energy.

It's called conservation. Ever heard of it?
 
You really have lost it. You have nothing left except personal attacks.

How sad.

The country has totally repudiated your philosophy.
Hypocrite, if your not then show how your consumption of meat and meat by products are not causing CO2 emissions?

Hypocrite- 1.5 billion tons of CO2 emissions a year...if you live another 40 years that would be a grand total of about 60 billion tons of CO2 emissions you could save the atmosphere from.....

So you admit that CO2 is a danger....
No you are making that claim, not me..

But if you want people to take you seriously, do your part. Eliminate 1.5 billion tons of what you claim is dangerous...
 
Last edited:
Sacrifice what?

Sacrifice- pay more for energy, pay more for automobiles, pay more for just about everything.....because just about all products and services require an element of energy to produce them.

No, actually if we went green, we would pay less for energy.

It's called conservation. Ever heard of it?

Please, so your telling me that Hybrids are cheaper than traditional cars?
 
Hypocrite, if your not then show how your consumption of meat and meat by products are not causing CO2 emissions?

Hypocrite- 1.5 billion tons of CO2 emissions a year...if you live another 40 years that would be a grand total of about 60 billion tons of CO2 emissions you could save the atmosphere from.....

So you admit that CO2 is a danger....
No you are making that claim, not me..

But if you want to people to take you seriously, do your part. Eliminate 1.5 billion tons of what you claim is dangerous...

I eliminated all future human created CO2.

I never had children.

Busted....
 
Sacrifice- pay more for energy, pay more for automobiles, pay more for just about everything.....because just about all products and services require an element of energy to produce them.

No, actually if we went green, we would pay less for energy.

It's called conservation. Ever heard of it?

Please, so your telling me that Hybrids are cheaper than traditional cars?

With gas at 2.50 and going up, damned right that they are. And were you driving an electric RAV 4 Toyota, and had solar on your roof, you would be paying nothing at all to the oil companies.
 
So you admit that CO2 is a danger....
No you are making that claim, not me..

But if you want to people to take you seriously, do your part. Eliminate 1.5 billion tons of what you claim is dangerous...

I eliminated all future human created CO2.

I never had children.

Busted....

What about the 1.5 billion tons of CO2 emissions a year that you are personally responsible for, I guess those are ok right? Hypocrite
 

Forum List

Back
Top