Funny how 31000 scientists disagree with global warming

[KittenKoder]

I, and all the Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and major Universities in the world. Hmmm.......................

No, not all, quit lying, the only ones that agree with you are the peer pressured and bullied scientists.

 

[Chris]

I, and all the Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and major Universities in the world. Hmmm.......................

No, not all, quit lying, the only ones that agree with you are the peer pressured and bullied scientists.

You are the one that is lying.

 

[Chris]

It should be noted that many on the UNIP are not actually scientists themselves.

The tide against the Global Warming machine has clearly shifted against them. As noted in previous posts, tens of millions of dollars are now being spent in an aggressive ad campaign to regain the climate message in conjunction with the Congressional consideration of Cap n Trade.

Despite these millions being spent (notice all the commercials on TV lately calling for "new" energy?) the public continues to be largely indifferent to the much-wanted hysteria that once prevailed over this issue.

The earth remains in a cooling pattern.

Gas prices are rising again.

Calls for increased domestic oil production, natural gas production, and nuclear plant expansion will result - things that will all create tens of thousands of new, high paying jobs.

Alternative energy will continue to grow in importance - but slowly.

And the earth will keep on spinnin'....

CO2 in the atmosphere increases every single day.

Every year we pump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. Soon we will have doubled the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Anyone who thinks doubling the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere will have no effect on the climate is a fool.

 

[KittenKoder]

I, and all the Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and major Universities in the world. Hmmm.......................

No, not all, quit lying, the only ones that agree with you are the peer pressured and bullied scientists.

You are the one that is lying.

Name one scientist that does not get their funding through one of the companies they endorse or a government that does not want to control their populace. Just one, that agrees with GW hoax.

 

[Chris]

No, not all, quit lying, the only ones that agree with you are the peer pressured and bullied scientists.

You are the one that is lying.

Name one scientist that does not get their funding through one of the companies they endorse or a government that does not want to control their populace. Just one, that agrees with GW hoax.

Have you ever talked to an atmospheric scientist?

 

[KittenKoder]

You are the one that is lying.

Name one scientist that does not get their funding through one of the companies they endorse or a government that does not want to control their populace. Just one, that agrees with GW hoax.

Have you ever talked to an atmospheric scientist?

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree.

 

[Chris]

Name one scientist that does not get their funding through one of the companies they endorse or a government that does not want to control their populace. Just one, that agrees with GW hoax.

Have you ever talked to an atmospheric scientist?

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree.

I will take that as a "no."
I suggest you go to a university near you and talk to one of the scientists about global warming. You really don't have any experience.

 

[KittenKoder]

Have you ever talked to an atmospheric scientist?

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree.

I will take that as a "no."
I suggest you go to a university near you and talk to one of the scientists about global warming. You really don't have any experience.

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree. Why can't you?

 

[Old Rocks]

I, and all the Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and major Universities in the world. Hmmm.......................

No, not all, quit lying, the only ones that agree with you are the peer pressured and bullied scientists.

OK, which of the above do not agree? Which Scientific Society states that global warming is not happening? Which National Academy of Science? Which major University?

 

[Old Rocks]

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree.

I will take that as a "no."
I suggest you go to a university near you and talk to one of the scientists about global warming. You really don't have any experience.

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree. Why can't you?

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

 

[KittenKoder]

I will take that as a "no."
I suggest you go to a university near you and talk to one of the scientists about global warming. You really don't have any experience.

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree. Why can't you?

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

LOL ... try harder, education institutes get a lot of government and private funding from corporations which all have reasons for it.

 

[elvis]

I will take that as a "no."
I suggest you go to a university near you and talk to one of the scientists about global warming. You really don't have any experience.

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree. Why can't you?

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

there you go again with that "real scientists" horseshit. YOU are not a scientist at all. Not even close. Sorry, but carpentry school doesn't count.

 

[Meister]

You are the one that is lying.

Name one scientist that does not get their funding through one of the companies they endorse or a government that does not want to control their populace. Just one, that agrees with GW hoax.

Have you ever talked to an atmospheric scientist?

That's your answer, Chris?

 

[Meister]

Why do you people argue with Old Rocks??? The man can see Mt. Helen's from his kitchen window. That qualifies him to be the Einstein of global warming.

 

[KittenKoder]

Why do you people argue with Old Rocks??? The man can see Mt. Helen's from his kitchen window. That qualifies him to be the Einstein of global warming.

LOL ... that means I must be an oceanographer! I can see the Sound from mine!

 

[jreeves]

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree. Why can't you?

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

LOL ... try harder, education institutes get a lot of government and private funding from corporations which all have reasons for it.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index....ecord_id=2158072E-802A-23AD-45F0-274616DB87E6
These people aren't real scientists either...

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.

“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.

“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. # #

In addition, the report will feature new peer-reviewed scientific studies and analyses refuting man-made warming fears and a heavy dose of inconvenient climate developments. (See Below: Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History')

The Senate Minority Report is an update of 2007’s blockbuster U.S. Senate Minority Report of over 400 dissenting scientists. See here: This new report will contain the names, quotes and analyses of literally hundreds of additional international scientists who publicly dissented from man-made climate fears in just 2008 alone. The chorus of scientific voices skeptical grow louder as a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses and real world data challenge the UN and former Vice President Al Gore's claims that the "science is settled" and there is a "consensus." The original 2007 U.S. Senate report is available here: Full Report Set To Be Released in the Next 24 Hours – Stay Tuned…

Now watch Chrissy and get your rocks off on global warming state every dissenting opinion is funded by BIG OIL....

All the while they are the biggest fucking hypocrites on earth. They have both stated they are not vegans, while going to a vegan diet could accomplish this according to their own gods of the AGW cult....
Be Veg! Go Green! Save Our Planet: Global shift to vegan diet would reduce emissions and mitigate costs 80%.
Dr. Joop Oude Lohuis (M): If you would go for a completely meatless diet in the next 10-15 years, then in the year 2050 you would have a 70% reduction of attaining the climate goals That is a substantial cost reduction in getting to the same climate targets.

VOICE: Going even further, the researchers found that a completely vegan diet with no animal products would save an enormous 80% by 2050. What’s more, another benefit was discovered. Because plant-based diets produce much more food for humans than meat and dairy-based diets, some of the land not used to grow livestock could be turned back into carbon-absorbing forests, which are known to help reduce CO2 emissions.

Dr. Joop Oude Lohuis (M): We assumed that the grasslands that were not used by cattle anymore would go back to their natural state. For that reason, several parts of the world will grow forests and retain carbon in terms of more woodland.

VOICE: Dr. Oude Lohuis said the trend toward plant-based alternatives to meat has already gained momentum as consumers learn about meat’s harm to health and the environment.

Dr. Joop Oude Lohuis (M): If you look around in shops, maybe two years ago there were four, five, or six alternatives in terms of soy products or alternatives for a piece of meat. And now it has quadrupled; maybe there are 20 or 25.It’s a very easy way to change your buying behavior and have a fantastic quality of your meal. It saves lives as well.

VOICE: We thank Dr. Joop Oude Lohuis and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency for demonstrating to us the tremendous power of a plant-based diet in reducing both financial costs and our carbon footprint. May we all quickly make this free and immediately beneficial choice to save lives and our planet.

In July 2008, during a videoconference with our Association members in the United States, Supreme Master Ching Hai once more encouraged the worldwide trend toward vegetarianism.

All those positive changes do indicate the higher level of consciousness as the world population become more aware of the ephemeral nature of life and how fragile the planet can be and realizing their lifestyle habits should be changed. So now they begin to treat the environment with respect.
They begin to have more vegetarian choice. It’s good to see.
.
All that change is good. And if we hasten this process, there will be Heaven on Earth. I hope we can make it. Just change to vegetarian diet. How easier can it be!

 

[Old Rocks]

Name one that is not endorsing a company they get funding from or funded by a government invested in controlling their population that agrees with the hoax, and a real scientist not a meteorologist with a fancy degree. Why can't you?

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

there you go again with that "real scientists" horseshit. YOU are not a scientist at all. Not even close. Sorry, but carpentry school doesn't count.

Nor have I ever pretended to be. I just post irrefutable information from scientists which ticks you fools off to no end.

 

[Meister]

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

there you go again with that "real scientists" horseshit. YOU are not a scientist at all. Not even close. Sorry, but carpentry school doesn't count.

Nor have I ever pretended to be. I just post irrefutable information from scientists which ticks you fools off to no end.

You don't tick me off Old Rocks...I just see who you really are. Your right there on the left edge...that's it. Now if I could just figure out how to get you to take that last step.

 

[elvis]

Many, many real scientists here;
Home : Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

there you go again with that "real scientists" horseshit. YOU are not a scientist at all. Not even close. Sorry, but carpentry school doesn't count.

Nor have I ever pretended to be. I just post irrefutable information from scientists which ticks you fools off to no end.

It's not irrefutable, you daft ****. you only think so because you refuse to take Al gore's dick out of your mouth.

 

[Old Rocks]

there you go again with that "real scientists" horseshit. YOU are not a scientist at all. Not even close. Sorry, but carpentry school doesn't count.

Nor have I ever pretended to be. I just post irrefutable information from scientists which ticks you fools off to no end.

It's not irrefutable, you daft ****. you only think so because you refuse to take Al gore's dick out of your mouth.

Your posts are so intellectual and informative