Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

[Maple]

Yes, yes, yes, Libruls founded the country, fought WWII, liberated Eastern Europe from the Soviets, and freed Iraq from Saddam and want to save us from the Glacier Eating CO2 Spaghetti Monster

We Owe you Liburls a debt we can never repay, like, say we were bankrupt.

Good one, the Glacier eating CO2 Spaghetti Monster. Thanks, I needed a good laugh

 

[Charles Stucker]

Man, can't ANYONE just address the issues anymore? Is that expecting too much?

If the OP were not so far off base on the initial issues.
The lending crisis was brought about by changes inflicted on the industry by (drum roll please) Bill Clinton.

Iraq - which is his complaint about Iraq, other than everything? HE wanders so much it becomes difficult to determine his actual point about which he wants to express displeasure.

Even the OP felt he could not address the issues, no he wanted to start with bashing.
Unless of course the point was bashing, and then bashing becomes the point of the thread and so anyone who bashes the OP is just doing what was wanted by the OP.

So, just to be clear
What is the actual issue of this thread?
Is it Homosexuals?
Is it Religion?
Is it Science?
Is it the Mortgage crisis?
Is it some aspect of Iraq?
Is it Differences between the two parties as the title suggests?

Perhaps the OP would care to restate his rambling OP without all the distracting elements.

 

[Truthmatters]

bricks for brains.

These people cant really be this stupid can they?

They refuse to read whats posted yet insist on commenting on it.

 

[Ringel05]

Pretty funny stiff here but I'm not sure some of the posters realize how funny they are.

One says they didn't read your post but offers an opinion of where you went wrong in it??????????

One just repeats blah

One starts talking about feminine hygiene
And one just tries to change the topic

Man, can't ANYONE just address the issues anymore? Is that expecting too much?

rdean wrote it. Anyone who has been on this board for more than a week knows if you've read one of rdeans' posts you essentially read them all. His gig is the blame game, what's so hard to understand about that.

ahhhh .... so instead of addressing the questions, just attack the questioner. That's the logical fallacy of ad hominem. It says more about the one using it than it does about his/her target.

Don't give me that crap. rdean is a broken partisan record and an extremely bad one at that. His generalized stereotypical presentations of those he disagrees with means he is either a laughing stock or a simple pathetic shill. Why lend credence to anything he says by open discussion until he can learn to do the same.

 

[Truthmatters]

then explain to us in detail how the mortgage meltdown is Bareny Franks fault?

 

[nodoginnafight]

If the OP were not so far off base on the initial issues.
The lending crisis was brought about by changes inflicted on the industry by (drum roll please) Bill Clinton.

Bill Clinton wrote the legislation? No? Then who wrote and passed the legislation?
Appears to me that A LOT OF FOLKS here are more interested in playing the blame game than actually looking at the issue.

Don't give me that crap. rdean is a broken partisan record and an extremely bad one at that. His generalized stereotypical presentations of those he disagrees with means he is either a laughing stock or a simple pathetic shill. Why lend credence to anything he says by open discussion until he can learn to do the same.

Because you ANTICIPATE what the OP will respond with, you just do it first? A "pre-emptive" ad hom, huh?

Well, if it makes you feel justified, then by all means .......

But OP wasn't the one doing it HERE.

 

[Ringel05]

then explain to us in detail how the mortgage meltdown is Bareny Franks fault?

I never said it was. You've read what I've stated before in other threads (I know because you responded). What's this game you want to play?

 

[Truthmatters]

then explain to us in detail how the mortgage meltdown is Bareny Franks fault?

I never said it was. You've read what I've stated before in other threads (I know because you responded). What's this game you want to play?

Then why have you insulted the thread starter?

 

[California Girl]

Pretty funny stiff here but I'm not sure some of the posters realize how funny they are.

One says they didn't read your post but offers an opinion of where you went wrong in it??????????

One just repeats blah

One starts talking about feminine hygiene
And one just tries to change the topic

Man, can't ANYONE just address the issues anymore? Is that expecting too much?

rdean wrote it. Anyone who has been on this board for more than a week knows if you've read one of rdeans' posts you essentially read them all. His gig is the blame game, what's so hard to understand about that.

something Republicans never do.

Unfortunately, rdean, since you seem to be of the opinion that Republicans don't care about Americans dying, ain't very many people on this board gonna take anything else you say with any credence whatsoever.

Welcome to the 'serious idiot zone', you're in good company, Zona's there.

 

[Ringel05]

then explain to us in detail how the mortgage meltdown is Bareny Franks fault?

I never said it was. You've read what I've stated before in other threads (I know because you responded). What's this game you want to play?

Then why have you insulted the thread starter?

Try reading the preceding posts specifically post number 24, it's the one where you started your little game with me. Then go back and read all rdeans' previous posts over the whole time he's been here and hopefully you'll understand.

 

[Charles Stucker]

Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

I see the references about events and am amazed at how Democrats and Republicans see the same thing in such remarkably different ways. Two subjects especially even though there are so many.

I think you got off track right after this point.
The fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats stems from their core supporters. Their similarity is in trying to sway independent voters, and both use a variety of unsavory tricks to accomplish that goal, as in Hillary Clinton holding onto the banking crisis in NY so she could time the release for optimal political effect. The Crisis might have been lessened or averted, but she preferred to game the situation. Nothing particularly Democrat with that, a Republican politician would have done the same given the chance.

Democratic core voters tend to be two very different sorts. The first sort is the poorly educated minimum wage earner who actually believes that socialism will help his/her abysmal situation. The second sort is highly successful but has the guilty knowledge that they used unscrupulous tactics to get there, so they support Democratic party socialism to assuage their own feelings of guilt. Naturally a few exceptions exist to these two groups, but they certainly constitute the vast majority of Democratic voters.

Republican voters actually come in three groups. The first is the stereotypical fat cat big businessman who has no concern about anything but himself. The second is the hard working class person who is educated enough to realize that the socialism proposed by the Democrats will just drag them down. The third are self made men/women who are as successful as their Democratic counterparts, but have done nothing to cause them guilt, and like the less affluent workers in the party realize that socialism will spell their doom.

there you go, a much more legible account of the Differences between the Democrats and Republicans.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

I see the references about events and am amazed at how Democrats and Republicans see the same thing in such remarkably different ways. Two subjects especially even though there are so many.

I think you got off track right after this point.
The fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats stems from their core supporters. Their similarity is in trying to sway independent voters, and both use a variety of unsavory tricks to accomplish that goal, as in Hillary Clinton holding onto the banking crisis in NY so she could time the release for optimal political effect. The Crisis might have been lessened or averted, but she preferred to game the situation. Nothing particularly Democrat with that, a Republican politician would have done the same given the chance.

Democratic core voters tend to be two very different sorts. The first sort is the poorly educated minimum wage earner who actually believes that socialism will help his/her abysmal situation. The second sort is highly successful but has the guilty knowledge that they used unscrupulous tactics to get there, so they support Democratic party socialism to assuage their own feelings of guilt. Naturally a few exceptions exist to these two groups, but they certainly constitute the vast majority of Democratic voters.

Republican voters actually come in three groups. The first is the stereotypical fat cat big businessman who has no concern about anything but himself. The second is the hard working class person who is educated enough to realize that the socialism proposed by the Democrats will just drag them down. The third are self made men/women who are as successful as their Democratic counterparts, but have done nothing to cause them guilt, and like the less affluent workers in the party realize that socialism will spell their doom.

there you go, a much more legible account of the Differences between the Democrats and Republicans.

Lots of assertion, little fact, and no evidence from Charles Stucker. Can't take it seriously.

 

[Charles Stucker]

Can't take it seriously.

So which sort of Democratic voter do you claim to be?

 

[rdean]

Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

I see the references about events and am amazed at how Democrats and Republicans see the same thing in such remarkably different ways. Two subjects especially even though there are so many.

I think you got off track right after this point.
The fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats stems from their core supporters. Their similarity is in trying to sway independent voters, and both use a variety of unsavory tricks to accomplish that goal, as in Hillary Clinton holding onto the banking crisis in NY so she could time the release for optimal political effect. The Crisis might have been lessened or averted, but she preferred to game the situation. Nothing particularly Democrat with that, a Republican politician would have done the same given the chance.

Democratic core voters tend to be two very different sorts. The first sort is the poorly educated minimum wage earner who actually believes that socialism will help his/her abysmal situation. The second sort is highly successful but has the guilty knowledge that they used unscrupulous tactics to get there, so they support Democratic party socialism to assuage their own feelings of guilt. Naturally a few exceptions exist to these two groups, but they certainly constitute the vast majority of Democratic voters.

Republican voters actually come in three groups. The first is the stereotypical fat cat big businessman who has no concern about anything but himself. The second is the hard working class person who is educated enough to realize that the socialism proposed by the Democrats will just drag them down. The third are self made men/women who are as successful as their Democratic counterparts, but have done nothing to cause them guilt, and like the less affluent workers in the party realize that socialism will spell their doom.

there you go, a much more legible account of the Differences between the Democrats and Republicans.

What do you mean by "socialism"? Do you have any problem with all the money being spent in Iraq and Afghanistan?

 

[Truthmatters]

I never said it was. You've read what I've stated before in other threads (I know because you responded). What's this game you want to play?

Then why have you insulted the thread starter?

Try reading the preceding posts specifically post number 24, it's the one where you started your little game with me. Then go back and read all rdeans' previous posts over the whole time he's been here and hopefully you'll understand.

because your a partisan hack is the answer.

He made some very good points which you can not refute

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

I see the references about events and am amazed at how Democrats and Republicans see the same thing in such remarkably different ways. Two subjects especially even though there are so many.

Ones I could talk about but won’t. Gay rights. Republican politicians will send money back to the conservative gay group “the Log Cabin” who sent them money. Even though the gay population is probably between 3 and 5% of the entire population, Republicans see them having equal rights as a much larger threat than the 50% divorce rate among heterosexuals, and the “swingers clubs in every state and the “swingers” conventions.

I also won’t talk about the Republican suspicion of scientists motives or that the majority of Republicans believe that a man could build a boat out of wood, pitch and nails and fill that boat with “million of pairs” of animals and ride out a “world wide” flood while taking care of these millions of animals.

Instead, let’s talk about Freddie/Fannie and the housing crisis. The way I understand what happened that brought about the collapse of the housing industry was that Freddie/Fannie used to provide mortgages. But, to procure one of these mortgages, you had to have a job and prove you could pay back the loan. During that time, Freddie/Fannie provided more than 70% of all mortgage loans in the US. After the deregulation of Wall Street, the mortgage business was moved to Wall Street so now they provided more than 70% of all mortgages. Wall Street passed out those mortgages with virtually no restrictions. The then took those loans, bundled them together and sold them overseas as “securities”. When those with the mortgages defaulted, that left foreign investors holding the bag.

Now, I have heard that it was Barney Frank behind the entire collapse, but I have never heard it explained how that could be. A gay Jew had that much power, even when the Republicans held both houses, the presidency and even had a majority in the Supreme Court? Republicans return money from gays, yet it was all Barney Frank?

Second:

I’ve heard how it’s so much better now in Iraq. They even show us the “purple finger” to prove it.

Everything I’ve heard is much different. When I point out that the new Iraqi constitution makes “Islam” the “national religion” and says “all legislation is based on Islam” (Article 2), Republicans shrug. They say, “Well, Islam is their religion, so what?”, besides, it’s none of our business. Worse, I’ve heard Republicans say Islam is dangerous and violent.

So thousands of our youngsters died in Iraq, plus, we killed tens of thousands of their people, and we are financing their rebuilding, but we don’t get a say in their new constitution? I don’t understand why not? Even worse, the Christian population was estimated to be almost 1 and a half million. Christians in Iraq have been chased out of the country; women raped or forced to convert to Islam. The population is now estimated to be between 3 to 4 hundred thousand. This has been reported in every major newspaper and news service in the world. Yet, American Republicans don’t seem to care.

And even worse, women now have to live under Islamic law. Walk around outside covered. They can’t leave home without a male escort. That means no jobs and no healthcare. Even though the US insisted that one third of cabinet posts go to women, which only stand if there are candidates available. Well, if they can’t go outside, can’t be uncovered, how can they run for office? Obviously, they can’t. Remember, they are now under Islamic law. The US insisted this be in their constitution. So the US could have had a greater impact, but didn’t.

Both women’s groups and Christians say things were better under Saddam. American Republicans say they are wrong. So who is right? American Republicans or those that live over there?

I would be interested in some Republicans writing down on what it is that Democrats have wrong about these issues.

What I expect is, “You stupid f*cktard, you don’t know what you are talking about”. It seems that name calling has become the “response”. No one ever “explains” their position. I still don't know why Republicans feel a hardcore Islamic government is ok in Iraq or why the housing collapse is because of Barney Frank.

didn't you just try to give me crap in the "liberals are intolerant of others" thread? Nice hypocracy there dude!!!!

Way to go.

 

[Truthmatters]

Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

I see the references about events and am amazed at how Democrats and Republicans see the same thing in such remarkably different ways. Two subjects especially even though there are so many.

I think you got off track right after this point.
The fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats stems from their core supporters. Their similarity is in trying to sway independent voters, and both use a variety of unsavory tricks to accomplish that goal, as in Hillary Clinton holding onto the banking crisis in NY so she could time the release for optimal political effect. The Crisis might have been lessened or averted, but she preferred to game the situation. Nothing particularly Democrat with that, a Republican politician would have done the same given the chance.

Democratic core voters tend to be two very different sorts. The first sort is the poorly educated minimum wage earner who actually believes that socialism will help his/her abysmal situation. The second sort is highly successful but has the guilty knowledge that they used unscrupulous tactics to get there, so they support Democratic party socialism to assuage their own feelings of guilt. Naturally a few exceptions exist to these two groups, but they certainly constitute the vast majority of Democratic voters.

Republican voters actually come in three groups. The first is the stereotypical fat cat big businessman who has no concern about anything but himself. The second is the hard working class person who is educated enough to realize that the socialism proposed by the Democrats will just drag them down. The third are self made men/women who are as successful as their Democratic counterparts, but have done nothing to cause them guilt, and like the less affluent workers in the party realize that socialism will spell their doom.

there you go, a much more legible account of the Differences between the Democrats and Republicans.

What a load of partisan hackery

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans

I see the references about events and am amazed at how Democrats and Republicans see the same thing in such remarkably different ways. Two subjects especially even though there are so many.

I think you got off track right after this point.
The fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats stems from their core supporters. Their similarity is in trying to sway independent voters, and both use a variety of unsavory tricks to accomplish that goal, as in Hillary Clinton holding onto the banking crisis in NY so she could time the release for optimal political effect. The Crisis might have been lessened or averted, but she preferred to game the situation. Nothing particularly Democrat with that, a Republican politician would have done the same given the chance.

Democratic core voters tend to be two very different sorts. The first sort is the poorly educated minimum wage earner who actually believes that socialism will help his/her abysmal situation. The second sort is highly successful but has the guilty knowledge that they used unscrupulous tactics to get there, so they support Democratic party socialism to assuage their own feelings of guilt. Naturally a few exceptions exist to these two groups, but they certainly constitute the vast majority of Democratic voters.

Republican voters actually come in three groups. The first is the stereotypical fat cat big businessman who has no concern about anything but himself. The second is the hard working class person who is educated enough to realize that the socialism proposed by the Democrats will just drag them down. The third are self made men/women who are as successful as their Democratic counterparts, but have done nothing to cause them guilt, and like the less affluent workers in the party realize that socialism will spell their doom.

there you go, a much more legible account of the Differences between the Democrats and Republicans.

Wow good post!

 

[Truthmatters]

No surprize you like it hack

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

No surprize you like it hack

This post is priceless after you exposed yourself over the Iraq stuff in the other thread.