Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,197
- 2,320
The Senate had a simple majority rule.
The model is restored.
The model is restored.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Now the nonsense about the 2 parties being the same will finally be put to rest.To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
Good, GOP disfunction was pathetic. This will mean gov't can work again. Go Trump! Do some research, learning real facts and growing. 50% GOP, 50% Dem...Dump the dupes.To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
They need to get rid of the filibuster on regular legislation too,
since politics and demographics in the long term favor the country having Democratic president with a 50 something Democratic Senate majority.
They need to get rid of the filibuster on regular legislation too,
since politics and demographics in the long term favor the country having Democratic president with a 50 something Democratic Senate majority.
Don't count your chickens. There is no constitutional right to vote, and voting privileges may change.
After all, what logic is there in permitting those on the public dole the privilege of voting to increase their benefits?
They need to get rid of the filibuster on regular legislation too,
since politics and demographics in the long term favor the country having Democratic president with a 50 something Democratic Senate majority.
Don't count your chickens. There is no constitutional right to vote, and voting privileges may change.
After all, what logic is there in permitting those on the public dole the privilege of voting to increase their benefits?
There are multiple constitutional rights to vote.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
Liberal?To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
LOL the American people are fed up with your liberal BS, RIP Democratic party.
Yes, they do. Now those consequences have been magnified. Once the dems regain control you will see what those consequences look like when the republicans will not even need to show up - they will be irrelevant.To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
Elections have consequences. Get over it. The dems rode roughshod all over the Republicans for the last 8 years. The people said enough.
Apparently you did not even bother to read my post.To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them.
Not yet. The fifty-one vote threshold applies only to appointments, not legislation. Nuclear option - Wikipedia
In any case, if the requirement does go to fifty-one votes for legislation, it may be better. Action will be taken on critical issues, the American people will see the results of those actions, and vote accordingly.
Perhaps this would encourage our elected "leaders" to think for themselves and do what's in the best interest of the country instead of what's in the best interest of their party.
To the detriment of the system as a whole. Now, the minority party has literally no say in anything - a majority can simply run roughshod over them. When the dems regain control, and regain control they will, those celebrating this change now will lament it.
They need to get rid of the filibuster on regular legislation too,
since politics and demographics in the long term favor the country having Democratic president with a 50 something Democratic Senate majority.
Don't count your chickens. There is no constitutional right to vote, and voting privileges may change.
After all, what logic is there in permitting those on the public dole the privilege of voting to increase their benefits?
There are multiple constitutional rights to vote.
List them.