Frankfurt First German City Where Natives are Minority

[Dale Smith]

For the first time, more than half of Frankfurt residents now have a migrant background, according to official data from the city’s Office of Statistics and Elections.

So there you have it....Turks are the city’s largest non-German minority.


Frankfurt Becomes First German City Where Natives Are Minority

'
And Germany better keep letting the Turks come in lest they become mad and violent that their peeps are not being allowed into the country. It totally astounds me as to how pussy-whipped Europeans are.

Correction, how pussy-whipped many Western Europeans are.
Americans are pussy-whipped in comparison to many Eastern Europeans.

Hell, American males are pussies regardless of which segment of society you compare them against. I am not by any means including conservative males in this survey #1 Because there is a dwindling # of them #2 They are getting older and dying off.....sad but a fact.

 

[ESay]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

 

[Correll]

For the first time, more than half of Frankfurt residents now have a migrant background, according to official data from the city’s Office of Statistics and Elections.

So there you have it....Turks are the city’s largest non-German minority.


Frankfurt Becomes First German City Where Natives Are Minority

I bet the Native Americans think the same about New York,just sayin...steve

So, do you think that the germans should consider what happened to the Indians?

 

[Toro]

For the first time, more than half of Frankfurt residents now have a migrant background, according to official data from the city’s Office of Statistics and Elections.

So there you have it....Turks are the city’s largest non-German minority.


Frankfurt Becomes First German City Where Natives Are Minority

Most of the "migrants" in Frankfurt aren't the scary dark people you guys hide under the bed from. Frankfurt is the banking center of Germany. It's an international city. There are many other European nationals living and working in the financial sector in Frankfurt. It's booming and attracting professionals from all across Europe. Most of the people you see walking around the city center are Europeans.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

So, the Irish, the Germans, the Mexicans, all of these aren't natives, but the blacks are, in the US?

 

[ESay]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

So, the Irish, the Germans, the Mexicans, all of these aren't natives, but the blacks are, in the US?

It is hard to say about the US in this context. The US is the state of immigrants from the very beginning. And all nations mentioned by you can be considered as natives, including the blacks (though it is not a nation as far as I am aware).

 

[frigidweirdo]

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

So, the Irish, the Germans, the Mexicans, all of these aren't natives, but the blacks are, in the US?

It is hard to say about the US in this context. The US is the state of immigrants from the very beginning. And all nations mentioned by you can be considered as natives, including the blacks (though it is not a nation as far as I am aware).

It's a nation of migrants because the migrants brought the idea of nationhood upon the land, and then decide that it is nationhood that makes someone native. Whereas the native peoples think otherwise.

Now, if you're going to judge that German born Turks aren't natives, then American born Irish, English etc aren't natives in the US>

Here's the problem, people trying to get political capital out of scaring people about Muslims taking over, will present an article showing how shocking it is that Frankfurt is less than 50% "native" and then point out the Turks, at 16%, are the largest minority group, and wham, you have a huge reason to hate Muslims. But then if you go to the US, oh, we have to compartmentalize all of this so the US is different, so it's all about how many WHITE PEOPLE there are in America, because using Natives is different.

The BNP in the UK (and other far right groups as the BNP has splintered and gone to pot), and other far right groups in Europe will talk about the "indigenous populations", and they're real big pals with the far right groups in South Africa and the US who don't talk about "indigenous populations", because they know they can't. Each group will use what is convenient for them, but support groups who are the opposite of what they find convenient.

 

[ESay]

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

So, the Irish, the Germans, the Mexicans, all of these aren't natives, but the blacks are, in the US?

It is hard to say about the US in this context. The US is the state of immigrants from the very beginning. And all nations mentioned by you can be considered as natives, including the blacks (though it is not a nation as far as I am aware).

It's a nation of migrants because the migrants brought the idea of nationhood upon the land, and then decide that it is nationhood that makes someone native. Whereas the native peoples think otherwise.

Now, if you're going to judge that German born Turks aren't natives, then American born Irish, English etc aren't natives in the US>

Here's the problem, people trying to get political capital out of scaring people about Muslims taking over, will present an article showing how shocking it is that Frankfurt is less than 50% "native" and then point out the Turks, at 16%, are the largest minority group, and wham, you have a huge reason to hate Muslims. But then if you go to the US, oh, we have to compartmentalize all of this so the US is different, so it's all about how many WHITE PEOPLE there are in America, because using Natives is different.

The BNP in the UK (and other far right groups as the BNP has splintered and gone to pot), and other far right groups in Europe will talk about the "indigenous populations", and they're real big pals with the far right groups in South Africa and the US who don't talk about "indigenous populations", because they know they can't. Each group will use what is convenient for them, but support groups who are the opposite of what they find convenient.

Europe throughout centuries has been a place where white, overwhelmingly Christian nations live. These nations were creating their states, the form of these states constantly changed. But what were the remarkable points of them? They were white, Christian, with strong nationalistic views. Now the situation is dramatically changing – many Europeans see many people from different cultures which live in their countries, the number of these newcomers is growing, and not all of them want to integrate in European society, moreover – some of them want their habits and customs to be incorporated by this society. Of course, some Europeans don’t want this to happen and want ‘the old good times’ to be returned.

I don’t know what is better – national white European states or diversity in the current form. Yes, no one has harmed the white Christian people more than white Christian people. But I don’t believe in multiculturalism.

I hope I made my point clear.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

So, the Irish, the Germans, the Mexicans, all of these aren't natives, but the blacks are, in the US?

It is hard to say about the US in this context. The US is the state of immigrants from the very beginning. And all nations mentioned by you can be considered as natives, including the blacks (though it is not a nation as far as I am aware).

It's a nation of migrants because the migrants brought the idea of nationhood upon the land, and then decide that it is nationhood that makes someone native. Whereas the native peoples think otherwise.

Now, if you're going to judge that German born Turks aren't natives, then American born Irish, English etc aren't natives in the US>

Here's the problem, people trying to get political capital out of scaring people about Muslims taking over, will present an article showing how shocking it is that Frankfurt is less than 50% "native" and then point out the Turks, at 16%, are the largest minority group, and wham, you have a huge reason to hate Muslims. But then if you go to the US, oh, we have to compartmentalize all of this so the US is different, so it's all about how many WHITE PEOPLE there are in America, because using Natives is different.

The BNP in the UK (and other far right groups as the BNP has splintered and gone to pot), and other far right groups in Europe will talk about the "indigenous populations", and they're real big pals with the far right groups in South Africa and the US who don't talk about "indigenous populations", because they know they can't. Each group will use what is convenient for them, but support groups who are the opposite of what they find convenient.

Europe throughout centuries has been a place where white, overwhelmingly Christian nations live. These nations were creating their states, the form of these states constantly changed. But what were the remarkable points of them? They were white, Christian, with strong nationalistic views. Now the situation is dramatically changing – many Europeans see many people from different cultures which live in their countries, the number of these newcomers is growing, and not all of them want to integrate in European society, moreover – some of them want their habits and customs to be incorporated by this society. Of course, some Europeans don’t want this to happen and want ‘the old good times’ to be returned.

I don’t know what is better – national white European states or diversity in the current form. Yes, no one has harmed the white Christian people more than white Christian people. But I don’t believe in multiculturalism.

I hope I made my point clear.

Yes, you've made your point clear and I'm not sure I totally agree with you.

I'm certainly not against other peoples, but also think that nationals should try and preserve a little of their own identity. The problem is, the biggest killer of identity isn't multiculturalism, it's modernity. Go to a place like England, every village had its own little festival, celebrated in a certain way, and most of these have died out as the villages have become suburbs for the towns nearby. The old houses are for the rich, newer houses have been built, and it doesn't even need a single black or asian person to be nearby.

 

[Preacher]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

 

[ESay]

It is a good question. On the one hand all people who were born in a country should be considered natives.

On the other – states have been created as national entities with one particular nation which has a leading role, with a number of nations which have lived there since the creation of the state. In this case only these nations can be considered as natives.

So, the Irish, the Germans, the Mexicans, all of these aren't natives, but the blacks are, in the US?

It is hard to say about the US in this context. The US is the state of immigrants from the very beginning. And all nations mentioned by you can be considered as natives, including the blacks (though it is not a nation as far as I am aware).

It's a nation of migrants because the migrants brought the idea of nationhood upon the land, and then decide that it is nationhood that makes someone native. Whereas the native peoples think otherwise.

Now, if you're going to judge that German born Turks aren't natives, then American born Irish, English etc aren't natives in the US>

Here's the problem, people trying to get political capital out of scaring people about Muslims taking over, will present an article showing how shocking it is that Frankfurt is less than 50% "native" and then point out the Turks, at 16%, are the largest minority group, and wham, you have a huge reason to hate Muslims. But then if you go to the US, oh, we have to compartmentalize all of this so the US is different, so it's all about how many WHITE PEOPLE there are in America, because using Natives is different.

The BNP in the UK (and other far right groups as the BNP has splintered and gone to pot), and other far right groups in Europe will talk about the "indigenous populations", and they're real big pals with the far right groups in South Africa and the US who don't talk about "indigenous populations", because they know they can't. Each group will use what is convenient for them, but support groups who are the opposite of what they find convenient.

Europe throughout centuries has been a place where white, overwhelmingly Christian nations live. These nations were creating their states, the form of these states constantly changed. But what were the remarkable points of them? They were white, Christian, with strong nationalistic views. Now the situation is dramatically changing – many Europeans see many people from different cultures which live in their countries, the number of these newcomers is growing, and not all of them want to integrate in European society, moreover – some of them want their habits and customs to be incorporated by this society. Of course, some Europeans don’t want this to happen and want ‘the old good times’ to be returned.

I don’t know what is better – national white European states or diversity in the current form. Yes, no one has harmed the white Christian people more than white Christian people. But I don’t believe in multiculturalism.

I hope I made my point clear.

Yes, you've made your point clear and I'm not sure I totally agree with you.

I'm certainly not against other peoples, but also think that nationals should try and preserve a little of their own identity. The problem is, the biggest killer of identity isn't multiculturalism, it's modernity. Go to a place like England, every village had its own little festival, celebrated in a certain way, and most of these have died out as the villages have become suburbs for the towns nearby. The old houses are for the rich, newer houses have been built, and it doesn't even need a single black or asian person to be nearby.

Rural areas are priceless storehouse of local habits, folklore, and the like. And urbanization wipes off this from the face of earth, yes. But I am not about this. I am talking about the things which have already become an integral part of the Western society – religious freedom, equality of women, secular form of the rule, freedom of speech and the press, and so on. Some ethnic and religious groups want to reverse this because these things contradict their beliefs. They must decide either they accept all of that and integrate or leave the countries. This should be applied even to those who were born in these countries and have their citizenship. I understand that this idea can’t be accomplished overnight and requires a lot of efforts and can have bad consequences in the short term.

 

[Montrovant]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

Are Native Americans not the native people of the country?

In Frankfurt there will be lots of German Turks, they were born in the country, their parents were born in the country, but they're not considered native, so how can a white American be considered native in the USA?

Were German-born Turks not considered native in the report? It is in German and the best I can do with that is hope that a translation program doesn't screw up too badly.

 

[Montrovant]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

 

[Montrovant]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

I got those stats from wikipedia under the demographics section. No, there's no joke. Those are the native levels in those cities.

I don't know why I didn't realize you were talking about American Indians.

 

[Preacher]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

I know facts must REALLY hurt your pea sized brain. Is it REALLY that hard to do your own research snowflake? I can show evidence but if someone is THAT ignorant I won't waste my time.

 

[Montrovant]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

I know facts must REALLY hurt your pea sized brain. Is it REALLY that hard to do your own research snowflake? I can show evidence but if someone is THAT ignorant I won't waste my time.

I'll just repeat my

 

[Preacher]

I assumed

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

I know facts must REALLY hurt your pea sized brain. Is it REALLY that hard to do your own research snowflake? I can show evidence but if someone is THAT ignorant I won't waste my time.

I'll just repeat my

I assumed you would. As I said earlier today. Some people are born skeptics,some are born sheep.....BAHHHHHH says you.

 

[Montrovant]

I assumed

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

I know facts must REALLY hurt your pea sized brain. Is it REALLY that hard to do your own research snowflake? I can show evidence but if someone is THAT ignorant I won't waste my time.

I'll just repeat my

I assumed you would. As I said earlier today. Some people are born skeptics,some are born sheep.....BAHHHHHH says you.

Yep, you're a wolf amongst sheep.....

Whites are the natives! Not those damned darkies!

 

[Preacher]

I assumed

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

I know facts must REALLY hurt your pea sized brain. Is it REALLY that hard to do your own research snowflake? I can show evidence but if someone is THAT ignorant I won't waste my time.

I'll just repeat my

I assumed you would. As I said earlier today. Some people are born skeptics,some are born sheep.....BAHHHHHH says you.

Yep, you're a wolf amongst sheep.....

Whites are the natives! Not those damned darkies!

Google is your friend sheeple. Try it. I mean unless you deny science?

 

[frigidweirdo]

The funny thing here is, let's compare this to US cities.

New York has a 0.6% Native population
Chicago has a 0.5% Native population
LA has a 0.5% Native population

And Frankfurt has 48.8% Native population and somehow this is a problem.

Where do you get those stats from? Am I missing the joke?

It seems that she (he) means those who belong to the Native Americans.
Native Americans in the United States - Wikipedia

No one said Frigid was smart. 1. Natives would be WHITE PEOPLE since 1. Europeans found America first 2. White people instituted the first government etc in America. Therefore WE are the natives.

Yeah, just go off and attack people.... you might think it makes your argument.

But no, your argument doesn't make much sense.

Europeans "found America first", er... what the fuck? Oh, yeah, you hang out with the Stormfront gang who have spent ages trying to prove that white people were in the Americas before the people who were already there when white people turned up, yeah, go figure.....