Franken urged to reverse his resignation

Franken urged to reverse his resignation
At least four senators are urging Al Franken to reconsider resigning, including two who issued statements calling for the resignation two weeks ago and said they now feel remorse over what they feel was a rush to judgment....................................



So lets get this straight there is proof he did this, he admitted to doing the dirty, yet there is no proof of Trump etc. doing any of these things and they want to hang him and impeach him. For the lower guys get them out of office.

Just like Roy no proof, no admittance and the rabid dog mental cases want to hang him with no proof you fkrs are so retarded so hypocritical gawd you all are sickening.

So here is how mental they are and this proves it over and over they prove how sick in the heads they are ,

they will actually want someone who admits his guilt to be put back into office........................Mmmmk

it's so funny watching you people pretend to give a damn about women.

:rofl:

let me know when Donald, the admitted sexual predator resigns from the white house.

Who was really pretending to care about women, Jillian? Harvey Weinstein was speaking at women's marches. Did he "care"?

You voted for Donald AFTER the access Hollywood tape.

Weinstein is out of work.

See the difference?

And if it isn't about concern for women then the little conspiracy nutter should find something else to post about.

I do see a difference! Harvey Weinstein is a serial sexual predator and has been for decades at the same time he was supporting liberal causes. Other liberals knew exactly what Weinstein was like yet they had the gall to accuse Mitt Romney of a "war on women" because he had a list of women he was considering for appointment? Weinstein being "revealed" didn't happen because some GOP political operatives went after him with questionable accusations from decades ago...he was accused by women NOW.
the binders "outrage" was about as pathetic as they come
 
Lol please highlight the part that about how acting you are going to touch a person with your hand is assault.
Thanks.
Maybe i am wrong but it would be nice if you prove your claim instead of arguing with "nu uh" and name calling. PErhaps there are court cases that determined this? Maybe they can explain better than you.

Do you really not grasp that it's the "threat" that can constitute assault? Now you want me to cite case law? Seriously? Your own cite explains what I'm saying...you simply won't admit it!
no it doesnt. However i did ask you to highlight the part that did. Maybe i overlooked it.

Assault is defined as an unlawful physical attack or threat of attack. Assaults may be classified as aggravated or simple. Rape, attempted rape, and sexual assaults are excluded from this category, as well as robbery and attempted robbery. The severity of assaults ranges from minor threats to incidents which are nearly fatal. Assault is categorized as --

  • Aggravated assault - Attack or attempted attack with a weapon, regardless of whether or not an injury occurred and attack without a weapon then serious injury results
    • With injury - An attack without a weapon when serious injury results or an attack with a weapon involving any injury. Serious injury includes broken bones, lost teeth, internal injuries, loss of consciousness, and any unspecified injury requiring two or more days of hospitalization
    • Threatened with a weapon - Threat or attempted attack by an offender armed with a gun, knife, or other object used as a weapon, not resulting in victim injury
  • Simple assault - Attack without a weapon resulting either in no injury, minor injury (for example, bruises, black eyes, cuts, scratches or swelling) or in undetermined injury requiring less than 2 days of hospitalization. Also includes attempted assault without a weapon
    • With minor injury - An attack without a weapon resulting in such injuries as bruises, black eyes, cuts or in undetermined injury requiring less than 2 days of hospitalization
    • Without injury - An attempted assault without a weapon not resulting in injury
    You seem to be struggling to grasp that there is a difference between assault and assault and battery.
So if i act like i am going to touch someone, that can be assault?
IDK, i guess i see where you are coming from but it seems as if you are really grasping for air..

If you act like you're going to touch someone in a threatening way then YES...you are guilty of assault! That's the law. Why you think my pointing it out is me "grasping for air" is something you'll have to explain!
I edited that part out. I was wrong.
 
Franken urged to reverse his resignation
At least four senators are urging Al Franken to reconsider resigning, including two who issued statements calling for the resignation two weeks ago and said they now feel remorse over what they feel was a rush to judgment....................................



So lets get this straight there is proof he did this, he admitted to doing the dirty, yet there is no proof of Trump etc. doing any of these things and they want to hang him and impeach him. For the lower guys get them out of office.

Just like Roy no proof, no admittance and the rabid dog mental cases want to hang him with no proof you fkrs are so retarded so hypocritical gawd you all are sickening.

So here is how mental they are and this proves it over and over they prove how sick in the heads they are ,

they will actually want someone who admits his guilt to be put back into office........................Mmmmk

it's so funny watching you people pretend to give a damn about women.

:rofl:

let me know when Donald, the admitted sexual predator resigns from the white house.

Who was really pretending to care about women, Jillian? Harvey Weinstein was speaking at women's marches. Did he "care"?

is Harvey in the white house, dear?

No, Donald Trump is...despite you snowflakes going after him with an audio tape of private conversation dredged up from decades ago! What I find amusing, Jillian is the number of liberal icons felled by the left's sudden preoccupation with "sexual harassment" all brought about by your dogged determination to pin SOMETHING on Trump! So how's that working out for you so far, dear? Trump is STILL in the Oval Office but Harvey Weinstein is toast...Matt Lauer is on the street...John Conyers is being put out to pasture...and Al Franken is hanging on by his fingernails.
 
It was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fucking obvious this was going to happen.

IT WAS DEMOCRAT POLITICAL BULLSHIT....they never wanted him to leave, they wanted to affect the Alabama election and trade CONYERS AND FRANKEN FOR TRUMP.


Democrats are funny.

Analysis | Could Al Franken un-resign? Sure.
Did you see Manchin's interview that instigated this story?

No, I heard his sound byte on the radio.

New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand will still be on the warpath, because she thinks she will be the first female President....she has to get any competition out of her way.
 
:lol:

The "Democrats" are all clamoring. Of course.

From your link:

Nearly all Senate Democrats still maintain he should resign, and pressure from his colleagues is what pushed Franken out in the first place.
 
I typed "DEMOCRATS"....not "ALL DEMOCRATS" and I cited how New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand will still be on the warpath, because she thinks she will be the first female President....she has to get any competition out of her way.


Are any republicans encouraging Franken to NOT RESIGN?

I don't know of any....which ones are you aware of? if you list them, I will change the subject line to include Republicans.
 
It was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fucking obvious this was going to happen.

IT WAS DEMOCRAT POLITICAL BULLSHIT....they never wanted him to leave, they wanted to affect the Alabama election and trade CONYERS AND FRANKEN FOR TRUMP.


Democrats are funny.

Analysis | Could Al Franken un-resign? Sure.
Did you see Manchin's interview that instigated this story?

No, I heard his sound byte on the radio.

New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand will still be on the warpath, because she thinks she will be the first female President....she has to get any competition out of her way.


I hope the dumb slut stays with that train of thought. She will be gutted by her own party. She will also answer for turning on the Clintons.
 
Over on MSN

upload_2017-12-18_13-40-44.png


Could Al Franken un-resign? It's possible.
 
It was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fucking obvious this was going to happen.

IT WAS DEMOCRAT POLITICAL BULLSHIT....they never wanted him to leave, they wanted to affect the Alabama election and trade CONYERS AND FRANKEN FOR TRUMP.


Democrats are funny.

Analysis | Could Al Franken un-resign? Sure.
Did you see Manchin's interview that instigated this story?

No, I heard his sound byte on the radio.

New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand will still be on the warpath, because she thinks she will be the first female President....she has to get any competition out of her way.
I think Manchin made perfect sense. I'd think you'd fall in line with that train of thought. No?
 
It was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fucking obvious this was going to happen.

IT WAS DEMOCRAT POLITICAL BULLSHIT....they never wanted him to leave, they wanted to affect the Alabama election and trade CONYERS AND FRANKEN FOR TRUMP.


Democrats are funny.

Analysis | Could Al Franken un-resign? Sure.
Did you see Manchin's interview that instigated this story?

No, I heard his sound byte on the radio.

New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand will still be on the warpath, because she thinks she will be the first female President....she has to get any competition out of her way.


I hope the dumb slut stays with that train of thought. She will be gutted by her own party. She will also answer for turning on the Clintons.
Whats wrong with you? #angerissues
 

Forum List

Back
Top