Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so, you really think detectives would be tracking down an errant news report?with a crime of the magnitude of 9-11 a proper investigator would want to determine who at Reuters put it put on the wire.. from who they sourced the information.. and why this fact was later denied and the facts withheld..and don't even bother to tell me they wouldn't ..I grew up with detectives..
no, they would examine the BUILDINGS debrisyes ..they would indeed.. if where examining .. did this building collapse due to fire or was foul play involved ..
no, it wasntno the evidence was quickly disposed of.. cleared out.. sold as scrape..
too bad it lies
and if you where investigating this crime that that assumption would suffice for you ?
no, it wasnt
not "quickly" like you guys claim
and investigators had full access to it for months
they took samples and ran their tests
May 29 2002: As the last steel column of the demolished World Trade Center was removed Tuesday, construction workers at the site were honored for their work there since September 11th.
"There has been some concern expressed by others that the work of the team has been hampered because debris was removed from the site and has subsequently been processed for recycling. This is not the case. The team has had full access to the scrap yards and to the site and has been able to obtain numerous samples. At this point there is no indication that having access to each piece of steel from the World Trade Center would make a significant difference to understanding the performance of the structures".
"I think the Bush administration would have had to be utterly insane to try anything like what is alleged, for their own narrow interests, and do not think that serious evidence has been provided to support claims about actions that would not only be outlandish, for their own interests, but that have no remote historical parallel.
Again, you put your faith in youtube videos that could have came from anyone instead of what the experts think. http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf
This paper gives their reasoning why all of the WTC buildings fell and it was written by an engineering expert.
Look at this photo here:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/av.caesar/wtc/wtc7_2.jpg
As you can clearly see there has been significant damage to the building. Anyone can see from this that the damage should be enough to bring down the structure.
What I do not understand is if the govt is behind 9/11 why would they have brought down WTC 7 at all? Most people didn't even know of the building until these conspiracy theories started popping up. It would seem that they were just simply putting a target on their back if they decided for no reason at all to bring down third building. Again, there was NO reason to bring down this building.
it DIDfrom this photo it is clear the building would fall to one side if anything
not evenly in the controlled manner in which it did..that is not possible from the damage shown in the picture
it did notit fell into its own footprint at free fall speed..
more bullshit and lies
from this photo it is clear the building would fall to one side if anything
not evenly in the controlled manner in which it did..that is not possible from the damage shown in the picture
uh, no, eotsit did not
it fell over into WTC6
