Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What opinion I am forcing on you again?We still want small government and let the people decide what is right and wrong...unlike you who must force you opinions on everyone.These phony cucks are all about small government until they suddenly aren’t anymore.
Who’s fact checking the fact checkers?I wish I was making this up, but no, FOX News really is going that Stalinist. Since they're getting embarrassed by fact-checkers, they want fact-checking made illegal unless fact-checkers get a government license.
David Marcus: Nobody is checking the social media fact checkers. It's time that changed
Throughout the past year biased fact checking has done irreparable harm to the body politic.www.foxnews.com
From the article:
The real problem here is not that fact checkers got something wrong, it’s that they have the power to censor what journalism Americans see and consume unilaterally.
Yes, yes, the standard conservative "Pointing out that I lied is censoring me!" argument.
The First Amendment rightly renders government powerless to regulate news outlets’ publishing content from their own in house fact checkers -- they are protected by freedom of the press. But third party independent fact checkers are another story entirely.
Really, FOX? Because as everyone else sees it, the fact-checkers are press too. And FOX wants them shut down by government force.
So what can be done about this dangerous situation? A new bill before the Michigan House of Representatives is a move in the right direction. The bill would require fact checkers to register with the government and carry insurance to cover payment to those who suffer financial damages as a result of a bogus fact check.
So when FOX says a Democrat lies, that would be a fact check, so they'd have to register with the government.
Yeah, right.
So, how many conservatives agree with FOX, and say that government should ban any fact-checkers not approved by the government?
Be cause Biden has forged a much better relationship with CNN and he doesn’t lie to the American people nearly as much as Trump
Nobody who loves freedom would support criminalizing fact checking, which is also free speech.I wish I was making this up, but no, FOX News really is going that Stalinist. Since they're getting embarrassed by fact-checkers, they want fact-checking made illegal unless fact-checkers get a government license.
David Marcus: Nobody is checking the social media fact checkers. It's time that changed
Throughout the past year biased fact checking has done irreparable harm to the body politic.
From the article:
The real problem here is not that fact checkers got something wrong, it’s that they have the power to censor what journalism Americans see and consume unilaterally.
Yes, yes, the standard conservative "Pointing out that I lied is censoring me!" argument.
The First Amendment rightly renders government powerless to regulate news outlets’ publishing content from their own in house fact checkers -- they are protected by freedom of the press. But third party independent fact checkers are another story entirely.
Really, FOX? Because as everyone else sees it, the fact-checkers are press too. And FOX wants them shut down by government force.
So what can be done about this dangerous situation? A new bill before the Michigan House of Representatives is a move in the right direction. The bill would require fact checkers to register with the government and carry insurance to cover payment to those who suffer financial damages as a result of a bogus fact check.
So when FOX says a Democrat lies, that would be a fact check, so they'd have to register with the government.
Yeah, right.
So, how many conservatives agree with FOX, and say that government should ban any fact-checkers not approved by the government?
Well, tell me, Slade, what did CNN do to forge a good relationship with Trump? You act like CNN is an innocent bystander at whom Trump threw bombs for no reason.Be cause Biden has forged a much better relationship with CNN and he doesn’t lie to the American people nearly as much as TrumpWhy hasn't the CNN fact checker been heard from since BIden's inauguration?
Nobody said that but you. You're projecting your desire to control the media.See? in favor of criminalizing the truth."Liberals" want to spout their propaganda with no repercussions.In other words,,,I wish I was making this up, but no, FOX News really is going that Stalinist. Since they're getting embarrassed by fact-checkers, they want fact-checking made illegal unless fact-checkers get a government license.
...David Marcus: Nobody is checking the social media fact checkers. It's time that changed
Throughout the past year biased fact checking has done irreparable harm to the body politic.
So, how many conservatives agree with FOX, and say that government should ban any fact-checkers not approved by the government?
"conservatives" want to criminalize the truth.
Sure would make their lives easier.
Sure would make their lives easier.
They are beyond help.
THE GOVERNMENT WOULD NEVER LIE TO US JUST COMFORM AND DO WHAT YOUR TOLD AND NEVER QUESTION ITNew information come in and the wise man adjusts to that new information.Is Fauci for masks or against them this week? Did the virus come from China or didn't it this week?Back in the 50s some doctors ACTUALLY recommended smoking.Problem is that social media such as Facebook and twitter isn't really checking facts, they are picking a side and censoring the other. For examples, FB will censor actual MDs that have counter views about who should get the covid vaccine. Are FB's fact checkers actual MDs that are qualified to fact check other MDs.....I don't think so.
Of course they had an ulterior motive bond medicine.
Much like the doctors you're referencing.
FB and others are acting responsibly in not acting as a conduit for false information that may kill people.
New information comes in and the fool calls the old information lies and continues to just stupid up the place.
"tell me again daddy how wearing masks makes COVID worse."
Who’s fact checking the fact checkers?I wish I was making this up, but no, FOX News really is going that Stalinist. Since they're getting embarrassed by fact-checkers, they want fact-checking made illegal unless fact-checkers get a government license.
David Marcus: Nobody is checking the social media fact checkers. It's time that changed
Throughout the past year biased fact checking has done irreparable harm to the body politic.
From the article:
The real problem here is not that fact checkers got something wrong, it’s that they have the power to censor what journalism Americans see and consume unilaterally.
Yes, yes, the standard conservative "Pointing out that I lied is censoring me!" argument.
The First Amendment rightly renders government powerless to regulate news outlets’ publishing content from their own in house fact checkers -- they are protected by freedom of the press. But third party independent fact checkers are another story entirely.
Really, FOX? Because as everyone else sees it, the fact-checkers are press too. And FOX wants them shut down by government force.
So what can be done about this dangerous situation? A new bill before the Michigan House of Representatives is a move in the right direction. The bill would require fact checkers to register with the government and carry insurance to cover payment to those who suffer financial damages as a result of a bogus fact check.
So when FOX says a Democrat lies, that would be a fact check, so they'd have to register with the government.
Yeah, right.
So, how many conservatives agree with FOX, and say that government should ban any fact-checkers not approved by the government?
JUST REPEAT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU TO SAY NOBODY SAID YOU COULD THINK FOR YOURSELFNot allowing you and yours to lie on their platform says nothing about their politics.That's fine, but lets loose the pretense that they are neutral and open platform.Facebook can allow or not allow whatever the hell they want on their site. Why do you care how they run their business?Thanks for the admission that facebook is not qualified to fact check MDs.FB is qualified to decide what will and will not be broadcast to the public using their service.So facebook is qualified to practice medicine.....give me a break!Back in the 50s some doctors ACTUALLY recommended smoking.Problem is that social media such as Facebook and twitter isn't really checking facts, they are picking a side and censoring the other. For examples, FB will censor actual MDs that have counter views about who should get the covid vaccine. Are FB's fact checkers actual MDs that are qualified to fact check other MDs.....I don't think so.
Of course they had an ulterior motive bond medicine.
Much like the doctors you're referencing.
FB and others are acting responsibly in not acting as a conduit for false information that may kill people.
If you don't like it
Build your own FB.
Perhaps if you guys would try a little truth for a change?
They hate it because they don't control it, and it exposes people to scary dangerous bad ideas.if you democrats hate fox so freaking much...just stop watching...and If I choose to watch it why do you hate CHOICE so freaking much?????????????????????????????I wish I was making this up, but no, FOX News really is going that Stalinist. Since they're getting embarrassed by fact-checkers, they want fact-checking made illegal unless fact-checkers get a government license.
David Marcus: Nobody is checking the social media fact checkers. It's time that changed
Throughout the past year biased fact checking has done irreparable harm to the body politic.
From the article:
The real problem here is not that fact checkers got something wrong, it’s that they have the power to censor what journalism Americans see and consume unilaterally.
Yes, yes, the standard conservative "Pointing out that I lied is censoring me!" argument.
The First Amendment rightly renders government powerless to regulate news outlets’ publishing content from their own in house fact checkers -- they are protected by freedom of the press. But third party independent fact checkers are another story entirely.
Really, FOX? Because as everyone else sees it, the fact-checkers are press too. And FOX wants them shut down by government force.
So what can be done about this dangerous situation? A new bill before the Michigan House of Representatives is a move in the right direction. The bill would require fact checkers to register with the government and carry insurance to cover payment to those who suffer financial damages as a result of a bogus fact check.
So when FOX says a Democrat lies, that would be a fact check, so they'd have to register with the government.
Yeah, right.
So, how many conservatives agree with FOX, and say that government should ban any fact-checkers not approved by the government?
Down here in Florida at St Augustine, Old Glory that has flown on the bridge every year for Memorial Day, will not be flown this year....want to know why? Because last year the queers didnt get to fly their rainbow flag so sued the city and now no flag will be flown...What opinion I am forcing on you again?We still want small government and let the people decide what is right and wrong...unlike you who must force you opinions on everyone.These phony cucks are all about small government until they suddenly aren’t anymore.
You cucks claim to want small government only go rushing off to the gobmint the second it becomes politically convenient to do so. The only person you are fooling is yourself.
Shame you fuckers cant be United States citizens, but fly your own shitstain flag...Just like BLM/ISIS..."The City of St. Augustine would love to have the American flags on the bridge! But legally we can't do it to the exclusion of others," Ron Brown, the City of St. Augustine's attorney, said emphatically.
The issue goes back almost a decade. That's when the Department of Transportation gave the City of St. Augustine the authority to provide permits to groups who wanted to fly their own individual flags.
When the city did not allow one group to fly its flag, the city was sued. A court order followed, ordering the city to fly the rainbow flag during a gay rights event.
None of that has anything to do with me you doddering old twat, so I’m am going fuck your feelings like my neighbor’s flag told me to do.Down here in Florida at St Augustine, Old Glory that has flown on the bridge every year for Memorial Day, will not be flown this year....want to know why? Because last year the queers didnt get to fly their rainbow flag so sued the city and now no flag will be flown...What opinion I am forcing on you again?We still want small government and let the people decide what is right and wrong...unlike you who must force you opinions on everyone.These phony cucks are all about small government until they suddenly aren’t anymore.
You cucks claim to want small government only go rushing off to the gobmint the second it becomes politically convenient to do so. The only person you are fooling is yourself.
All Flags Remain Banned From Bridge of Lions
ST. AUGUSTINE, Fla. -- From the top of the Bridge of Lions, you'll see different flags flapping around the area. However, there are no flags actually flying on the bridge - not even the the Flag of the United States. Many people say that's just ...staugustine.firstcoastnews.com
Shame you fuckers cant be United States citizens, but fly your own shitstain flag...Just like BLM/ISIS..."The City of St. Augustine would love to have the American flags on the bridge! But legally we can't do it to the exclusion of others," Ron Brown, the City of St. Augustine's attorney, said emphatically.
The issue goes back almost a decade. That's when the Department of Transportation gave the City of St. Augustine the authority to provide permits to groups who wanted to fly their own individual flags.
When the city did not allow one group to fly its flag, the city was sued. A court order followed, ordering the city to fly the rainbow flag during a gay rights event.
Trump was blaming and demonizing China for the Virus. He always needs an enemy. The reason these things were being flagged is because no evidence was being provided to back them up and in the mean time hate crimes against Asians was spiking. Let’s face facts, Trump cried wolf way too many times to be believed. To make claims like this he needs to show evidence or he isnt going to be taken seriously even if they turn out to be true down the road.I’ve heard both sides of the debate but I’m asking you specifically what you want them to be sued for? Give some examplesYOU CAN'T SUE THEM. They are not like any other company.Special protections? Which special protections are they getting that you think are unfair?Because you can't sue a platform. They can market themselves anyway they want... I agree... But right now they get special protections from the government not even given to the MSM.Who cares what pretense they use? It’s all user content anyway. They’re going to market And brand themselves how ever they want, I don’t see why you care.
We have talked about this before. Just.. Google "Platform vs Publisher" ... Obviously anything I say isn't working.
Last year I posted on Facebook an article from a Chinese Dr. who said that COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan Viral laboratory. Facebook slapped a qualifier on the post saying that was false. You had to click on the X to remove that qualifier before you could read the article.
President Trump said that last year and was slammed be the media. Except for Fox News who covered it fairly.
Now it is proving to be true and the "main stream media" and "fact checkers" are scrambling to cover their behinds.
The same goes for the Collusion story for four years, proven false.
The Steel Dossier. MSM and Fact Checkers said it was true and ridiculed and denigrated President Trump for four years. Proven to be fake.
As for the Hunter Biden hard drives, Hunter and the FBI say they are authentic.
More?
www.oneindia.com
They are a monopoly, time for them to be busted up like Ma BellFacebook can allow or not allow whatever the hell they want on their site. Why do you care how they run their business?Thanks for the admission that facebook is not qualified to fact check MDs.FB is qualified to decide what will and will not be broadcast to the public using their service.So facebook is qualified to practice medicine.....give me a break!Back in the 50s some doctors ACTUALLY recommended smoking.Problem is that social media such as Facebook and twitter isn't really checking facts, they are picking a side and censoring the other. For examples, FB will censor actual MDs that have counter views about who should get the covid vaccine. Are FB's fact checkers actual MDs that are qualified to fact check other MDs.....I don't think so.
Of course they had an ulterior motive bond medicine.
Much like the doctors you're referencing.
FB and others are acting responsibly in not acting as a conduit for false information that may kill people.
If you don't like it
Build your own FB.
WTF are you imbibing?You mean like the Russians planted the Hunter Biden Laptop..... yeah....right.Not allowing you and yours to lie on their platform says nothing about their politics.That's fine, but lets loose the pretense that they are neutral and open platform.Facebook can allow or not allow whatever the hell they want on their site. Why do you care how they run their business?Thanks for the admission that facebook is not qualified to fact check MDs.FB is qualified to decide what will and will not be broadcast to the public using their service.So facebook is qualified to practice medicine.....give me a break!Back in the 50s some doctors ACTUALLY recommended smoking.Problem is that social media such as Facebook and twitter isn't really checking facts, they are picking a side and censoring the other. For examples, FB will censor actual MDs that have counter views about who should get the covid vaccine. Are FB's fact checkers actual MDs that are qualified to fact check other MDs.....I don't think so.
Of course they had an ulterior motive bond medicine.
Much like the doctors you're referencing.
FB and others are acting responsibly in not acting as a conduit for false information that may kill people.
If you don't like it
Build your own FB.
Perhaps if you guys would try a little truth for a change?
BWAHAHAHANobody said that but you. You're projecting your desire to control the media.See? in favor of criminalizing the truth."Liberals" want to spout their propaganda with no repercussions.In other words,,,I wish I was making this up, but no, FOX News really is going that Stalinist. Since they're getting embarrassed by fact-checkers, they want fact-checking made illegal unless fact-checkers get a government license.
...David Marcus: Nobody is checking the social media fact checkers. It's time that changed
Throughout the past year biased fact checking has done irreparable harm to the body politic.
So, how many conservatives agree with FOX, and say that government should ban any fact-checkers not approved by the government?
"conservatives" want to criminalize the truth.
Sure would make their lives easier.
Sure would make their lives easier.
They are beyond help.
Free speech is supported by conservatives, not leftists.
From Jan 21 2017 to Jan 20, 2021 the government led by Trump lied to us each and every day and you did, in fact, conform and do exactly what Trump, in his lies, told you to do.THE GOVERNMENT WOULD NEVER LIE TO US JUST COMFORM AND DO WHAT YOUR TOLD AND NEVER QUESTION ITNew information come in and the wise man adjusts to that new information.Is Fauci for masks or against them this week? Did the virus come from China or didn't it this week?Back in the 50s some doctors ACTUALLY recommended smoking.Problem is that social media such as Facebook and twitter isn't really checking facts, they are picking a side and censoring the other. For examples, FB will censor actual MDs that have counter views about who should get the covid vaccine. Are FB's fact checkers actual MDs that are qualified to fact check other MDs.....I don't think so.
Of course they had an ulterior motive bond medicine.
Much like the doctors you're referencing.
FB and others are acting responsibly in not acting as a conduit for false information that may kill people.
New information comes in and the fool calls the old information lies and continues to just stupid up the place.
"tell me again daddy how wearing masks makes COVID worse."
I'll pass, bootlicker.
Says the Trumpinista dutifully spewing Trump lies as if they were coming from "on high."JUST REPEAT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU TO SAY NOBODY SAID YOU COULD THINK FOR YOURSELFNot allowing you and yours to lie on their platform says nothing about their politics.That's fine, but lets loose the pretense that they are neutral and open platform.Facebook can allow or not allow whatever the hell they want on their site. Why do you care how they run their business?Thanks for the admission that facebook is not qualified to fact check MDs.FB is qualified to decide what will and will not be broadcast to the public using their service.So facebook is qualified to practice medicine.....give me a break!Back in the 50s some doctors ACTUALLY recommended smoking.Problem is that social media such as Facebook and twitter isn't really checking facts, they are picking a side and censoring the other. For examples, FB will censor actual MDs that have counter views about who should get the covid vaccine. Are FB's fact checkers actual MDs that are qualified to fact check other MDs.....I don't think so.
Of course they had an ulterior motive bond medicine.
Much like the doctors you're referencing.
FB and others are acting responsibly in not acting as a conduit for false information that may kill people.
If you don't like it
Build your own FB.
Perhaps if you guys would try a little truth for a change?
The appropriate question would be what did Trump do to forge a good relationship with CNN? The answer is nothingWell, tell me, Slade, what did CNN do to forge a good relationship with Trump? You act like CNN is an innocent bystander at whom Trump threw bombs for no reason.Be cause Biden has forged a much better relationship with CNN and he doesn’t lie to the American people nearly as much as TrumpWhy hasn't the CNN fact checker been heard from since BIden's inauguration?
Of course they are. The FOX News opinion guy just endorsed the idea that fact-checkers should be required to get a government license. That would include enforcment options if they did _not_ get such a license.No one is proposing "criminalizing fact checkers" .....
Your thread title is just another Leftist LIE. !!!!
Anyone who wants to. And we liberals think that's great. Unlike the authoritarians of the right, we feel no urge to use the heavy hand of government to crush dissent.Who’s fact checking the fact checkers?
