Fox And Issa Claim There's A Difference Between An "Act Of Terror" And A Terrorist At

hazlnut

Gold Member
Sep 18, 2012
12,387
1,923
290
Chicago
Fox And Issa Claim There's A Difference Between An "Act Of Terror" And A Terrorist Attack


Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Fox News have come to the same conclusion -- describing the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya as an "act of terror" is different, and somehow less accurate, than describing them as a terrorist attack.

On September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attacks, Obama delivered a speech in the Rose Garden in which he referred to the attacks as an "act of terror," saying: "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for." The following day, Obama twice referred to the attacks as an act of terror, once in Colorado and once in Las Vegas.

During an appearance on Fox News' America Live, Issa accused Obama of minimizing the attacks by referring to them as an "act of terror," saying: "An act of terror is different than a terrorist attack. The truth is, this was a terrorist attack."



Issa is such a pathetic idiot.

People are seeing right through his little dog and pony show, and he's getting desperate to stay relevant.

Fool.
 
Fox And Issa Claim There's A Difference Between An "Act Of Terror" And A Terrorist Attack


Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Fox News have come to the same conclusion -- describing the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya as an "act of terror" is different, and somehow less accurate, than describing them as a terrorist attack.

On September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attacks, Obama delivered a speech in the Rose Garden in which he referred to the attacks as an "act of terror," saying: "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for." The following day, Obama twice referred to the attacks as an act of terror, once in Colorado and once in Las Vegas.

During an appearance on Fox News' America Live, Issa accused Obama of minimizing the attacks by referring to them as an "act of terror," saying: "An act of terror is different than a terrorist attack. The truth is, this was a terrorist attack."



Issa is such a pathetic idiot.

People are seeing right through his little dog and pony show, and he's getting desperate to stay relevant.

Fool.

The attack wasn't described as an act of terrorism.

Obama didn't admit it when he was on Letterman, The View and with Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes on Sept. 12 he acknowledged he purposely avoided the using the word “terrorism:”

KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.”

OBAMA: “Right.”

KROFT: “Do you believe that this was a terrorist attack?”

OBAMA: “Well, it’s too early to know exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.”

Eight days later, on Sept. 20, Obama was asked at a Univision town hall whether Benghazi was a terrorist attack related to al-Qaeda, after White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters that “it is self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.”

QUESTION: “We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al-Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?”

OBAMA: “Well, we’re still doing an investigation, and there are going to be different circumstances in different countries. And so I don’t want to speak to something until we have all the information. What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

Finally, during an interview on ABC’s “The View” on Sept. 25, Obama appeared to refuse to say it was a terrorist attack:

QUESTION: “It was reported that people just went crazy and wild because of this anti-Muslim movie -- or anti-Muhammad, I guess, movie. But then I heard Hillary Clinton say that it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?”

OBAMA: “We are still doing an investigation. There is no doubt that the kind of weapons that were used, the ongoing assault, that it wasn’t just a mob action. Now, we don’t have all the information yet so we are still gathering.”

Obama?s claim he called Benghazi an ?act of terrorism? - The Washington Post
 
Uhm, yea, ok.....
Washington Post


Whatever the reason, when given repeated opportunities to forthrightly declare this was an “act of terrorism,” the president ducked the question. For instance, on Sept. 12, immediately after the Rose Garden statement the day after the attack, Obama sat down with Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes and acknowledged he purposely avoided the using the word “terrorism:” KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.” OBAMA: “Right.” KROFT: “Do you believe that this was a terrorist attack?” OBAMA: “Well, it’s too early to know exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.”
 
Fox And Issa Claim There's A Difference Between An "Act Of Terror" And A Terrorist Attack


Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Fox News have come to the same conclusion -- describing the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya as an "act of terror" is different, and somehow less accurate, than describing them as a terrorist attack.

On September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attacks, Obama delivered a speech in the Rose Garden in which he referred to the attacks as an "act of terror," saying: "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for." The following day, Obama twice referred to the attacks as an act of terror, once in Colorado and once in Las Vegas.

During an appearance on Fox News' America Live, Issa accused Obama of minimizing the attacks by referring to them as an "act of terror," saying: "An act of terror is different than a terrorist attack. The truth is, this was a terrorist attack."



Issa is such a pathetic idiot.

People are seeing right through his little dog and pony show, and he's getting desperate to stay relevant.

Fool.

The attack wasn't described as an act of terrorism.

Obama didn't admit it when he was on Letterman, The View and with Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes on Sept. 12 he acknowledged he purposely avoided the using the word “terrorism:”

KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.”

OBAMA: “Right.”

KROFT: “Do you believe that this was a terrorist attack?”

OBAMA: “Well, it’s too early to know exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.”

Eight days later, on Sept. 20, Obama was asked at a Univision town hall whether Benghazi was a terrorist attack related to al-Qaeda, after White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters that “it is self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.”

QUESTION: “We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al-Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?”

OBAMA: “Well, we’re still doing an investigation, and there are going to be different circumstances in different countries. And so I don’t want to speak to something until we have all the information. What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

Finally, during an interview on ABC’s “The View” on Sept. 25, Obama appeared to refuse to say it was a terrorist attack:

QUESTION: “It was reported that people just went crazy and wild because of this anti-Muslim movie -- or anti-Muhammad, I guess, movie. But then I heard Hillary Clinton say that it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?”

OBAMA: “We are still doing an investigation. There is no doubt that the kind of weapons that were used, the ongoing assault, that it wasn’t just a mob action. Now, we don’t have all the information yet so we are still gathering.”

Obama?s claim he called Benghazi an ?act of terrorism? - The Washington Post

lol, you beat me to it
 
What a bunch of idiots.
Watch the speech for yourself. It's on You Tube.
He clearly called it terrorism. For all that it matters.

Man, you guys are absolutely destroying any credibility you may have had by trying to spin otherwise.

And trying to make an issue out of it - I'm just giving it to you straight - you look stupid.
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread
 
What a bunch of idiots.
Watch the speech for yourself. It's on You Tube.
He clearly called it terrorism. For all that it matters.

Man, you guys are absolutely destroying any credibility you may have had by trying to spin otherwise.

And trying to make an issue out of it - I'm just giving it to you straight - you look stupid.

It will not matter that there is video and audio of the President calling Benghazi an "act of terror"....they will pretend it doesn't exist because it doesn't fit their scenario.
 
What a bunch of idiots.
Watch the speech for yourself. It's on You Tube.
He clearly called it terrorism. For all that it matters.

Man, you guys are absolutely destroying any credibility you may have had by trying to spin otherwise.

And trying to make an issue out of it - I'm just giving it to you straight - you look stupid.

It will not matter that there is video and audio of the President calling Benghazi an "act of terror"....they will pretend it doesn't exist because it doesn't fit their scenario.

And it just blows me away that people will convince themselves that their own eyes and ears are lying to them in order to remain faithful to the party meme.
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?
 
What a bunch of idiots.
Watch the speech for yourself. It's on You Tube.
He clearly called it terrorism. For all that it matters.

Man, you guys are absolutely destroying any credibility you may have had by trying to spin otherwise.

And trying to make an issue out of it - I'm just giving it to you straight - you look stupid.

Then why didn't he say that in the weeks following by the many people that asked him outright if it was terrorism?

He had numerous chances to call it terrorism yet he didn't.

Why did he send Rice out to blame it on a video?

Why did he and Hillary tell the victim's family it was the video?

Why do you insist on keeping your head stuck up Obama's ass?
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?


Wow so the story changes.....

You really buy that it caused any of that violence? OMG I'm dealing with Forest Gump's more retarded brother.

Muslims protesting on 9/11 after Bin Laden dies and you think its about a video....

wait for it
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?

No no ...
You've got it all wrong.
You are suppose to swallow THEIR talking points without evidence.
You atre to assume that what they say is correct. They've never been wrong before, now have they?
 
What a bunch of idiots.
Watch the speech for yourself. It's on You Tube.
He clearly called it terrorism. For all that it matters.

Man, you guys are absolutely destroying any credibility you may have had by trying to spin otherwise.

And trying to make an issue out of it - I'm just giving it to you straight - you look stupid.

It will not matter that there is video and audio of the President calling Benghazi an "act of terror"....they will pretend it doesn't exist because it doesn't fit their scenario.

Just like the White House and State Department editing talking points 12 times won't fit yours. Time to accept reality!
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?

No no ...
You've got it all wrong.
You are suppose to swallow THEIR talking points without evidence.

It seems like you want to post yours without any evidence.
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?


Wow so the story changes.....

You really buy that it caused any of that violence? OMG I'm dealing with Forest Gump's more retarded brother.

Muslims protesting on 9/11 after Bin Laden dies and you think its about a video....

wait for it
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Ah, a grand conspiricy of the entire Western Media. :huddle:

:popcorn:
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?

How is this for evidence?

130504-benghazi-timeline.gif
 
What a bunch of idiots.
Watch the speech for yourself. It's on You Tube.
He clearly called it terrorism. For all that it matters.

Man, you guys are absolutely destroying any credibility you may have had by trying to spin otherwise.

And trying to make an issue out of it - I'm just giving it to you straight - you look stupid.

Considering the source, this should be considered a compliment. For the befuddled:

A Terrorist is a member of a group using terror as a means towards a political end.

An Act of Terror is a seemingly random attack on a large group of people. For example Sandy Hook was an act of terror, but the perpetrator was not a terrorist.

Comprende?
 
The OP still believes a video caused BenGhazi...but dont worry, he's a pussy and wont return to the thread

And what evidence do you have that proves the video that inspired protests,riots and deaths throughout the Muslim world was not the movtivating factor in the attacks on the American Consulate and the CIA Annex?

How is this for evidence?

130504-benghazi-timeline.gif

One line is food for thought. Thanks.

Extremists don't speak for Libya - CNN.com

on the other hand.....

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/w...hazi-investigation.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper&
 

Forum List

Back
Top