Fourth Plea Deal: Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis reaches plea deal in Georgia election interference case

It's just more proof that the Democrat Party is a criminal cult

The Psychocrat's politically motivated indictments make the Democrat Party look like desperate buffoons.
These phony indictments are falling apart under minor legal scrutiny.
They are designed to be a nuisance.

None of it survives an appellate

Please refer to post nf.23.10.26 #11,629 to trglcrtsrdmb.23.10.24 #111 and respond accordingly.
 
Don't hold you breath for that lying bastard to do anything.
Act 9.

On or about the 25th day of November 2020, immediately after the meeting of

Pennsylvania legislators in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, where RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI and JENNA LYNN ELLIS appeared, spoke, and presented witnesses, DONALD JOHN TRUMP invited a group of the Pennsylvania legislators and others to meet with him at the White House. Later that day, DONALD JOHN TRUMP, MARK RANDALL MEADOWS, RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI, JENNA LYNN ELLIS and unindicted co-conspirators Individual 5 and Individual 6, whose identities are known to the Grand Jury, met with the group of Pennsylvania legislators at the White House and discussed holding a special session of the Pennsylvania General Assembly. These were overt acts in flirtherance ofthe conspiracy.
 
It's just more proof that the Democrat Party is a criminal cult.
Jenna Ellis is a white Christian Family nationalist and was a MAGA Trump worshipping knucklehead when she committed crimes so he could appoint some more extremist Christian leaning judges to the USSC.


Act 21. On or about the 2nd day of December 2020, RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI and JENNA LYNN ELLIS appeared, spoke, and presented witnesses at a meeting

of the Michigan House of Representatives Oversight Committee. During the meeting, RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI made false statements concerning fraud in the

November 3, 2020, presidential election in Michigan and solicited, requested, and importuned the Michigan legislators present at the meeting to unlawfully appoint presidential electors from Michigan. During the meeting, JENNA LYNN ELLIS solicited, requested, and importuned the Michigan legislators present at the meeting to unlawfully appoint presidential electors from Michigan. These were overt'acts in fiirtherance of the conspiracy.
 
Retard, a state's legislature asking to delay counting the votes is NOT electors coming from a state's legislature.

You're talking crazier than usual, gramps.
It is what it is, and as such, Pence should have deferred to their wishes. Get a brain.
 
prctctnst.23.10.25 #262

protectionist said: Nah. Representitives and Senators (over 100) sent letters to Pence to delay the certification, THAT is the crux of what happened, not al this this other sideline stuff. •••• Amazing that Pence ignored them (and th Constitution), and then claimed he was following the Constitution. :cuckoo:

Reply to prctctnst.23.10.25 #262 : Another Trump Lawyer and co-conspirator is John Eastman. Eastman is the connected criminal dot between fake electors and Mike Pence.

He wrote a memo explaining how the fake electors were to be used by Pence to overturn the election and have it handed to himself and Trump. A Coup,

By: CNN Updated 8:20 AM EDT, Tue September 21, 2021 21SEP21-EASTMANplan-00 TRUMP-Jan6-COUPattempt​
John Eastman, a conservative lawyer working with then-President Donald Trump's legal team, outlined in a two-page memo a scheme to try to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to subvert the Constitution and throw out the 2020 election results on January 6.​
1. VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate Pro Tempore Grassley, if Pence recuses himself), begins to open and count the ballots, starting with Alabama (without conceding that the procedure, specified by the Electoral Count Act, of going through the States alphabetically is required).​
2. When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act.​
3. At the end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States.​

The fake electors criminal conspiracy went only so far as it did because it could not get past Pence. Pence knew truth and refused to commit fraud with Trumo and his co-conspirators.

It’s easy to see where the fraud comes in just by reading the Eastman Memo with an honest and open independent mind.

Para 2. he {Pence} announces that he has multiple slates of electors,
and

Para 3. he {Pence} announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States,


There were no ongoing disputes or multiple slates of electors in any states after December 14 2029.

Pence knew the truth and he knew acting against truth and going along with the Eastman Plan would have meant Pence would have crossed the line and become part of DJT’s criminal conspiracy to defraud the states and the federal government for the purpose of staying in office for a second term.

nf.23.10.26 #266
FALSE! Did Eastman himself say the word "fake electors" or were those YOUR WORDS ? That's a rhetorical question. I'LL supply the answer. Those are YOUR words, not Eastman's.

In the first memo, Eastman described the constitutional and statutory process for opening and counting of electoral votes under the Twelfth Amendment and Electoral Count Act, alleging that the Electoral Count Act was unconstitutional. No mention of the words "fake electors"

In the second memo, he laid out a more extensive plan with multiple scenarios for Pence to take to overturn Biden's election. No mention of "fake electors"

Only thing "fake" is your post.
 
It is what it is, and as such, Pence should have deferred to their wishes. Get a brain.

LOL

What it's not was your bullshit claim that Trump's electors came from the state legislatures. They didn't which is why you couldn't prove they did.
 
FALSE! Did Eastman himself say the word "fake electors" or were those YOUR WORDS ? That's a rhetorical question. I'LL supply the answer. Those are YOUR words, not Eastman's.

In the first memo, Eastman described the constitutional and statutory process for opening and counting of electoral votes under the Twelfth Amendment and Electoral Count Act, alleging that the Electoral Count Act was unconstitutional. No mention of the words "fake electors"

In the second memo, he laid out a more extensive plan with multiple scenarios for Pence to take to overturn Biden's election. No mention of "fake electors"

Only thing "fake" is your post.

LOLOLOLOL

 
NotfooledbyW said: You are an idiot: It’s over. You are irrelevant.

image.jpg.webp

It's over: âSafe harborâ provision secures Joe Bidenâs Electoral College win

All US states except Wisconsin appear to have met a deadline under federal law to resolve disputes arising from the November 3 presidential election, thereby ensuring Joe Biden's victory, the Associated Press reports.Tuesday is the so-called safe harbor deadline for states to resolve disputes...
www.rawstory.com

All US states except Wisconsin appear to have met a deadline under federal law to resolve disputes arising from the November 3 presidential election, thereby ensuring Joe Biden’s victory, the Associated Press reports.

Tuesday is the so-called safe harbor deadline for states to resolve disputes arising from the election. Under US law, Congress will consider a state’s election result to be “conclusive” if it is finalized by the safe harbor date.




They had 2 months to investigate. They chose not to.
JUST WANT TO REITERATE YOUR TRUTH BASED ON FACTS LAW AND US CONSTITUTION.

December 14 in 2020 was by law the deadline for states to certify their elections by naming the winner of the most votes and selecting the electors to choose the winner by name and political party to become Prez and VP on Jan6. There ARE NO court challenges by the loser party to be entertained for the purpose of changing a certified slate of each states’ electors after that @safe harbor” date.

!!!! SEE POST nf.20.12.08 #59 quoted at top. !!!

It is why Gore conceded his loss on or about December 14 2000 when USSC decided the outcome for W and the oilman DICK. THE pressure to end disputes and court battles in Florida by mid December so Florida’s electors would participate in the Jan6 counting the electors by Gore in same role as Pence had in 2020.

It was not up to the will of the loser to challenge a loss until the end of eternity. It simply has to be over leaving enough critical weeks for the entire nation to witness the peaceful transfer of power on Inauguration Day since George Washington presided over the first one handing the reins to John Adam’s then to Jefferson then to Madison until an asshole named Donald Trump forked that tradition in the ass. The disgusting demophile that he is.

nf.23.10.27 #292 to fvvn.23.10.27 #290
 
Last edited:
Independentthinker said: There is nothing against the law in making false statements about election fraud at a press conference at the Republican National Committee Headquarters. Democrats have had decades of making false statements about election fraud.

There would be law-breaking Saint Independentthinker if a first term Democrat President had lost a reelection campaign and then made false statements about election fraud in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy to remain in office beyond the constitutional end of said presidency.

No Democrat or any other POTUS has organized a criminal enterprise to further his self interest through fraudulent means to remain in power and undermine the Constitution they swore to uphold.

It has never come close to happening until Saint Trump came along. Just as Saint ding He will tell you. He always knows the truths we must all live by.


nf.23.20.26 #272 to ndpndntthnkr.23.10.26 #271
The only thing saint ding will tell you is that abortion should be a misdemeanor. Which is a win win for everyone.
 
What it's not was your bullshit claim that Trump's electors came from the state legislatures. They didn't which is why you couldn't prove they did.
They did, as the state legislatures backed them in their letters to Pence. Ho hum.
 
JUST WANT TO REITERATE YOUR TRUTH BASED ON FACTS LAW AND US CONSTITUTION.

December 14 in 2020 was by law the deadline for states to certify their elections by naming the winner of the most votes and selecting the electors to choose the winner by name and political party to become Prez and VP on Jan6. There ARE NO court challenges by the loser party to be entertained for the purpose of changing a certified slate of each states’ electors after that @safe harbor” date.

!!!! SEE POST nf.20.12.08 #59 quoted at top. !!!

It is why Gore conceded his loss on or about December 14 2000 when USSC decided the outcome for W and the oilman DICK. THE pressure to end disputes and court battles in Florida by mid December so Florida’s electors would participate in the Jan6 counting the electors by Gore in same role as Pence had in 2020.

It was not up to the will of the loser to challenge a loss until the end of eternity. It simply has to be over leaving enough critical weeks for the entire nation to witness the peaceful transfer of power on Inauguration Day since George Washington presided over the first one handing the reins to John Adam’s then to Jefferson then to Madison until an asshole named Donald Trump forked that tradition in the ass. The disgusting demophile that he is.

nf.23.10.27 #292 to fvvn.23.10.27 #290
Ths scenario in invalidated by the fact that the subject matter was tainted elction process. - all bets are off.
 

Forum List

Back
Top