Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

[bripat9643]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

 

[theHawk]

Mueller is a hack whose job was to smear the President's image.

Two years and he found nothing on President Trump, yet refused to investigate the obvious abuses of power by the Hussein administration when they spied on the Trump campaign before and after the election.

 

[Fueri]

I wonder if the same 'federal prosecutors' that signed that hit piece letter on Trump a couple of weeks ago will feel the same moral imperative to show their support for 'justice' in this case....

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

 

[theHawk]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

And yet the President is still being accused of “collusion” and now “obstruction” by the Democrat Congress-critters.

 

[NoVote]

Trump has them all tied in knots. LOL The tards call Trump a liar. He's not, he's a joker and they aren't getting it.

 

[bripat9643]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

 

[edward37]

1000 former prosecutors say trump if not president would be found guilty of obstruction The man is scum protected by another fat scumbag Barr

 

[Rambunctious]

1000 former prosecutors say trump if not president would be found guilty of obstruction The man is scum protected by another fat scumbag Barr

 

[Tehon]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

 

[BluesLegend]

And yet the President is still being accused of “collusion” and now “obstruction” by the Democrat Congress-critters.

Collusion, obstruction, AND a cover up. These filthy swine POS Dem's go on national tv and accuse the POTUS of crimes without any evidence. Hell an army of lawyers and FBI agents spent 2 years trying to find dirt on Trump and came up empty. Doesn't stop the Dem's they go right on lying.

 

[bripat9643]

1000 former prosecutors say trump if not president would be found guilty of obstruction The man is scum protected by another fat scumbag Barr

You mean 1000 sleazy lying douchebag Democrat prosecutors say that.

Only idiots are impressed.

 

[bripat9643]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

 

[Tehon]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

So why are you citing that ABA rule?

And how did Mueller denigrate Trump?

 

[bripat9643]

Watch all the leftwing douchebags in this forum defend Mueller's behavior, which the ABA code specifically prohibits:

Former prosecutors say Mueller statement violated American Bar Association rule

His final report and a statement on May 29 by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller surrounded a key finding of “no Trump-Moscow conspiracy” with innuendo and loaded language, news analysts and prosecutors said.

Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

Prosecutors and pundits alike said Robert Mueller shredded that rule at his May 29 press conference.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”

The Federalist reported that “multiple federal agents and prosecutors” expressed dismay at the former FBI director’s statement.​

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

So why are you citing that ABA rule?

And how did Mueller denigrate Trump?

Mueller belongs to the ABA,

 

[Tehon]

Mueller is not prosecuting Donald, and Donald is not charged with wrongdoing at this time.

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

So why are you citing that ABA rule?

And how did Mueller denigrate Trump?

Mueller belongs to the ABA,

But he is not prosecuting Trump.

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.

Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

 

[bripat9643]

If he's not prosecuting, then the code prohibits him from making "any extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.”

How fucking stupid are you?

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

So why are you citing that ABA rule?

And how did Mueller denigrate Trump?

Mueller belongs to the ABA,

But he is not prosecuting Trump.

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.

Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

He was obviously prosecuting Trump. "Obstruction of justice" is a crime.

 

[Tehon]

There is no "accused". So there is no infraction by Mueller, stupid.

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

So why are you citing that ABA rule?

And how did Mueller denigrate Trump?

Mueller belongs to the ABA,

But he is not prosecuting Trump.

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.

Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

He was obviously prosecuting Trump. "Obstruction of justice" is a crime.

When was Trump indicted? I must have missed that.

 

[edward37]

1000 former prosecutors say trump if not president would be found guilty of obstruction The man is scum protected by another fat scumbag Barr

You mean 1000 sleazy lying douchebag Democrat prosecutors say that.

Only idiots are impressed.

Yeah bri all were dems lol

 

[bripat9643]

There isn't an accused until someone has been indicted, shit for brains. Apparently you belief a prosecutor is allowed to denigrate a person who isn't even under suspicion.

So why are you citing that ABA rule?

And how did Mueller denigrate Trump?

Mueller belongs to the ABA,

But he is not prosecuting Trump.

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.

Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

He was obviously prosecuting Trump. "Obstruction of justice" is a crime.

When was Trump indicted? I must have missed that.

You don't have to be indicted to be accused. Anyone under investigation is "the accused."