Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,718
27,675
2,430

Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom

4 Nov 2023 ~~ By Eden Villalovas

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC.
Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to make an exception to the longstanding rule that prohibits broadcasting and photographing criminal proceedings in federal courts under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.
Prosecutors are trying to uphold the rule that states, “the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings” or broadcasting those proceedings unless a judge rules otherwise.
House Democrats have also pushed for live broadcasting of the court proceedings in the criminal cases against Trump. The former president's defense attorney John Lauro agrees, telling Fox News Sunday in August he “would love to see that.”
“I personally would love to see that,” Lauro said. “I’m convinced the Biden administration does not want the American people to see the truth. And they acted on it by filing this protective order, which is an effort to keep important information about this case from the press.”
Chutkan gave Trump a week to respond to the media request, which he has yet to do, but Smith’s court filing notes that the former president’s counsel “has requested that government counsel convey that he takes no position with respect to these Applications.”
On Aug. 1, Trump was indicted in connection to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Smith’s years long investigation...
~Snip~
Despite the Justice Department rejecting calls for his trials to be televised, a large majority, 71%, think television cameras should be allowed in the courtroom for this specific trial, according to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted shortly after Trump’s indictment.


Commentary:
The big question that the public asks is; What is the Judge and prosecution afraid of?
Sunshine never hurt anything. It makes everything cleaner and open eyed.
Just what is the DoJ, Smith and Chutkan trying to hide from the public?
Are they hiding the sham and how unjust their courtroom is?
Is it their idea that what people can’t see and hear they can get their Quisling Media to frame the false narrative?
Remember the Sixth Amendment:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense".
 

Trump prosecutors putting up a fight to keep cameras out of courtroom

4 Nov 2023 ~~ By Eden Villalovas

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC.
Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to make an exception to the longstanding rule that prohibits broadcasting and photographing criminal proceedings in federal courts under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.
Prosecutors are trying to uphold the rule that states, “the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings” or broadcasting those proceedings unless a judge rules otherwise.
House Democrats have also pushed for live broadcasting of the court proceedings in the criminal cases against Trump. The former president's defense attorney John Lauro agrees, telling Fox News Sunday in August he “would love to see that.”
“I personally would love to see that,” Lauro said. “I’m convinced the Biden administration does not want the American people to see the truth. And they acted on it by filing this protective order, which is an effort to keep important information about this case from the press.”
Chutkan gave Trump a week to respond to the media request, which he has yet to do, but Smith’s court filing notes that the former president’s counsel “has requested that government counsel convey that he takes no position with respect to these Applications.”
On Aug. 1, Trump was indicted in connection to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Smith’s years long investigation...
~Snip~
Despite the Justice Department rejecting calls for his trials to be televised, a large majority, 71%, think television cameras should be allowed in the courtroom for this specific trial, according to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted shortly after Trump’s indictment.


Commentary:
The big question that the public asks is; What is the Judge and prosecution afraid of?
Sunshine never hurt anything. It makes everything cleaner and open eyed.
Just what is the DoJ, Smith and Chutkan trying to hide from the public?
Are they hiding the sham and how unjust their courtroom is?
Is it their idea that what people can’t see and hear they can get their Quisling Media to frame the false narrative?
Remember the Sixth Amendment:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense".
They don't want tRump to turn it into a circus.
 
A circus is a huge step up from the current fucking Biden Body Double Obama Third term Clown Show
derp.jpg
 
In the filing in August that the judge requested from both sides on the issue of cameras in the courtroom, the prosecution requested the trial follow the federal court rules.....no cameras.

The Trump team filed that they did not care which way....tv or no tv. They DID NOT ARGUE for Tv cameras at the filing nor with the prosecution team when they met to discuss.

Then the media put in a request for tv......the prosecution argued to just follow the federal rules and the Trump Lawyers never replied to the judge request for their opinion.

From your linked article:




Chutkan gave Trump a week to respond to the media request, which he has yet to do, but Smith’s court filing notes that the former president’s counsel “has requested that government counsel convey that he takes no position with respect to these Applications.”
 
do ypou have a law that restricts a fed trial from being televised??
It's a Federal Court Rule....all federal trials do not allow TVs in the courtroom.... Google it.

We can make a request that it is televised and the presiding judge decides....but it is not common for a judge to make an exception that goes against the federal regulation.
 
It's a Federal Court Rule....all federal trials do not allow TVs in the courtroom.... Google it.

We can make a request that it is televised and the presiding judge decides....but it is not common for a judge to make an exception that goes against the federal regulation.
so why did you say there was a law against it when there isnt??
 

Forum List

Back
Top