JustTheFacts
Rookie
- Dec 28, 2012
- 681
- 59
- 0
- Banned
- #61
I was speaking only to the theory that the 2nd is limited to weapons that could be handled by individuals.
It is. That is why it is limited to arms the individual can bear. All the other extreme examples you use are prohibited by law, the Constitutionality of which is not at issue.
and again, those words are not found in the 2nd. Some judges have simply decided they were implied and ruled it that way, and THAT is why so many people are arguing about what the founding fathers really mean.
Much better to actually spell it out with a new amendment.