For those that support banning 'assault weapns'

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by M14 Shooter, Jan 10, 2013.

  1. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,218
    Thanks Received:
    1,766
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,572
    The 1994 'assault weapon' ban covered semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines that included two or more of the following accessories:

    -Folding or telescoping stock
    -Pistol grip
    -Bayonet mount
    -Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
    -Muzzle device which enables the launching or firing of rifle grenades

    Can any of the supporters of this ban, or those who would reinstate it, explain with specificity what about any combination of the listed accessories create a rifle that should not be in the hands of the general public?

    What compelling state interest is there in banning rifles with these accessories, and how is the ban in question the least restrictive means to meet that interest?
     
  2. Desperado
    Offline

    Desperado Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    6,154
    Thanks Received:
    1,205
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,778
    Because looks are more important than performance.
    The cosmetic items you list make the gun look scary
    Common sense has left the building when it comes to guns now.
     
  3. gallantwarrior
    Offline

    gallantwarrior Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    20,989
    Thanks Received:
    4,320
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    On my own 200 acres of the Frozen North
    Ratings:
    +8,993
    And no one hunts with scary guns, so they really shouldn't have them.

    I'm thinking someplace overrun with liberal bloodsuckers like Chick-ah-goh might just make a perfect target-rich environment.
     
  4. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    70,772
    Thanks Received:
    12,791
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +32,108
    Hollywood loves scary guns.

    "Say hello to my little friend...."

    [​IMG]
     
  5. P F Tinmore
    Online

    P F Tinmore Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    39,645
    Thanks Received:
    1,783
    Trophy Points:
    1,080
    Ratings:
    +3,580
    "Assault weapons" is a propaganda term. There is no such thing.
     
  6. saveliberty
    Offline

    saveliberty Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2009
    Messages:
    49,172
    Thanks Received:
    7,163
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +29,854
    Well Mr. Shooter, they go bang really fast and my they have these really hot metal things flying out of them.
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    40,983
    Thanks Received:
    6,340
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,830
    Why do you bother asking real questions, the grabbers are not being objective and are not using either their brains or common sense. Hell the fact that less then 500 murders in a year are committed with ANY rifle, much less an "assault" rifle escapes their pea brains.


    And what I really love are the toadies that pretend to support the second demanding we acquiesce to more controls.

    The Supreme Court is clear. Military style weapons are what the 2nd protects. And it is an Individual right absent any membership in any type of Militia.

    They want to ban military type weapons? They need an amendment since case law and the facts and Constitution forbid it.
     
  8. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,218
    Thanks Received:
    1,766
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,572
    If this is the fullest extent of your response, it is very clear you do not understand the questions put to you.
     
  9. MaryL
    Offline

    MaryL Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    Messages:
    8,920
    Thanks Received:
    1,817
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Midwestern U.S.
    Ratings:
    +5,602
    It's becoming clear that firearms present more of a danger than what firearms were to protect us from in the first place. The question posed on this thread is absurd, when our own children are using firearms to slaughter each other. What the hardware is called or how it works is irrelevant. Do we really NEED the second amendment anymore? That would be the more pertinent question. Does this society really need firearms anymore?
     
  10. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    42,073
    Thanks Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +24,765
    Â…and what evidence does the government have in support of such a measure?
     

Share This Page