CockySOB
VIP Member
Redhots said:Why do you guys continue to make new threads about this issue after someone points out its all a bunch of hyped bullshit? This is like the third or fourth one I've seen.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/showpost.php?p=446347&postcount=30
Thanks for the kind gesture, but I think i'll go with David Kay on this one.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/22/AR2006062201475.html
Just let it go guys...
The shells contained mustard gas (of the distilled variety) and not sarin. David Kay is most likely correct that any sarin-based weapons are likely to have severely reduced capacity after years have passed, but the issue is not one of sarin-based weapons, but of mustard gas-based weapons.
So if I let it go, you'd remain the ignorant. Here you go trying to compare mustard gas to sarin, and that's wrong on so many fronts it's embarrassing for you. Hopefully you'll look into your misunderstanding and erroneous assuptions and find some enlightenment.