Florida spirals away from Trump

You need to keep up with current events.....read wikileaks...

You need to balance your reading, I suggest The Economist and TIME, i.e. real journalism v. agenda laden propaganda. Of course as a self proclaimed know-it-all and willfully ignorant person you will never challenge your beliefs, and thus will remain a faith based ideologue.

Time is "Real journalism"??

Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:

 
Someone has listened a lot of CNN, good drone, good drone!
 
We are witnessing the start of the burning carnage that is to come all across the country

From polling to early voting trends to TV ad spending to ground game, Donald Trump’s Florida fortunes are beginning to look so bleak that some Republicans are steeling themselves for what could be the equivalent of a “landslide” loss in the nation’s biggest battleground state.


And the excuses begin

Roger Stone, who also lives in Florida, fret. He blamed most of the campaign problems on the Trump campaign leadership in New York. He said the campaign didn’t give enough money and flexibility to its former Florida director Karen Giorno — who was moved in a campaign shakeup or to its current Florida campaign chief, Susie Wiles, who managed Gov. Rick Scott’s 2010 campaign.


Florida spirals away from Trump
Trump's Chumps are not the kind of people who vote early.

So it is too early to tell if Trump is really finished.

Although it is true that all the signs including all the polls averaged across the USA look bad for Trump, and the early voting is bad for him too, it is still too early to know for sure.

Utah has completely abandoned him now.

There is a good chance Florida and also Arizona will do the same.

One can only hope, at this point, however.


Don't know, when I went today there were a mess of trumpkins. But, then again this is Texas.
 
You need to keep up with current events.....read wikileaks...

You need to balance your reading, I suggest The Economist and TIME, i.e. real journalism v. agenda laden propaganda. Of course as a self proclaimed know-it-all and willfully ignorant person you will never challenge your beliefs, and thus will remain a faith based ideologue.

Time is "Real journalism"??

Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:



Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap
 
You need to keep up with current events.....read wikileaks...

You need to balance your reading, I suggest The Economist and TIME, i.e. real journalism v. agenda laden propaganda. Of course as a self proclaimed know-it-all and willfully ignorant person you will never challenge your beliefs, and thus will remain a faith based ideologue.

Time is "Real journalism"??

Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:



Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap


Q. (Wry) "How would you know since you've never read TIME"

A. (CrusaderFrank) "Rush and Sean told me so, TIME is an example of the dreaded MSM".
 
It doesn't make any difference whether Trump wins Florida or not, the same with Ohio; he could win both but Clinton will still be elected president.

Trump is wasting his time in each state, and it's too late to do anything about Virginia, where Trump has in essence given up.

Right liberwhack. Trump has tens of thousands at his rallies, the rapists wife can barely get 30. You are a tool, albeit a dull one.
jones is a pussy....care to comment jones?....
 
You need to keep up with current events.....read wikileaks...

You need to balance your reading, I suggest The Economist and TIME, i.e. real journalism v. agenda laden propaganda. Of course as a self proclaimed know-it-all and willfully ignorant person you will never challenge your beliefs, and thus will remain a faith based ideologue.

Time is "Real journalism"??

Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:



Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap


Q. (Wry) "How would you know since you've never read TIME"

A. (CrusaderFrank) "Rush and Sean told me so, TIME is an example of the dreaded MSM".

My doctor has Time in his office. Once in a great while there might be an interesting article in it, but I couldn't tell you when I read it last. There was a time, decades ago, when I subscribed to Time and had the NYTimes delivered daily
 
You need to balance your reading, I suggest The Economist and TIME, i.e. real journalism v. agenda laden propaganda. Of course as a self proclaimed know-it-all and willfully ignorant person you will never challenge your beliefs, and thus will remain a faith based ideologue.

Time is "Real journalism"??

Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:



Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap


Q. (Wry) "How would you know since you've never read TIME"

A. (CrusaderFrank) "Rush and Sean told me so, TIME is an example of the dreaded MSM".

My doctor has Time in his office. Once in a great while there might be an interesting article in it, but I couldn't tell you when I read it last. There was a time, decades ago, when I subscribed to Time and had the NYTimes delivered daily


Really, and then what? Were you were dropped on your head or did you catch the clap from some hippie?
 
Time is "Real journalism"??

Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:



Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap


Q. (Wry) "How would you know since you've never read TIME"

A. (CrusaderFrank) "Rush and Sean told me so, TIME is an example of the dreaded MSM".

My doctor has Time in his office. Once in a great while there might be an interesting article in it, but I couldn't tell you when I read it last. There was a time, decades ago, when I subscribed to Time and had the NYTimes delivered daily


Really, and then what? Were you were dropped on your head or did you catch the clap from some hippie?


Tried to be civil, I'm done with you for a while, Fredo
 
20,000 at a Trump rally in Tampa.

But mostly whites....... You don't have enough whites to elect your role model.
He is missing Hispanics, Asians, muslims, blacks and women.
I already guaranteed Hillary will win in Florida. And he is lucky if he gets 10 to 15% of Hispanic votes.



Education Level Emerges as Sharp Dividing Line in Clinton-Trump Race

Education Level Emerges as Sharp Dividing Line in Clinton-Trump Race
Clinton wins the college-educated segment by 25 percentage points, while Trump’s edge among those without a college education is 10 points.
John McCormickJohn McCormick
McCormickJohn
August 12, 2016 — 2:00 AM PDT
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Bloomberg Poll: Trump Trails Clinton by 6 in Two-Way Race
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment.
Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
“The presence or absence of a college degree is more predictive of the vote in this election than we’ve seen in past elections,” said pollster J. Ann Selzer, who oversees many political surveys for Bloomberg Politics.
 
Of course you've never read Time, and I doubt you have read anything which challenges you to think. In fact I have evidence, here is a video with you dressed in drag to prove my doubt:



Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap


Q. (Wry) "How would you know since you've never read TIME"

A. (CrusaderFrank) "Rush and Sean told me so, TIME is an example of the dreaded MSM".

My doctor has Time in his office. Once in a great while there might be an interesting article in it, but I couldn't tell you when I read it last. There was a time, decades ago, when I subscribed to Time and had the NYTimes delivered daily


Really, and then what? Were you were dropped on your head or did you catch the clap from some hippie?


Tried to be civil, I'm done with you for a while, Fredo


You "Tried" to be civil? An odd statement if one thinks about it. I'm always civil, with those who deserve to be treated with respect. Go back and review your history on this forum, and maybe you will open your mind and see why I don't have any respect for you.

You may be a good person in real life, but it does not play out on this message board. Here you are nothing more than a hack, someone who is completely predictable in putting forth the current meme. Just once you might vet an issue, post something substantive, thought provoking & thoughtful.
 
Seriously, who reads Time? It's total useless biased liberal Pravda crap

Q. (Wry) "How would you know since you've never read TIME"

A. (CrusaderFrank) "Rush and Sean told me so, TIME is an example of the dreaded MSM".
My doctor has Time in his office. Once in a great while there might be an interesting article in it, but I couldn't tell you when I read it last. There was a time, decades ago, when I subscribed to Time and had the NYTimes delivered daily

Really, and then what? Were you were dropped on your head or did you catch the clap from some hippie?

Tried to be civil, I'm done with you for a while, Fredo

You "Tried" to be civil? An odd statement if one thinks about it. I'm always civil, with those who deserve to be treated with respect. Go back and review your history on this forum, and maybe you will open your mind and see why I don't have any respect for you.

You may be a good person in real life, but it does not play out on this message board. Here you are nothing more than a hack, someone who is completely predictable in putting forth the current meme. Just once you might vet an issue, post something substantive, thought provoking & thoughtful.

Fair enough. I'll admit my provocative prior posting does tend to influence my attempts at pretending to be a decent person

Noted
 
We are witnessing the start of the burning carnage that is to come all across the country

From polling to early voting trends to TV ad spending to ground game, Donald Trump’s Florida fortunes are beginning to look so bleak that some Republicans are steeling themselves for what could be the equivalent of a “landslide” loss in the nation’s biggest battleground state.


And the excuses begin

Roger Stone, who also lives in Florida, fret. He blamed most of the campaign problems on the Trump campaign leadership in New York. He said the campaign didn’t give enough money and flexibility to its former Florida director Karen Giorno — who was moved in a campaign shakeup or to its current Florida campaign chief, Susie Wiles, who managed Gov. Rick Scott’s 2010 campaign.


Florida spirals away from Trump

Derp
 
20,000 at a Trump rally in Tampa.

But mostly whites....... You don't have enough whites to elect your role model.
He is missing Hispanics, Asians, muslims, blacks and women.
I already guaranteed Hillary will win in Florida. And he is lucky if he gets 10 to 15% of Hispanic votes.



Education Level Emerges as Sharp Dividing Line in Clinton-Trump Race

Education Level Emerges as Sharp Dividing Line in Clinton-Trump Race
Clinton wins the college-educated segment by 25 percentage points, while Trump’s edge among those without a college education is 10 points.
John McCormickJohn McCormick
McCormickJohn
August 12, 2016 — 2:00 AM PDT
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Bloomberg Poll: Trump Trails Clinton by 6 in Two-Way Race
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment.
Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
“The presence or absence of a college degree is more predictive of the vote in this election than we’ve seen in past elections,” said pollster J. Ann Selzer, who oversees many political surveys for Bloomberg Politics.


We shall see in a couple weeks. Hillary may win, if she does the country loses. The USA will become a large copy of failed European socialism and Islam will be the dominant religion in many US cities. Is that what you really want for your kids and grandkids?
 
20,000 at a Trump rally in Tampa.

But mostly whites....... You don't have enough whites to elect your role model.
He is missing Hispanics, Asians, muslims, blacks and women.
I already guaranteed Hillary will win in Florida. And he is lucky if he gets 10 to 15% of Hispanic votes.



Education Level Emerges as Sharp Dividing Line in Clinton-Trump Race

Education Level Emerges as Sharp Dividing Line in Clinton-Trump Race
Clinton wins the college-educated segment by 25 percentage points, while Trump’s edge among those without a college education is 10 points.
John McCormickJohn McCormick
McCormickJohn
August 12, 2016 — 2:00 AM PDT
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Bloomberg Poll: Trump Trails Clinton by 6 in Two-Way Race
There are many demographic fault lines emerging in this year’s presidential campaign, but few are deeper than the division among likely voters based on educational attainment.
Those with the least number of years of education are far more likely to support Donald Trump, while those who have had the most schooling are much more likely to back Hillary Clinton, according to a Bloomberg Politics national poll released this week.
“The presence or absence of a college degree is more predictive of the vote in this election than we’ve seen in past elections,” said pollster J. Ann Selzer, who oversees many political surveys for Bloomberg Politics.


We shall see in a couple weeks. Hillary may win, if she does the country loses. The USA will become a large copy of failed European socialism and Islam will be the dominant religion in many US cities. Is that what you really want for your kids and grandkids?

What we really want is for you to stop talking nonsense like a mental patient.
 

Forum List

Back
Top