- May 20, 2009
- 144,340
- 66,699
- 2,330
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At 96% CO2, Mars should be a sweat lodge
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
At 96% CO2, Mars should be a sweat lodge
yes but the co2 of mars is different then that of the earth
--LOL
it is also weird that for co2 being such a good insulator of heat
seeing the temp at the equator swing a hundred degrees
between noon and midnight martian time --LOL
Wheres the runaway Martian Greenhouse Effect?
Oh, right, it's only Earth based CO2 that does that
Wheres the runaway Martian Greenhouse Effect?
Oh, right, it's only Earth based CO2 that does that
another odd factoid
Mars has periodic "ice ages"
plus expanding and receding polar caps
similar to the earths
Wheres the runaway Martian Greenhouse Effect?
Oh, right, it's only Earth based CO2 that does that
another odd factoid
Mars has periodic "ice ages"
plus expanding and receding polar caps
similar to the earths
Surely you jest.
Ice ages are impossible in a 96% CO2 runaway Greenhouse atmosphere.
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
Wheres the runaway Martian Greenhouse Effect?
Oh, right, it's only Earth based CO2 that does that
another odd factoid
Mars has periodic "ice ages"
plus expanding and receding polar caps
similar to the earths
Its amazing that rise only appears AFTER homogenization and infilling of the data to higher temps. Yes, The bastardization of the temp record to keep the lie alive..
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
The GISS data I posted goes back to 1880. This graph, by Bill Weller of the Daily Mail (major scientific facility, the Daily Mail) goes back to 1997. It also looks very much like a crayon drawing as your mates so often accuse Skeptical Science of producing.
And, BTW, have you seen the ocean plot?
Hmmm... which way is that going Frank?
Its amazing that rise only appears AFTER homogenization and infilling of the data to higher temps. Yes, The bastardization of the temp record to keep the lie alive..
And your proof of this would be?
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
The GISS data I posted goes back to 1880. This graph, by Bill Weller of the Daily Mail (major scientific facility, the Daily Mail) goes back to 1997. It also looks very much like a crayon drawing as your mates so often accuse Skeptical Science of producing.
And, BTW, have you seen the ocean plot?
Hmmm... which way is that going Frank?
Unadjusted data sets show it cooling by o.3 deg C over the last 20 years. Why is that? Why do you use only adjusted and approved data sets from the alarmist camp? Real scientist look at both and ask why the discrepancies... Empirical evidence is not supporting you Crick, it's outing you as a deceiver.
Why wouldn't they? That isn't logical!^ After application of Mann's Hockey Stick Algorithm
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
The GISS data I posted goes back to 1880. This graph, by Bill Weller of the Daily Mail (major scientific facility, the Daily Mail) goes back to 1997. It also looks very much like a crayon drawing as your mates so often accuse Skeptical Science of producing.
And, BTW, have you seen the ocean plot?
Hmmm... which way is that going Frank?
Unadjusted data sets show it cooling by o.3 deg C over the last 20 years. Why is that? Why do you use only adjusted and approved data sets from the alarmist camp? Real scientist look at both and ask why the discrepancies... Empirical evidence is not supporting you Crick, it's outing you as a deceiver.
Erm, real scientists aren't publishing their results on Wattsupwiththat.com.
^ After application of Mann's Hockey Stick Algorithm
Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
The GISS data I posted goes back to 1880. This graph, by Bill Weller of the Daily Mail (major scientific facility, the Daily Mail) goes back to 1997. It also looks very much like a crayon drawing as your mates so often accuse Skeptical Science of producing.
And, BTW, have you seen the ocean plot?
Hmmm... which way is that going Frank?
Unadjusted data sets show it cooling by o.3 deg C over the last 20 years. Why is that? Why do you use only adjusted and approved data sets from the alarmist camp? Real scientist look at both and ask why the discrepancies... Empirical evidence is not supporting you Crick, it's outing you as a deceiver.
Erm, real scientists aren't publishing their results on Wattsupwiththat.com.
Why wouldn't they? That isn't logical!Mann's algorithm does not produce hockey sticks and Mann had no involvement in their production. Try again. Or not.
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
The GISS data I posted goes back to 1880. This graph, by Bill Weller of the Daily Mail (major scientific facility, the Daily Mail) goes back to 1997. It also looks very much like a crayon drawing as your mates so often accuse Skeptical Science of producing.
And, BTW, have you seen the ocean plot?
Hmmm... which way is that going Frank?
Unadjusted data sets show it cooling by o.3 deg C over the last 20 years. Why is that? Why do you use only adjusted and approved data sets from the alarmist camp? Real scientist look at both and ask why the discrepancies... Empirical evidence is not supporting you Crick, it's outing you as a deceiver.
Erm, real scientists aren't publishing their results on Wattsupwiththat.com.
It is a website, it holds documents it has people who go read documents on it why wouldn't that be a good place for people to go get science papers that's just so confusing in so many ways dude.Why wouldn't they? That isn't logical!
Without Manns Hockey stick algorithm
They call it "the Pause"
LOLz
The GISS data I posted goes back to 1880. This graph, by Bill Weller of the Daily Mail (major scientific facility, the Daily Mail) goes back to 1997. It also looks very much like a crayon drawing as your mates so often accuse Skeptical Science of producing.
And, BTW, have you seen the ocean plot?
Hmmm... which way is that going Frank?
Unadjusted data sets show it cooling by o.3 deg C over the last 20 years. Why is that? Why do you use only adjusted and approved data sets from the alarmist camp? Real scientist look at both and ask why the discrepancies... Empirical evidence is not supporting you Crick, it's outing you as a deceiver.
Erm, real scientists aren't publishing their results on Wattsupwiththat.com.
Because Watt is not a scientist, and wattsupwiththat is not an accredited peer reviewed scientific publication. It is a political blog, nothing more. It's hard to believe that you even asked that question.