First direct observation of carbon dioxide's greenhouse effect at Earth's surface

The graph does NOT show an increase of temperature all it shows is more CO2 which we already know. Further the graph and the supposed study does not prove that the increase was man made.

Where is the test that establishes that the amount of CO2 increase in the earths atmosphere caused any warming at all? No one has done one, no one is planning to do one and that proves that you dumb asses know it can not be proven.

I am assuming that you did not read the paper. Read the paper!

You didn't read it. It merely assumes the 22 ppm of co2 is all anthropogenic

They stopped the test in 2010 and they're reporting the results 5 years later?????


why is that important

--LOL

the sheeple have been told it means global warming

--LOL

what more evidence is needed then that

--LOL
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
 
--LOL

the atmosphere of Mars is a vacuum now a days

--LOL

--LOL


so the CO2 on Mars is different then that of the Earth

--LOL

oh brother

--LOL
 
You know Frank............on 4 different threads in the past 2 days, asked ANY AGW climate crusader to ditch the fancy colorful graphs and vague terms like "warming" and post up the average number............ in degrees................ the earth has warmed since 1998.

And guess what?

We haven't gotten dick!!!!!!!:coffee:



These people are professional frauds:spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::rock:

0.00 Deg C....

Its rather stunning that we can go back to 1996 and have NO DETERMINABLE WARMING.. !8 years 3 months of ZERO anomaly.
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
Major component? Where the fuck did you go to school?
atmgr.gif


Its a trace gas not a major component..
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
CO2 on earth is dwarfed by water vapor by a factor of 1000 times.. Minor changes in water vapor are a dampener and a negative feed back. Quite the opposite of what the modelers envisioned and why all models fail.
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
CO2 on earth is dwarfed by water vapor by a factor of 1000 times.. Minor changes in water vapor are a dampener and a negative feed back. Quite the opposite of what the modelers envisioned and why all models fail.

If models didn't take water into consideration, you'd have a point. But they do, so you have no point. Secondly, Unlike water, which cycles through the atmosphere in days to weeks, CO2 take many decades to centuries to cycle through the atmosphere.
 
You know Frank............on 4 different threads in the past 2 days, asked ANY AGW climate crusader to ditch the fancy colorful graphs and vague terms like "warming" and post up the average number............ in degrees................ the earth has warmed since 1998.

And guess what?

We haven't gotten dick!!!!!!!:coffee:



These people are professional frauds:spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::rock:

0.00 Deg C....

Its rather stunning that we can go back to 1996 and have NO DETERMINABLE WARMING.. !8 years 3 months of ZERO anomaly.


imagine that
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
CO2 on earth is dwarfed by water vapor by a factor of 1000 times.. Minor changes in water vapor are a dampener and a negative feed back. Quite the opposite of what the modelers envisioned and why all models fail.


at least a 1000 times


can be up to 4 percent of mass of air
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
Major component? Where the fuck did you go to school?
atmgr.gif


Its a trace gas not a major component..


oldie rocks was trying to explain that co2 on mars is not the same co2 as that of earth

among other fascinating claims about the atmosphere of mars being a vacuum

--LOL
 
Mars Atmosphere Composition Climate Weather

What is Mars' atmosphere made of?

The atmosphere of Mars is about 100 times thinner than Earth's, and it is 95 percent carbon dioxide. Here's a breakdown of its composition:

  • Carbon dioxide: 95.32 percent
  • Nitrogen: 2.7 percent
  • Argon: 1.6 percent
  • Oxygen: 0.13 percent
  • Carbon monoxide: 0.08 percent
  • Also, minor amounts of: water, nitrogen oxide, neon, hydrogen-deuterium-oxygen, krypton and xenon
At less than 1% of the pressure of the Earth's atmosphere, the atmosphere of Mars is hardly a good analog for ours.
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
Major component? Where the fuck did you go to school?
atmgr.gif


Its a trace gas not a major component..
Billy Boob, you are not only stupid, you cannot read. The atmosphere on Mars was the subject.
 
Considering that the CO2 on Mars is the major component of that atmosphere, and, by our standards, would be a vacuum, it is differant. But you silly asses have to have some reply to rational science, so you make these silly flap-yap claims.
Major component? Where the fuck did you go to school?
atmgr.gif


Its a trace gas not a major component..

I guess you missed "on Mars". Take some advice. Read things twice. And if you think you've got a 'Gotcha' read it again, cause the odds are slim.
 
You know Frank............on 4 different threads in the past 2 days, asked ANY AGW climate crusader to ditch the fancy colorful graphs and vague terms like "warming" and post up the average number............ in degrees................ the earth has warmed since 1998.

And guess what?

We haven't gotten dick!!!!!!!:coffee:



These people are professional frauds:spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::spinner::rock:

0.00 Deg C....

Its rather stunning that we can go back to 1996 and have NO DETERMINABLE WARMING.. !8 years 3 months of ZERO anomaly.

Hide

the

Decline
 

Forum List

Back
Top