f'ing LOVE the TEA party right now!!!!

[Full-Auto]

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Well thanks for showing you have no idea.

I bet you dont even know what the cost of complying with regulation is per year.


Get back to us when you learn to work your search engine.

Dumbmuthafacker, burden of proof is on you, your claim is facking fugazi if you can't back it.

Just say, full hold my hand, I dont believe regulation costs anything.

And I will post up.

 

[Stephanie]

no, your facking teabasturds haven't done shat, where are the jobs? They didn't get elected to make the government default and lower its credit rating, go back and look at what they campaigned on, jobs, thats the lie that those fackers sold.

Jobs are being help up for two reasons.

Democrats F'in over investors. and regulation.

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Are you even old enough to GET a job? No one can be this SIMPLE.
or can they? sheeeesh

 

[8537]

fugazi

<8537 goes pining for his old record collection and heads off to search Itunes>

 

[Truthmatters]

U.S. Debt Ceiling: Your Cheat Sheet to the Policy History (NYSEIA, NYSE:IWM, NYSE:SPY, NASDAQ:QQQ, NYSE:MDY, NYSE:TLT, NYSE:TBT, NYSE:XLF, NYSE:UUP, NYSE:UDN) | Wall St. Cheat Sheet



the closest the government ever came to default was a last minute deal in 1979. Though the deal was finalized in time, computer malfunctions led to $122 million in Treasury payments being delayed, technically amounting to temporary default and thus permanently increasing interest rates by 0.6%, resulting in $12 billion in additional annual debt payments, costing the government roughly $384 billion to date. We can only imagine the toll a default, even temporary, could take on today&#8217;s economy.

 

[shintao]

I re-read his post, and I don't see anywhere that he said that. However, simply put, spending > receipts... like BIG TIME.

Spending is way out of control.

"Obama's increased spending is the only reason we need to increase the debt limit."

Oh, but that's not what you said in your initial post. Anyway, we can't lay this solely at the feet of Obama or any president for that matter. With that said, he has definitely exacerbated an already bad situation with his profligate spending. And yes, stimulus was a total failure. Thi is HIS mess... and he is not handling it well at all, to say the least.

Hmm, a con saying giving the rich & corporations money does not stimulate the economy? You might say, this is the righty's Waterloo on Corporate aid and bailouts which they are famous for buttering the hands of corporations. You wanted wars, and now you are paying for them, instead of your children.

 

[P@triot]

no, your facking teabasturds haven't done shat, where are the jobs? They didn't get elected to make the government default and lower its credit rating, go back and look at what they campaigned on, jobs, thats the lie that those fackers sold.

Jobs are being help up for two reasons.

Democrats F'in over investors. and regulation.

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Typical response from the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats who don't understand economics. If the rich are so "greedy" as the idiot liberal likes to accuse them of, then it would go to reason that they want to expand their business to make even more money. And to grow, they would need more people to handle the additional volume of work, hence more jobs would be created. So it is clearly not the "evil rich" people as you state. Only the idiot Dumbocrat contradicts their own statements.

Here are some actual facts for you Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats:

The annual cost of regulation&#8212;$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate&#8212;represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year (tough to hire when American businesses are spending $1.75 trillion on government regulation). Overall, from the beginning of the Obama Administration to mid-fiscal year (FY) 2011, regulators have imposed $38 billion in new costs on the American people, more than any comparable period on record. Consider Washington's red tape to be a hidden tax.

The mountain of regulations didn't begin under the Obama Administration. Under the Administration of George W. Bush (which is more evidence the GOP is just Liberal Lite), for example, $60 billion in additional annual regulatory costs were imposed on Americans. But, the rate at which burdens are growing has accelerated under the Obama Administration:

During its first 26 months&#8212;from taking office to mid-FY 2011&#8212;the Obama Administration has imposed 75 new major regulations with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. During the same period, six major rulemaking proceedings reduced regulatory burdens by an estimated $1.5 billion, still leaving a net increase of more than $38 billion.

The actual cost of the new regulations is almost certainly higher due to under-estimation, agencies' failures to analyze costs, and the fact that "non-major" rules aren't even calculated. Amid the overwhelming weight of the evidence that government regulations are weighing down the American economy, President Obama continues to stiffle the economy with his Marxist policies.

Rather than ignorantly popping off at the mouth regarding subjects you know nothing about, why don't you educate yourself about what is really going on, you ignorant loud-mouthed jack ass.

 

[Full-Auto]

U.S. Debt Ceiling: Your Cheat Sheet to the Policy History (NYSEIA, NYSE:IWM, NYSE:SPY, NASDAQ:QQQ, NYSE:MDY, NYSE:TLT, NYSE:TBT, NYSE:XLF, NYSE:UUP, NYSE:UDN) | Wall St. Cheat Sheet

Government - Historical Debt Outstanding – Annual

Live it, your lack of credibility puts anything you post suspect.

 

[Flaylo]

Jobs are being help up for two reasons.

Democrats F'in over investors. and regulation.

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Are you even old enough to GET a job? No one can be this SIMPLE.
or can they? sheeeesh

Dunb cow, I'm in the military and I can get a job if I got out, the truth is that the rich 'job creators' re stalling job creation to keep down costs so they can pocket it.

 

[8537]

Jobs are being help up for two reasons.

Democrats F'in over investors. and regulation.

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Typical response from the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats who don't understand economics. If the rich are so "greedy" as the idiot liberal likes to accuse them of, then it would go to reason that they want to expand their business to make even more money. And to grow, they would need more people to handle the additional volume of work, hence more jobs would be created. So it is clearly not the "evil rich" people as you state. Only the idiot Dumbocrat contradicts their own statements.

Here are some actual facts for you Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats:

The annual cost of regulation&#8212;$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate&#8212;represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year (tough to hire when American businesses are spending $1.75 trillion on government regulation). Overall, from the beginning of the Obama Administration to mid-fiscal year (FY) 2011, regulators have imposed $38 billion in new costs on the American people, more than any comparable period on record. Consider Washington's red tape to be a hidden tax.

The mountain of regulations didn't begin under the Obama Administration. Under the Administration of George W. Bush (which is more evidence the GOP is just Liberal Lite), for example, $60 billion in additional annual regulatory costs were imposed on Americans. But, the rate at which burdens are growing has accelerated under the Obama Administration:

During its first 26 months&#8212;from taking office to mid-FY 2011&#8212;the Obama Administration has imposed 75 new major regulations with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. During the same period, six major rulemaking proceedings reduced regulatory burdens by an estimated $1.5 billion, still leaving a net increase of more than $38 billion.

The actual cost of the new regulations is almost certainly higher due to under-estimation, agencies' failures to analyze costs, and the fact that "non-major" rules aren't even calculated. Amid the overwhelming weight of the evidence that government regulations are weighing down the American economy, President Obama continues to stiffle the economy with his Marxist policies.

Rather than ignorantly popping off at the mouth regarding subjects you know nothing about, why don't you educate yourself about what is really going on, you ignorant loud-mouthed jack ass.

if you're going to cut and paste word for word from the Big Time Conservative blog, you could at least show enough respect for intellectual property rights to link to it.

 

[P@triot]

I'd love nothing more than an immediate and permanent government "default".

There you have it, folks. Tea Party patriotism on display. What's bad for America is good for the Tea Party.

By the way - who the hell are you Dumbocrats to talk about "patriotism"? You idiots believe the Consitution is "irrelevant" and "outdated" and not a one of you has ever actually read it. What is less "patriotic" than Obamacare - unconstitutionally and Communistically forcing the American people to purchase a product or service against their will? There is nobody less patriot than the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrat, so please spare us all the rhetoric chief.

 

[Flaylo]

Jobs are being help up for two reasons.

Democrats F'in over investors. and regulation.

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Typical response from the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats who don't understand economics. If the rich are so "greedy" as the idiot liberal likes to accuse them of, then it would go to reason that they want to expand their business to make even more money. And to grow, they would need more people to handle the additional volume of work, hence more jobs would be created. So it is clearly not the "evil rich" people as you state. Only the idiot Dumbocrat contradicts their own statements.

Here are some actual facts for you Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats:

The annual cost of regulation—$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate—represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year (tough to hire when American businesses are spending $1.75 trillion on government regulation). Overall, from the beginning of the Obama Administration to mid-fiscal year (FY) 2011, regulators have imposed $38 billion in new costs on the American people, more than any comparable period on record. Consider Washington's red tape to be a hidden tax.

The mountain of regulations didn't begin under the Obama Administration. Under the Administration of George W. Bush (which is more evidence the GOP is just Liberal Lite), for example, $60 billion in additional annual regulatory costs were imposed on Americans. But, the rate at which burdens are growing has accelerated under the Obama Administration:

During its first 26 months—from taking office to mid-FY 2011—the Obama Administration has imposed 75 new major regulations with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. During the same period, six major rulemaking proceedings reduced regulatory burdens by an estimated $1.5 billion, still leaving a net increase of more than $38 billion.

The actual cost of the new regulations is almost certainly higher due to under-estimation, agencies' failures to analyze costs, and the fact that "non-major" rules aren't even calculated. Amid the overwhelming weight of the evidence that government regulations are weighing down the American economy, President Obama continues to stiffle the economy with his Marxist policies.

Rather than ignorantly popping off at the mouth regarding subjects you know nothing about, why don't you educate yourself about what is really going on, you ignorant loud-mouthed jack ass.

I want to see the money not your copy and pasted rightwing talking points.

 

[shintao]

Well thanks for showing you have no idea.

I bet you dont even know what the cost of complying with regulation is per year.


Get back to us when you learn to work your search engine.

Dumbmuthafacker, burden of proof is on you, your claim is facking fugazi if you can't back it.

Just say, full hold my hand, I dont believe regulation costs anything.

And I will post up.

Regulations cost the American taxpayer a ton of money, and tie up private enterprise from doing what they need to do. Consumers have court systems to correct any wrongs by corporations, but we also need government to get out of the way of lawsuits and putting caps on how much you can sue a corporation for. A two way street for Americans who are being hindered in business and consumerism.

I am tired of paying for regulations, inspections, and monitoring corporations with tons of Administrative departments doing what corporations should be doing themselves if they value being in business.

 

[8537]

I'd love nothing more than an immediate and permanent government "default".

There you have it, folks. Tea Party patriotism on display. What's bad for America is good for the Tea Party.

By the way - who the hell are you Dumbocrats to talk about "patriotism"? You idiots believe the Consitution is "irrelevant" and "outdated" and not a one of you has ever actually read it. What is less "patriotic" than Obamacare - unconstitutionally and Communistically forcing the American people to purchase a product or service against their will? There is nobody less patriot than the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrat, so please spare us all the rhetoric chief.

Who knew Rottweilers could be trained like parrots?

 

[Full-Auto]

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Typical response from the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats who don't understand economics. If the rich are so "greedy" as the idiot liberal likes to accuse them of, then it would go to reason that they want to expand their business to make even more money. And to grow, they would need more people to handle the additional volume of work, hence more jobs would be created. So it is clearly not the "evil rich" people as you state. Only the idiot Dumbocrat contradicts their own statements.

Here are some actual facts for you Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats:

The annual cost of regulation—$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate—represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year (tough to hire when American businesses are spending $1.75 trillion on government regulation). Overall, from the beginning of the Obama Administration to mid-fiscal year (FY) 2011, regulators have imposed $38 billion in new costs on the American people, more than any comparable period on record. Consider Washington's red tape to be a hidden tax.

The mountain of regulations didn't begin under the Obama Administration. Under the Administration of George W. Bush (which is more evidence the GOP is just Liberal Lite), for example, $60 billion in additional annual regulatory costs were imposed on Americans. But, the rate at which burdens are growing has accelerated under the Obama Administration:

During its first 26 months—from taking office to mid-FY 2011—the Obama Administration has imposed 75 new major regulations with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. During the same period, six major rulemaking proceedings reduced regulatory burdens by an estimated $1.5 billion, still leaving a net increase of more than $38 billion.

The actual cost of the new regulations is almost certainly higher due to under-estimation, agencies' failures to analyze costs, and the fact that "non-major" rules aren't even calculated. Amid the overwhelming weight of the evidence that government regulations are weighing down the American economy, President Obama continues to stiffle the economy with his Marxist policies.

Rather than ignorantly popping off at the mouth regarding subjects you know nothing about, why don't you educate yourself about what is really going on, you ignorant loud-mouthed jack ass.

I want to see the money not your copy and pasted rightwing talking points.

Just because I like seeing you throw fits.

Red Tape: Rising Cost of Government Regulation | The Heritage Foundation

Now before your nose becomes disjointed try to counter with your own cost analysis.

 

[P@triot]

the tea party is the reason this country is about to default

Good! Somebody has to be the adults in the room and stop the spending. As someone already said in this thread, Obama and the rest of the Dumbocrats are acting like crack whores with their daddy's credit card. Someone has to stop the spending.

The question is, why do you attack the only adults in the room trying to be responsible while supporting an idiot Marxist who has spent us into $14 trillion in debt. We're going to collapse like Greece. How dumb are you to not understand that?!?!?!?

Furthermore, the Tea Party is willing to raise the debt ceiling to avoid default - they are only asking for a Balanced Budget amendment to ensure the Dumbocrats don't spend us into collapse again - so stop spreading lies.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Tea Party racists and fascists and corporatists reflect the worst in America.

The president said flatly this morning a bi-partisan consensus is required to work on the problem, not 1 of Americans telling the other 4 what to do.

You TeaBots will heel, no doubt about it.

 

[Full-Auto]

the tea party racists and fascists and corporatists reflect the worst in america.

The president said flatly this morning a bi-partisan consensus is required to work on the problem, not 1 of americans telling the other 4 what to do.

You teabots will heel, no doubt about it.

lol see post 95

 

[P@triot]

yet so true! Just take a look at the Tea Partiers hoping we default.

Whether they realize it or not, they are hoping that millions more homes get foreclosed, millions more people lose their jobs, every person with any sort of loan is forced to pay more, our government is forced to borrow at much higher rates even if they want to fund a war and our standing as the world's most important economic player gets tossed aside.

Why did Obama tank the deal?

Why?

There was no deal. Not even close, according to Boehner. Here, let's quote him shall we?

"In the end, we couldn't connect. Not because of different personalities, but because of different visions for our country," Boehner wrote in a letter to his fellow Republicans.

The House speaker said that "a deal was never reached, and was never really close."

"For these reasons, I have decided to end discussions with the White House and begin conversations with the leaders of the Senate in an effort to find a path forward,"

Debt talks between Obama, House Speaker Boehner collapse - CNN

Yeah, they weren't even close to a deal because Obama wants to spend this nation into collapse and will accept nothing less. All he has to do is agree to a Balanced Budget amendment and he gets the debt ceiling hike he wants. Why won't he agree to that? Because it limits his spending, and he wants to spend us into collapse. It's just that simple.

 

[Ali777]

Every plan Obama backs the right spits on.

He has backed things they came up with and then they voted against their own bills.

They are insane and nothing good is going to come from their insanity.

Obama added more taxes at the last minute because he did not negotiate in good faith

What, you just noticed that Obama was in favor of tax increases for the wealthiest Americans? Republican refuse to even allow taxes to be on the table. 70% of Americans are in favor of increased taxes on the rich. Good faith requires he represent their interests.

 

[Vanquish]

Jobs are being help up for two reasons.

Democrats F'in over investors. and regulation.

Jobs are being held up because the rich business owners want to keep more money for the selves, not because of over regulation you facktard

Typical response from the Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats who don't understand economics. If the rich are so "greedy" as the idiot liberal likes to accuse them of, then it would go to reason that they want to expand their business to make even more money. And to grow, they would need more people to handle the additional volume of work, hence more jobs would be created. So it is clearly not the "evil rich" people as you state. Only the idiot Dumbocrat contradicts their own statements.

Here are some actual facts for you Marxist/Socialist/Communist Dumbocrats:

The annual cost of regulation—$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate—represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year (tough to hire when American businesses are spending $1.75 trillion on government regulation). Overall, from the beginning of the Obama Administration to mid-fiscal year (FY) 2011, regulators have imposed $38 billion in new costs on the American people, more than any comparable period on record. Consider Washington's red tape to be a hidden tax.

The mountain of regulations didn't begin under the Obama Administration. Under the Administration of George W. Bush (which is more evidence the GOP is just Liberal Lite), for example, $60 billion in additional annual regulatory costs were imposed on Americans. But, the rate at which burdens are growing has accelerated under the Obama Administration:

During its first 26 months—from taking office to mid-FY 2011—the Obama Administration has imposed 75 new major regulations with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. During the same period, six major rulemaking proceedings reduced regulatory burdens by an estimated $1.5 billion, still leaving a net increase of more than $38 billion.

The actual cost of the new regulations is almost certainly higher due to under-estimation, agencies' failures to analyze costs, and the fact that "non-major" rules aren't even calculated. Amid the overwhelming weight of the evidence that government regulations are weighing down the American economy, President Obama continues to stiffle the economy with his Marxist policies.

Rather than ignorantly popping off at the mouth regarding subjects you know nothing about, why don't you educate yourself about what is really going on, you ignorant loud-mouthed jack ass.

I'm not going to insult you, nor am I going to tell you that you're 100% wrong, but...

The comment made earlier that rich folk are holding onto their money isn't wrong. Some conservatives are making such a big deal out of the "uncertainty of the markets"

Translation...they dont want to risk their money. And who can blame them.

You keep wanting to hang ALL the blame on Obama. Sure, he deserves some of it, but not as much as you want to say. Trickle-down economics depends on the magnanimity/gambling nature of business leaders. And they aren't always magnanimous or ready to gamble.