Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so you are so uninformed you think cutting the money in our economy would lead to recovery?
The country will get the president they deserve. This time around i don't want to hear a peep from the Obama supporters when he strips out the remaining civil liberties we once enjoyed in this country and turns that 15 trillion dollar debt into 20-25 trillion by 2016. If the dollar even makes it that far.
Remember after Obama won the election and there was a run on ammunition? And people paid through the nose for it because "Obama was gonna take their guns" away?
And how long did that last? 2 years, before you clowns figured out he wasn't gonna take your guns and ammo away and prices finally dropped.
And if you don't like Obama's debt, you should have paid attention when George Bush rang up his tax cuts and wars on the national credit card. 1/5th of "Obama's" deficits are direct results of Bush policies.
Now don't you feel silly being WRONG about so many things?
Most people dont realise Las Vegas has a large mormon population.
many people realize your house has a large moron population.
so you are so uninformed you think cutting the money in our economy would lead to recovery?
It's not that easy to defeat a sitting president running for reelection. There have been 44 presidents of the U.S. Of those, the following who were elected for a first term lost their bid for a second term:
John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Martin Van Buren
Chester A. Arthur
Grover Cleveland
William H. Taft
Herbert Hoover
Jimmy Carter
George H.W. Bush
Nine out of 44 is not very good odds. As long as the economy continues to improve, Obama is almost sure to win reelection, no matter who the Republicans nominate.
What should be of more concern is the prospect of what low GOP voter turnout will do to the Congressional elections. There may be a real danger of the party losing the House.
Government spending is spending.
Its part of the economy no matter how many convulsions you fools go through to claim it is not.
Now Why wont any of you give us an historical example of what you claim will work?
The country will get the president they deserve. This time around i don't want to hear a peep from the Obama supporters when he strips out the remaining civil liberties we once enjoyed in this country and turns that 15 trillion dollar debt into 20-25 trillion by 2016. If the dollar even makes it that far.
The country will get the president they deserve. This time around i don't want to hear a peep from the Obama supporters when he strips out the remaining civil liberties we once enjoyed in this country and turns that 15 trillion dollar debt into 20-25 trillion by 2016. If the dollar even makes it that far.
Remember after Obama won the election and there was a run on ammunition? And people paid through the nose for it because "Obama was gonna take their guns" away?
And how long did that last? 2 years, before you clowns figured out he wasn't gonna take your guns and ammo away and prices finally dropped.
And if you don't like Obama's debt, you should have paid attention when George Bush rang up his tax cuts and wars on the national credit card. 1/5th of "Obama's" deficits are direct results of Bush policies.
Now don't you feel silly being WRONG about so many things?
The country will get the president they deserve. This time around i don't want to hear a peep from the Obama supporters when he strips out the remaining civil liberties we once enjoyed in this country and turns that 15 trillion dollar debt into 20-25 trillion by 2016. If the dollar even makes it that far.
Remember after Obama won the election and there was a run on ammunition? And people paid through the nose for it because "Obama was gonna take their guns" away?
And how long did that last? 2 years, before you clowns figured out he wasn't gonna take your guns and ammo away and prices finally dropped.
And if you don't like Obama's debt, you should have paid attention when George Bush rang up his tax cuts and wars on the national credit card. 1/5th of "Obama's" deficits are direct results of Bush policies.
Now don't you feel silly being WRONG about so many things?
The above chart is structured like Pelosi's chart. The major difference is that we’ve highlighted Congress since 1981, instead of the presidency. Of those sixteen Congresses, Democrats controlled the House nine times while Republicans controlled it seven times. While in power, the Democrats dramatically outspent the Republicans. The 471% increase in the debt during 18 years of Democratic control is staggeringly more than the 105% increase during 14 years of Republican control.
The stunning rise in the national debt since 2000 occurred under both Republican and Democratic leadership in the House and the presidency (my note: when the hell are people going to wake up and realize that BOTH parties are at fault, BOTH are to blame?). Neither party can claim a spotless record with regard to deficit spending and debt creation. Still, the degree to which the Democrats in Congress under President Obama’s leadership have engaged in both of these practices is frightening. The federal government will default on its debts if the public does not force those in power to cut back spending.
It's not that easy to defeat a sitting president running for reelection. There have been 44 presidents of the U.S. Of those, the following who were elected for a first term lost their bid for a second term:
John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Martin Van Buren
Chester A. Arthur
Grover Cleveland
William H. Taft
Herbert Hoover
Jimmy Carter
George H.W. Bush
Nine out of 44 is not very good odds. As long as the economy continues to improve, Obama is almost sure to win reelection, no matter who the Republicans nominate.
What should be of more concern is the prospect of what low GOP voter turnout will do to the Congressional elections. There may be a real danger of the party losing the House.
And this is supposedly good news for bigots like the OP