why would she need to be there?She's the leader of the state of Alaska, and is responsible for what goes on in it. A volcano (natural event, not caused by her or Bush Jr.), which is close to one of the larger population areas, is getting ready to erupt.
As governor of the state, don't you think that she should be there to help with the evacuation and (possible) clean up?
Other governors to to wherever their state has problems when natural disasters occur, why not her?
Oh wait......I forgot......she's a brilliant leader and can do all of that stuff through the tv on a talk show.
So Sarah Palin should do something to stop the volcano from erupting?
ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD that's precious...
Yeah... you're all over it... (Sadly "it" is not "reality")
You have to be one of the dumbest motherfuckers I've seen in a while. No, I didn't say stop the thing, I said that she should be there to assist with planning evacuation routes, as well as planning how to clean it up, as that causes a MESS. I was living in Missoula Mt. when St. Helens went off, and we ended up with around 6 inches of ash in the valley I lived. Took around 3 weeks to get everything back to normal.
Are your boys as stupid as you?
if thats the case, why wasnt Blanco in New Orleans