Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trailer is out.. It looks like more of the same.. A HORSESHIT joke in regard to the true lifestyle. Dakota Johnson once again tops from the bottom throughout the entire trailer which tells me this movie is no different from the 1st one. The only saving grace may be that Kim Bassinger makes a cameo appearance. She is the definition of the lifestyle in her infamous role with Mickey Rourke in 9 and 1/2 wks.
Trailer is out.. It looks like more of the same.. A HORSESHIT joke in regard to the true lifestyle. Dakota Johnson once again tops from the bottom throughout the entire trailer which tells me this movie is no different from the 1st one. The only saving grace may be that Kim Bassinger makes a cameo appearance. She is the definition of the lifestyle in her infamous role with Mickey Rourke in 9 and 1/2 wks.
50 Shades is horribly written, breaks so many rules of the lifestyle, and is basically a 12 year old girl's fantasy with rape thrown in for good measure. I read the first book (well most of it). I'll not waste any more time on that dreck.
I read I think 3 chapters and it reads like the author was all nipply when she wrote it. I stopped when he's at her store buying duct tape and electrical fasteners -- not cotton rope, I thought he was in line to be Dexter
Trailer is out.. It looks like more of the same.. A HORSESHIT joke in regard to the true lifestyle. Dakota Johnson once again tops from the bottom throughout the entire trailer which tells me this movie is no different from the 1st one. The only saving grace may be that Kim Bassinger makes a cameo appearance. She is the definition of the lifestyle in her infamous role with Mickey Rourke in 9 and 1/2 wks.
50 Shades is horribly written, breaks so many rules of the lifestyle, and is basically a 12 year old girl's fantasy with rape thrown in for good measure. I read the first book (well most of it). I'll not waste any more time on that dreck.
In psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship.Actually, Frank has it right.. He's the male Dominant intent on understanding his role in the D/s relationship thus he reads, broadens his understanding as any good Dominant would when relating to a submissive.
In psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship.Actually, Frank has it right.. He's the male Dominant intent on understanding his role in the D/s relationship thus he reads, broadens his understanding as any good Dominant would when relating to a submissive.
And being bisexual is different than being homosexual. LOLIn psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship.Actually, Frank has it right.. He's the male Dominant intent on understanding his role in the D/s relationship thus he reads, broadens his understanding as any good Dominant would when relating to a submissive.
S&M is very different from D/s.
And being bisexual is different than being homosexual. LOLIn psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship.Actually, Frank has it right.. He's the male Dominant intent on understanding his role in the D/s relationship thus he reads, broadens his understanding as any good Dominant would when relating to a submissive.
S&M is very different from D/s.
It's a matter of degree. For the record, I don't give a shit what two or more consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes, but don't tell me homosexuality is "normal" or that D/S isn't Sado-masochism.
Yes and yes. So why are you so defensive here? "Very often". "Yes, the lines can blur". No shit. LOLDon't tell you the truth? Don't tell you facts?
Very often, D/s involves no pain. Which is the definition of Sadomasochism. S&M is all about pain. D/s is about control. Yes, the lines can blur. But they are certainly not the same thing.
Yes and yes. So why are you so defensive here? "Very often". "Yes, the lines can blur". No shit. LOLDon't tell you the truth? Don't tell you facts?
Very often, D/s involves no pain. Which is the definition of Sadomasochism. S&M is all about pain. D/s is about control. Yes, the lines can blur. But they are certainly not the same thing.
Dominant/Submissive sex games are a subcategory of Sado-Masochism. Let's not forget that I said "In psychology" not the terms used by your little sex game world.
Dominant or Submissive? Paradox of Power in Sexual Relations
BDSM, Personality and Mental Health
A recent study on the psychological profile of BDSM (bondage-discipline, dominance-submission, sadism-masochism) practitioners has attracted a great deal of media attention, with headlines proclaiming that “S&M practitioners are healthier and less neurotic than those with a tamer sex life.” Although BDSM has often in the past been thought to be associated with psychopathology, the authors of the study argued that practitioners are generally psychologically healthy, if not more so in some respects, compared to the general population. However, it should be noted that most of the apparent psychological benefits of being a practitioner applied to those in the dominant rather than the submissive role. Additionally, the study findings need to be treated with some caution because it is not clear that the comparison group is a good representation of the general population.
And being bisexual is different than being homosexual. LOLIn psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship.Actually, Frank has it right.. He's the male Dominant intent on understanding his role in the D/s relationship thus he reads, broadens his understanding as any good Dominant would when relating to a submissive.
S&M is very different from D/s.
It's a matter of degree. For the record, I don't give a shit what two or more consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes, but don't tell me homosexuality is "normal" or that D/S isn't Sado-masochism.
Incorrect. I said "In psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship" whereupon you and WinterBorn got your leather panties in a bunch and your ball gags all askew.You're the one who came in demanding you knew all about it..
In psychology, this is known as a Sado-Masochist relationship.Actually, Frank has it right.. He's the male Dominant intent on understanding his role in the D/s relationship thus he reads, broadens his understanding as any good Dominant would when relating to a submissive.
It's been removed from the DSM. Shrinks are more concerned if a person is having a problem with their orientation, not what their orientation is. However, when discussing statistics, obviously, at about 2%, homosexuality isn't in the mainstream.What do psychologists say about whether homosexuality is "normal"?
It's been removed from the DSM. Shrinks are more concerned if a person is having a problem with their orientation, not what their orientation is. However, when discussing statistics, obviously, at about 2%, homosexuality isn't in the mainstream.What do psychologists say about whether homosexuality is "normal"?
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr077.pdf
Based on the 2013 NHIS data, 96.6% of adults identified as straight, 1.6% identified as gay or lesbian, and 0.7% identified as bisexual. The remaining 1.1% of adults identified as ‘‘something else,’’ stated ‘‘I don’t know the answer,’’ or refused to provide an answer. Significant differences were found in health-related behaviors, health status, health care service utilization, and health care access among U.S. adults aged 18–64 who identified as straight, gay or lesbian, or bisexual
Your desire to ignore statistics is interesting. If 98% of a group does one thing and 2% does the opposite, for that group, what is their "normal" behavior?I didn't ask whether it was a majority of the population or only a small part. That is irrelevant.
I simply asked what psychologists say about whether homosexuality is "normal". According to psychologists, within the bounds of sexual behavior, homosexuality is "normal".
