Federal Reserve Won't Say Who They Gave $2 Trillion To?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by sealybobo, May 29, 2009.

  1. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    And you guys are crying about $750 billion?

    Notice this was done last year on Bush's watch?

    This probably happens all the time and we just never hear about it. It is time to take back the Federal Reserve from the bankers that own it.

    Why we are trusting greedy bankers instead of our own government is beyond me.

    Stop thinking your government is the enemy. They only are if they are siding with these criminals!!!

    http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/106443/why_won't_the_federal_reserve_say_who_they_gave_$2_trillion_to/
     
  2. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    The idea that a central bank that has screwed up as badly as the Fed has under both Greenspan and Bernanke is so much better off independent than with the public having some control is ridiculous and fundamentally anti-democratic. Central bank independence has just led to a huge financial bubble and economic collapse, while Bernanke and Greenspan both acted as if they were virtual dictators.
     
  3. pete
    Offline

    pete The food stamp president

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,581
    Thanks Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +232
    Bushes watch or not it was still GOVERNMENT they are all to blame not just Bush
     
  4. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    The masters control government and the banks.

    They needed some additional dough.

    They got it from administrations representing BOTH parties.

    Que surprise, eh?
     
  5. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    I'm not even blaming government, other than the fact that they have the power to take back the Federal Reserve from private bankers.

    And that's going to take more of you to join people like Bernie Sanders or Ron Paul.

    Two opposite sides of the political spectrum, both telling you that these private bankers have too much power.

    Come on!! We need the government to do this. And they won't if we don't make them. Dems or GOP. Neither will take this on until they know we support them.

    Ron Paul has a petition.

    H.R. 1207:
    111th CongressThis is a bill in the U.S. Congress originating in the House of Representatives ("H.R."). A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate and then be signed by the President before it becomes law.

    Bill numbers restart from 1 every two years. Each two-year cycle is called a session of Congress. This bill was created in the 111th Congress, in 2009-2010.

    The titles of bills are written by the bill's sponsor and are a part of the legislation itself. GovTrack does not editorialize bill summaries.


    2009-2010 Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009

    H.R. 1207: Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009 (GovTrack.us)

    And watch, the GOP will be the ones to defend the Federal Reserve. That's because the richest bankers in the world are Republicans!!!

    But yes, they also have the dems under their control too. But I have heard many dems at least be open to doing this.

    Remember what the GOP did to Ron Paul during the elections when he brought this up? They blacklisted him from any future debates, even though he won the first few he was in. And do you remember how Glen Beck treated him? Glen beck, a supposed "libertarian"? He rolled his eyes at Ron Paul.
     
  6. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    I waited all this time and not one complaint from any teabaggers or people who are sooo worried about Obama's Trillion dollar 10 year plan.

    No rallys being planned?

    No outrage?

    No replies?

    I didn't think so.

    Like I said Ed, the difference between the parties is the voters. The reason the Democrats are better is because WE as people are better people.

    The right wingers won't complain about the bankers. The bankers can have as much as they want. Don't worry about inflation or the debt until Obama wants to spend some money.
     
  7. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    More BOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!! :rolleyes:
     
  8. txlonghorn
    Offline

    txlonghorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,042
    Thanks Received:
    399
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +399
    Let's keep in mind that the house that passed all these monies around had their grimey little paws out...yes...Democrats too.

    You're better people??? STFU.
     
  9. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    OMG, you didn't even read what was posted. No wonder the bankers took over. It was easy because people are clueless. Do you understand the 2 trillion did not go thru government? They gave the 2 trillion FIRST and then lied to us and said they needed $750 billion more.

    If you knew how much a trillion was you'd be angry. Or, if you weren't controlled by the righties and media who tell you when to get mad, you'd realize the $750 billion was similar to how a magician distracts you with one hand and does the trick with the other.

    Now if you are or were angry about the $750 billion or the $30 billion to the auto companies, consider that 1 trillion is 1000 billions. Is that correct? Did I hear that right? So the Federal Reserve gave 2000 billion dollars to the banks and AIG before ever coming to us for the $750.

    And they won't even tell our politicans who got the money.

    And here is the problem with Americans. You will vote for the GOP who protect these bankers.

    And you'll say the Dems protect them too, but right now Dems and Ron Paul (long republican) are trying to take them on but you are busy teabagging Obama.

    If you joined us in telling them to take back the country from the bankers, we would win. But instead you are crying about socialism and crying for free market capitalism when that means you defend the bankers to have free reign over us. Don't regulate them. The are PRIVATE bankers and you are crying to privatize everything.

    Yes America should be pro business, but being pro corporations being more powerful than our government and owning the process is what you defend. Learn the difference.

    It is a joke to say "dems too". Of course Dems too. But do you really understand the game and what's going on in order to change it? No you do not.
     
  10. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,511
    Thanks Received:
    8,156
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,135
    Yet it's Obama who isnt telling where the money went...
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

filty millioniares