FEC: Trump/ NRA Illegal Collusion

Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.
 
Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.

the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.
 
the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.

That seems like a good idea. :)
 
looks like the roooskie NRA infiltrating honey pot spy is gonna cooperate with the feds because she doesn't wanna go back to russia...hmmmm, wonder why?

& why did john bolton go to russia in 2013 to speak on behalf of russians having the right to own guns when that was never going to be allowed to happen ? & now, that walrus face is trump's national security advisor now...

damn, trumpco is so freakin' incestuous.
 
Last edited:
Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.

the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.


The incoming house can pass whatever they want- but they will need Republican support to make anything law.

If something comes over with no GOP support, Sen. McConnell will just put it into the circular file and that will be that. Little point in having a vote over something with no chance.
 
Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.

So only Republicans voted for Citizens United? :rolleyes:

Oh shit! McTurtle is behind it. Turtles are swamp creatures, after all.

Too much bribery/lobbying going on the government.

Believe it or not, Trump has put the kaibosh down on some lobbying.

He probably would sign an overturn of Citizens United.
 
Last edited:
the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.

That seems like a good idea. :)

sure does- & with a (D) controlled house, it will pass - but will the (R) controlled senate vote yes? i doubt it.
 
Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.

the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.


The incoming house can pass whatever they want- but they will need Republican support to make anything law.

If something comes over with no GOP support, Sen. McConnell will just put it into the circular file and that will be that. Little point in having a vote over something with no chance.

i just said that & it probably won't pass. however the (R) controlled senate has only 2 years to shelve progress. the midterms was mostly rep seats up for grabs & (D) senators had to spend most of their time defending their seats. 2020 will be a huge shakeup for the senate.
 
Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.

So only Republicans voted for Citizens United? :rolleyes:

Oh shit! McTurtle is behind it. Turtles are swamp creatures, after all.

citizen's united went all the way to the SC & justice roberts was the deciding 'vote' to allow it to go into law.
 
the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.

That seems like a good idea. :)

sure does- & with a (D) controlled house, it will pass - but will the (R) controlled senate vote yes? i doubt it.

Many of the "Rs" of today are different than the establishment "Rs" of yesteryear.

I don't see why it wouldn't pass as long as there's not a bunch of bullshit attached. (Like they always do, though).
 
Citizens United opened the flood gates of unlimited corporate cash on our elections. It is all part of the Repub war on ethical elections. Corporate expenditures in election are supposed to be independent of the candidate, but for those like Trump, it is just one more law to be violated.

the incoming house already has a bill ready to go that stipulates big time donations have a disclosure as to where they are coming from - either the names of the individual donors themselves, or that PACs disclose where they get their donations that are to be passed onto campaigns.


The incoming house can pass whatever they want- but they will need Republican support to make anything law.

If something comes over with no GOP support, Sen. McConnell will just put it into the circular file and that will be that. Little point in having a vote over something with no chance.

i just said that & it probably won't pass. however the (R) controlled senate has only 2 years to shelve progress. the midterms was mostly rep seats up for grabs & (D) senators had to spend most of their time defending their seats. 2020 will be a huge shakeup for the senate.


Since when is it "progress" to discourage interested citizens from getting involved into the political process?

Intimidation by progressives of prospective donors who want to contribute to for forward thinking policies- that downright stalinistic.
 
looks like the roooskie NRA infiltrating honey pot spy is gonna cooperate with the feds because she doesn't wanna go back to russia...hmmmm, wonder why?

& why did john bolton go to russia in 2013 to speak on behalf of russians having the right to own guns when that was never going to be allowed to happen ? & now, that walrus face is trump's national security advisor now...

damn, trumpco is so freakin' incestuous.

If you will admit Obama should not have gone to England to campaign against Brexit, I will admit Bolton should not have gone to Russia to promote gun ownership.
 

Forum List

Back
Top