Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It also mentions in vivo effects. Did you somehow miss those parts?It's easy for you to find links to articles you will never read and which you don't understand.
Not quite as easy for you to read and understand them.
The article mentions in vitro effects. Get what else is effective against viruses in vitro? Bleach. So that doesn't tell us anything about its effectiveness, in vivo.
Ths clinical trials held later showed absolutely no effectiveness against the covid virus whatsoever.
A quack French doctor lied about ivermectin. Giuliani picked up on this lie and fed it to the orange slob. Then the orange slob regurgitated it.
And that's it. That's how the myth was born.
Yes, the poor souls who had conditions that actually required it, thanks to the people buying it up for covid.Tens of thousands of people probably died because they were denied ivermectin.
Of ivermectin, on covid? No. I understand that you meant "on viruses".It also mentions in vivo effects.
I was responding to ReinyDays comment:Of ivermectin, on covid? No. I understand that you meant "on viruses".
Can you explain (or post a link) how disrupting the communication systems in multicellular life is effective against simple viruses ... or is this just magically effective against the Covid virus, and none other ...
If Ivermectin is effective against viruses, why haven't we been using it for viral infections ... do you honestly think Big Pharm said they have enough profits? ...
Right, I get it. That's why I said that I understood you meant "antiviral" in general.I was responding to ReinyDays comment:
And yet you said this:Right, I get it. That's why I said that I understood you meant "antiviral" in general.
The article mentions in vitro effects. Get what else is effective against viruses in vitro? Bleach. So that doesn't tell us anything about its effectiveness, in vivo.
Re: the covid-19 virus, because that is true. Agreed?And yet you said this:
Cattle de-wormer is good for livestock. The ivermectin pill for humans is effective. There is a difference but lib media latched on to the term de-wormer as derogatory. Three people I knew were prescribed it for covid and were over it three days later.
Maybe you should list the dates these studies were done.Sorry, there have been enough studies refuting its effect on treating COVID-19. Those studies show it isn't effective.
They took down the info that was deemed as mocking the doctors and inhibiting their practice.
But feel free to deworm yourself. No one is stopping you.
Then show proof there wasn't any shortages or your going to have to go into the phone booth.No, shortages because the orange pile of shit told lies about it, and his supporters believed those lies.
I think you meant, show proof there were shortages.Then show proof there wasn't any shortages or your going to have to go into the phone booth.
View attachment 921547
Your claim, not mine.I think you meant, show proof there were shortages.
Try harder.....Mostly that affected the horses. Of course, they got shorted before the humans did.
No chance the treatment worked successfully in those third world countries who weren't on the WEF supremacy list for quick and needed access to the vax?But that doesn't excuse it as an ethical concern a priori, even if only considering humans who need it..
That's right. No chance. Clinical trials were held. No evidence of effectiveness.Your claim, not mine.
Try harder.....
No chance the treatment worked successfully in those third world countries who weren't on the WEF supremacy list for quick and needed access to the vax?
When was this?That's right. No chance. Clinical trials were held. No evidence of effectiveness.
Educate yourself, useful idiot:Go enjoy your livestock suppositories.
As it turns out, in the past. I don't really care if you believe me or not.When was this?
