Amanda
Calm as a Hindu cow
- Nov 28, 2008
- 4,426
- 1,011
- 48
I love this topic.
I mean sure, you can bite the bullet and go along with it and be a considered a sick fuck by just about everyone, or you can man up and admit your hypocrisy.
The Left has been trying to be smug and claim some kind of moral superiority on the topic of gay marriage for so long, but this really presents an interesting conundrum.
So what's it going to be? Incest is a-ok or re-think that consenting adult thing? You can't be in favor of gay marriage and not be in favor of incestuous marriage without being a hypocrite.
This topic fucking rules.
Really, there is no logical or scientific connection between the two, it's twisting logic and reason in a perverted direction in an attempt to make something which harms no one sound bad. We can use the same logic twisting:
Do you support genocide?
If you don't then you don't support christianity. But if you do support christianity then you are vile or a hypocrite.
Who needs a scientific anything? The argument goes: If two people are consenting adults they should be allowed to do what they please, including getting married.
Ok, I believe that. I think that gays should have the right to a civil union. I think the term marriage should be strictly a religious term and everyone should be allowed to have a civil union. I think polygamous civil unions should be allowed. And I think consenting relatives (i.e. incest) should be allowed. Maybe I'm a sick fuck but I'm no hypocrite.