Falsification Of Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Withing The Frame Of Physics

Discussion in 'Environment' started by daveman, Oct 14, 2010.

  1. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,299
    Thanks Received:
    5,692
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,758
    Falsi fication Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Eff ects Within The Frame Of Physics

    Abstract

    The atmospheric greenhouse e ect, an idea that many authors trace back to the
    traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which
    is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a ctitious mechanism, in
    which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is
    radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. Ac-
    cording to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist.
    Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary
    literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a rm sci-
    enti c foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying
    physical principles are clari ed. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws
    between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the ctitious atmospheric green-
    house e ects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature
    of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned di erence of 33 C is a meaningless number
    calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the
    assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction
    must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsi ed.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,170
    Thanks Received:
    14,903
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,908
    Oh, so that's why the Warmers treat the Laboratory like Dracula greeting the new Dawn!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,170
    Thanks Received:
    14,903
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,908
    Thermometer located : : : Temperature
    inside the car, in direct Sun 71 C
    inside the car, in the shade 39 C
    next to the car, in direct Sun, above the ground 31 C
    next to the car, in the shade, above the ground 29 C
    in the living room 25 C

    Beat Global Warming, open your car window!
     
  4. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,466
    Thanks Received:
    5,411
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,307
  5. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,948
    Thanks Received:
    7,964
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,686



    Non scientific I'm afraid. Any thesis that begins with the assumption that man is the cause loses any scientific credibility. Confirmation Bias is a given with people who write such drivel.
     
  6. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,170
    Thanks Received:
    14,903
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,908
    So if there's a change in the jet stream, say if it slows down a little, that might warm the temperature up too, right?
     
  7. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,663
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,149
    It maybe a sign of a warmer planet with less temperature difference horizontally from north to south. So lets say if the arctic and sub-arctic(Between 40-50 north) area's keep warming at a much faster rate then the tropics then earth's temperature difference with time should decrease, which could mean a weaker jet streams. You see this during the summer when the temperature of Alaska is only slightly lower then Oregon and you get a much further northward jet stream into Canada with weak storms, but during winter when the temperature difference is great then you get jet streams of 200 mph within there cores at 200-300 millibars or 30-45,000 thousand feet. With huge troughs/long waves spitting out many short waves or low pressure area's.

    That is why it rains a lot more during winter on the west coast with much stronger storms, but drier during the summer. That and a much stronger ridging over the four corner area...
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2010
  8. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,170
    Thanks Received:
    14,903
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,908
    So, the jet stream slowed because of AGW...hmmmkay.
     
  9. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,663
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,149


    If we're having a planet with less temperature difference between the tropics and arctic...You would think so....But on the other hand a warmer planet would allow for the Atmosphere to hold more moisture and a warmer ocean would help explosive low pressure development. So maybe that could balance it out some...

    Global warming or no global warming...Even if it is just natural cycle that is going on.
     
  10. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,170
    Thanks Received:
    14,903
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +36,908
    I see. Global warming...it's not really global, it's not really warming, but it's real
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page