50 potential jurors in Trump porn case already dismissed saying they COULD NOT be impartial

Oh cool another word you can misuse.

Poor pathetic manboob.

Wrong. What I know is that it would take a good judge of high moral character and integrity to have done the right thing and dismiss this bullshit.

I know we didn’t get a genuine judge. I suspect that in the deep blue cesspool of Manahattan, justice is unlikely to prevail at the trial level. You root for injustice though. This is why you’re a scumbag.


Wrong again, chimp. I’m not scared at all. I’m disgusted by injustice and by dregs like you who actively root for injustice.


Funny line coming from a cultist like you, vermin

Not at all. I’ve even lived through shit like your hero Obumbler and the present pedo in Chief.

You’re in full projection mode, manboob. All I want is for our elected officials to actually seek to comply with the Constitution. That’s what terrifies you scumbags.
BackAgain just threw another tantrum.
 
a98111de57c8a4e473f27d5fd8872f7f_768x0.jpg
 
Yeah, you are a two-tier double justice price. Take a hike if you can't honorwhat you believe. And I don't wanty whataboutism from your ilk.
Triggered? LMAO. You can't find it so you want to throw a tantrum. I try to follow the innocent until proven guilty maxim. I know, you've been indoctrinated that what ever the democrat msm feeds you is gospel but its not.
 
The media relentless front page smear jobs did their work. The majority of listless Americans bought Orange Man Bad The entity that should have been gagged is MSM and not Trumps observations on the witch hunters
 
Triggered? LMAO. You can't find it so you want to throw a tantrum. I try to follow the innocent until proven guilty maxim. I know, you've been indoctrinated that what ever the democrat msm feeds you is gospel but its not.
Silly goober. The tantrums are from the right. He was indicted. He in trial now. Your tantrums are just starting.
 
I would have said I couldn't be impartial.

I could be impartial, of course.

You just don't want to give the defense any reason to ask for a mistrial based on jury bias. It doesn't matter if the things you said are an accurate statement of reality. If you've ever publicly said even the slightest bad thing about the defendent, you have to declare yourself as "not impartial".
 
I would have said I couldn't be impartial.

I could be impartial, of course.

You just don't want to give the defense any reason to ask for a mistrial based on jury bias. It doesn't matter if the things you said are an accurate statement of reality. If you've ever publicly said even the slightest bad thing about the defendent, you have to declare yourself as "not impartial".
Prosecution, defense, and judge go a jury seated.

Opening statements tomorrow!
 
This trial will be a sham. Trump will not be treated fairly, nor will he be treated impartially.
They'll go through the motions, likely weeks will go by, but in the end the verdict will be guilty.
If the Judicial branch allows the trial to go on about putting a man who was elected by the American people in the WH, just maybe it is a Judicial branch versus an Executive branch constitutional breach. Just reasoning it out as best that I can. I hope the powers that be acknowledge the Constitution in this wrongful case. I should hope the Democrats hold Constitutional issues dear enough so no betrayal of the U.S. Constitution could ever exist.
 
If the Judicial branch allows the trial to go on about putting a man who was elected by the American people in the WH, just maybe it is a Judicial branch versus an Executive branch constitutional breach. Just reasoning it out as best that I can. I hope the powers that be acknowledge the Constitution in this wrongful case. I should hope the Democrats hold Constitutional issues dear enough so no betrayal of the U.S. Constitution could ever exist.
The American people said no to Trump by 2 million votes in 2016 and by 7 million votes in 2020.

The president is not a King. He's subject to the same laws as the rest of us.
 

Forum List

Back
Top