Facebook bans hateful bitch


About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.

 
Rather than banning them, all should just be lumped together as one renamed "Hateful Bitch" or "Fucking Jerk." Incredible Asshole says all should enjoy dashing those so-and-so's babies' heads against rocks
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.

This wretch has no political opinions. She makes a living by causing outrage. Now she has to find another way.
If you want to use a platform then you should read the rules and abide by them. It isnt complicated.
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.

Wrong.

The doctrine of free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed – not between or among private persons or entities, such as social media platforms.

As a private entity Twitter is at liberty to edit its content as it sees fit, no ‘free speech’ is being ‘violated.’
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.

Wrong.

The doctrine of free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed – not between or among private persons or entities, such as social media platforms.

As a private entity Twitter is at liberty to edit its content as it sees fit, no ‘free speech’ is being ‘violated.’


I didn't say the broad had a legal right to speak on Twitter or they couldn't ban her if they want. Just that it violates the spirit of the free exchange in the marketplace of ideas.
 
I agree with the market place of ideas, but that doesn't mean her packages of shit should be allowed to take up space on the shelves.
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.

Wrong.

The doctrine of free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed – not between or among private persons or entities, such as social media platforms.

As a private entity Twitter is at liberty to edit its content as it sees fit, no ‘free speech’ is being ‘violated.’


I didn't say the broad had a legal right to speak on Twitter or they couldn't ban her if they want. Just that it violates the spirit of the free exchange in the marketplace of ideas.
She has no ideas.She has found that she gets a reaction from spreading hate and that is all she has.
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.

This wretch has no political opinions. She makes a living by causing outrage. Now she has to find another way.
If you want to use a platform then you should read the rules and abide by them. It isnt complicated.
I read an article on this banning....but never saw the actual hateful content she was posting.
I guess you communists feel it's enough to just label someone as hateful and that should suffice.
 
I agree with the market place of ideas, but that doesn't mean her packages of shit should be allowed to take up space on the shelves.
Neither does USMB have to allow your packages of shit to be on the shelf either.
Yet libstains here bitch constantly about the "right wing" site and its "right wing" moderators every time their moronic threads end up in the Rubber Room.
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.


I doubt that this guy is going to give a "major speech" about anything. It will probably just be about how he hates supporters of the Democratic Party. Been there. Done that. He has never made a "major speech" about anything. He is "campaigning" on the taxpayers dime any way. We are paying for his campaign trips. How many millions has he cost us already?

Don't expect the private sector to give you a soap box. Find your own venue. You can broadcast on Fox, can't you? The only thing that I find right-wingers say is complaints about other Americans, "blacks this," "women that", "LGBTs this," "Muslims that," Jews this," "Latinos that." It's a load of garbage, Are any of you capable of communicating any ideas for the nation that don't have anything to do with complaining about your fellow Americans or bossing us around? We are 320 million plus here.

BTW: I'm cruising Jersey right now. I've got CHRUSCIKI! Just like at Nana's all those years ago.
 

About time. Hopkins makes a living from outraging common decency. She has no place in a civilised society.


Libs in the modern age are hell for trying to silence those whom they disagree with. So much for "free speech" I guess.

As we speak, Liberals are doing their damnedest here in America to silence the President from giving a major speech in the tremendous city of Tulsa this evening. The idea of going to the courts to prevent an opponent from campaigning, just because their own candidate is hiding under his bed in the basement of his mansion is just wrong.

Back in the day, people were a lot more civil. The leaders of the Nazi Party attended an African American muslim meeting in Washington, and listened politely. The muslims weren't upset that they were listening either, people respected each other's right to speak across the board, even socialists.

Although in this case, Fuhrer Rockwell wasn't happen to get his picture taken, and threatened to have the Jewish photographer made into a bar of soap after he got into power. Its still remained civil.


I doubt that this guy is going to give a "major speech" about anything. It will probably just be about how he hates supporters of the Democratic Party. Been there. Done that. He has never made a "major speech" about anything. He is "campaigning" on the taxpayers dime any way. We are paying for his campaign trips. How many millions has he cost us already?

Don't expect the private sector to give you a soap box. Find your own venue. You can broadcast on Fox, can't you? The only thing that I find right-wingers say is complaints about other Americans, "blacks this," "women that", "LGBTs this," "Muslims that," Jews this," "Latinos that." It's a load of garbage, Are any of you capable of communicating any ideas for the nation that don't have anything to do with complaining about your fellow Americans or bossing us around? We are 320 million plus here.

BTW: I'm cruising Jersey right now. I've got CHRUSCIKI! Just like at Nana's all those years ago.


The complaints about taxpayer paid security for the President never came up when the President was named B. Hussein O.

The Secret Service is charged with protecting Presidents and their families, where they go out to Hawaii or Martha's Vineyard, or if they go to a Trump property.
 
It would be helpful if Tommy gave us a few quotes of "hateful" speech from this Hopkins person. Then we could assess for ourselves whether the speech is "hateful" or merely factual and embarrassing to some people.

I shan't hold my breath.
 
It would be helpful if Tommy gave us a few quotes of "hateful" speech from this Hopkins person. Then we could assess for ourselves whether the speech is "hateful" or merely factual and embarrassing to some people.

I shan't hold my breath.
Your opinion, and mine, is immaterial. Her contract was with twitter and they have judged that she has broken that agreement. There is a tool we use over here called google. If you type her name into it you will get a flavour of her output.
 

Forum List

Back
Top