Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Su 35 operates 15000 ft above F35. Huge advantage. Also super cruises while Lightning does not.What altitude disadvantage?because of its altitude disadvantage
Can you show me where you get the official service ceiling for the F-35 and the SU-35?Su 35 operates 15000 ft above F35. Huge advantage.
“When taken as a singular platform, I like the Su-35’s chances against most of our platforms, with perhaps the exception of the F-22 and F-15C,” the naval aviator said. “I suspect the F/A-18E/F can hold it’s own and F-35 has presumed stealth and sensor management on its side.”
There have been plenty of engagements where opposing fighters were capable of very high altitudes, hell a MIG-25 could fly higher than any of these and many have been shot down by F-15s and F-16s.Really when is last time US fighters went up against first line fighters?
Great irony, as you continue to avoid any pretense of backing up any of the random crap you post here.You offer no facts as usual just uninformed opinion,,,,,,,you cant back one word of your post from an authoritative site....not one
The F-4 was adequate for its time, but its exhaust was it's main downfall. No one wants to fly a combat aircraft with a big black line leading to it.
Hey imagine that, you again ignored any and all requests to clarify or explain your claims. What an easy way to debate, just say whatever you want and don't worry about proving it.Llmmmaaaoooo links buddy.....not just your uninformed blabber...
Except you can't. Cause not stealthy .....not to mention only plane that still trails black smoke is B-52 because of old engines.
Oops, General Hostage (the guy you used as a source in another post) says here: Gen. Mike Hostage On The F-35 No Growlers Needed When War Starts Breaking Defense - Defense industry news analysis and commentaryExcept you can't. Cause not stealthy
Not that this forum expects ManOnTheStreet to ever quantify or back up his latest bullshit that the F-35 isn't stealthy.The F-35’s cross section is much smaller than the F-22’s
As evidenced by the hundreds of pictures and videos of the plan showing it flying along without a trail of black smoke......not to mention only plane that still trails black smoke is B-52 because of old engines.
Hah hah, apparently you don't know the definition of the word "not"Cause not stealthy
The F-35 stealthiness is a bit better than the B-2 bomber, which, in turn, was twice as good as that on the even older F-117. B-2 stealth bomber has a very small cross section. The RCS of a B-26 bomber exceeds 35 dBm2 (3100m2 ) from certain angles. In contrast, the RCS of the B-2 stealth bomber is widely reported to be about -40dBm2 .
Not so.... A, you have to be able to shoot that far, farther the shot less chance of a hit..B you have burn thru their integral jamming. ...C once you shoot they see you and They will have altitude and speed and range.....Russians can run passive too with AESA and irst.Except you can't. Cause not stealthy .....not to mention only plane that still trails black smoke is B-52 because of old engines.
I don't have to be 100% stealthy......only more stealthy than you
If I see you first, you are dead
F35 has frontal stealth only.... UnlikevF22 which is all aspectHah hah, apparently you don't know the definition of the word "not"Cause not stealthy
Radar Cross Section RCS
The F-35 stealthiness is a bit better than the B-2 bomber, which, in turn, was twice as good as that on the even older F-117. B-2 stealth bomber has a very small cross section. The RCS of a B-26 bomber exceeds 35 dBm2 (3100m2 ) from certain angles. In contrast, the RCS of the B-2 stealth bomber is widely reported to be about -40dBm2 .
I've been the one providing links.... You're the one talking around and ignoring. Why provide more when you ignore and bsHey imagine that, you again ignored any and all requests to clarify or explain your claims. What an easy way to debate, just say whatever you want and don't worry about proving it.Llmmmaaaoooo links buddy.....not just your uninformed blabber...
So again, just to show what a fool you are since we all know you cannot answer these:
Still waiting on you to explain the measure of the IR signature of the F-35
Still waiting on whether we believe or disbelieve General
Still waiting for you official source on F-35 service ceiling
Still waiting on you explaining about all the air combat that takes place at 65k feet
But wait, you just said the F-35 wasn't stealthy. So when called on your bullshit, you backpedal and now it is only front stealthy?F35 has frontal stealth only.... UnlikevF22 which is all aspect
You provide links to articles from questionable sources, and when proven they have quotes taken out of context you suddenly switch views and declare the source stupid. I can spam as many positive F-35 links as you can negative, that doesn't get us anywhere.I've been the one providing links.... You're the one talking around and ignoring. Why provide more when you ignore and bs
Its not, if its not all aspect its worthless.But wait, you just said the F-35 wasn't stealthy. So when called on your bullshit, you backpedal and now it is only front stealthy?F35 has frontal stealth only.... UnlikevF22 which is all aspect
F-35 stealth is optimized frontal (where it matters most) but it has low observable characteristics favorable compared to 4th gen planes in all aspects, which renders both your first claim (not stealthy) and backpedal claim (only stealthy frontal) as complete bunk.
