Expert reveals tampering in JFK assassination photos

[gipper]

Anyone who chooses to believe the Warren Commission, is willfully blind. It does no good to debate one who does.

One has to look at the totality of events leading up to and afterward, to know that a conspiracy occurred. There is no doubt about it.

Only willfully blind and stupid statists would believe a government that lies 24/7.

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

I have read the Warren Commission Report and dozens of expert's books on the subject. Clearly...you have not.

You are very good at cherry picking one statement or another, then jumping to conclusions. Were you taught this tactic by the CIA?

You have never read the Warren Commission report and have no idea what it says.You know that is true and proven

We established that fact long ago and you are NOT more well read or more informed on this subject than others although that is always the basis of your claims.

I have read dozens of books on the subject as well but from both sides of the argument. the only one cherry picking is you who selects only the books which support your views and ignoring the others such as the Warren Commission report which you lied about.

To prove this point answer this. Cite one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and present the evidence that it is a lie. You have accused the report and it;s authors of lies and being liars so back it up. If your assertion is true and you have read it providing such a direct quote is easy.

I took your own argument to it's logical conclusion so stop being a coward who is frightened of losing an argument and answer the question ARE there any guilty people in prison?

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

I have read the Warren Commission Report and dozens of expert's books on the subject. Clearly...you have not.

You are very good at cherry picking one statement or another, then jumping to conclusions. Were you taught this tactic by the CIA?

You have never read the Warren Commission report and have no idea what it says.You know that is true and proven

We established that fact long ago and you are NOT more well read or more informed on this subject than others although that is always the basis of your claims.

I have read dozens of books on the subject as well but from both sides of the argument. the only one cherry picking is you who selects only the books which support your views and ignoring the others such as the Warren Commission report which you lied about.

To prove this point answer this. Cite one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and present the evidence that it is a lie. You have accused the report and it;s authors of lies and being liars so back it up. If your assertion is true and you have read it providing such a direct quote is easy.

I took your own argument to it's logical conclusion so stop being a coward who is frightened of losing an argument and answer the question ARE there any guilty people in prison?

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

 

[gipper]

I have read the Warren Commission Report and dozens of expert's books on the subject. Clearly...you have not.

You are very good at cherry picking one statement or another, then jumping to conclusions. Were you taught this tactic by the CIA?

You have never read the Warren Commission report and have no idea what it says.You know that is true and proven

We established that fact long ago and you are NOT more well read or more informed on this subject than others although that is always the basis of your claims.

I have read dozens of books on the subject as well but from both sides of the argument. the only one cherry picking is you who selects only the books which support your views and ignoring the others such as the Warren Commission report which you lied about.

To prove this point answer this. Cite one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and present the evidence that it is a lie. You have accused the report and it;s authors of lies and being liars so back it up. If your assertion is true and you have read it providing such a direct quote is easy.

I took your own argument to it's logical conclusion so stop being a coward who is frightened of losing an argument and answer the question ARE there any guilty people in prison?

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

Did you get your training at Langley or was it overseas?

 

[Faun]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

 

[Soupnazi630]

You have never read the Warren Commission report and have no idea what it says.You know that is true and proven

We established that fact long ago and you are NOT more well read or more informed on this subject than others although that is always the basis of your claims.

I have read dozens of books on the subject as well but from both sides of the argument. the only one cherry picking is you who selects only the books which support your views and ignoring the others such as the Warren Commission report which you lied about.

To prove this point answer this. Cite one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and present the evidence that it is a lie. You have accused the report and it;s authors of lies and being liars so back it up. If your assertion is true and you have read it providing such a direct quote is easy.

I took your own argument to it's logical conclusion so stop being a coward who is frightened of losing an argument and answer the question ARE there any guilty people in prison?

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

Did you get your training at Langley or was it overseas?

Asked and answered unlike you who runs from the question.

You cannot answer whether there are any guilty men in prison proving you are a liar ad fool.

You cannot cite any passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and provide evidence proving you never read the Warren commission report and lied about that.

You admit that you know nothing of this issue and are outclassed.

You are beaten and you are my bitch and you know it

 

[Dale Smith]

Oswald never shot anyone nor does the documentary claim that he fired a single. So you really watched it? I have my doubts because there was indeed personal testimony from those that saw other shooters and described them....how did you miss that? How deeply have you even delved into this or have you accepted the official narrative lock, stock and barrel? You keep claiming that "this and that" has been debunked but I have yet to see you post a link to any source....credible or not.
The Warren Commission with crooks like Allen Dulles and a CFR member along with John J McCloy, another CFR member and both were Rockefeller proteges and belonged to the Knights of Malta? Clay Boggs, a Rockefeller friendly puppet that later had misgivings about the "magic bullet theory" and died mysteriously in 72? Gerald Ford, CFR member? If you don't know anything about the CFR, I suggest you take the time to learn about it.

There is no fucking way that a single bullet created all those wounds in Connally and JFK......total bullshit and thus the term "the magic bullet theory". BTW, I believed the official version for a very long time but what I have learned about this corporate entity that lamely attempts to pass itself off as a legitimate governmental body is that they lie their fucking asses off and why can they get away with it? Because they control the media.

Yes I watched it and proved I did demonstrating what thhey claimed. I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots.

They claimed there were 8 shooters and they know the names and even how much they were paid which is total bullshit.I missed nothing and I dare you to provide any such testimony from any such witness

Now you need to understand you are dead wrong NO WITNESS saw another shooter period. One cannot prove a negative therefore the burden is on you to find any sch credible witness who claims to have seen a second shooter YOU WILL Not be able to.

The film mentions such people as Lee Bowers and Mary Moorman and Sam Rowland.

Sam Rowland actually saw one man in the window which Oswald FIRED from he did not testify to seeing a second shooter. Mary Moorman saw no shooter at all she was in fact filming the motorcade.

Lee bowers was actually BEHIND the grassy knoll with a clear unobstructed view of where a shooter would be on the knoll and he saw no one with a gun or firing a gun.

Did you bother to ask why the film never presents a recording or transcript of these people's testimony? They did not do so because the film lies and the producers know none of these people said what the producer CLAIMS they said. The producers lied.

I used the film itself to debunk the film and proved it in that manner the film is contradictory and offers no evidence. I have yet to see a link from you either,,

As I have said it is not bullshit. Many battlefield accounts of bullets striking more than one person exist and when that happens there WILL be multiple wounds so you are merely proving you know nothing about gun fire.

The rest of your post about CFR and Crooks is irrelevant as it is just opinion and doe snot constitute evidence.

unlike you I have evidence i have facts you have belief and faith in delusional films

"The film is wrong from the first few words when it claims that Oswald shot from an office building when in fact it was a warehouse"


Then you claimed "I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots"


What witnesses are those? The police claims that three shells were found on the 6th floor....so who are the witnesses that claim Lee Harvey Oswald fired ANY shot, much less three of them?

BTW, I did a little peeking into your posting history here. Outside of a couple of other threads, you concentrate on 9/11 and the JFK murder by the CIA and even took a nearly two year sabbatical from here......care to explain as to why that is?

The CFR is not relevant? I believe it is because it is the "Good ol Boys club" of the Rockefellers and their globalist pals. The CFR is just an offshoot of Chatham House in England. Kennedy had silver certificates printed that were backed by silver thus a direct attack on the Federal Reserve that is owned mostly by international bankers along with the Rockefellers that are one of the thirteen shareholders of it. He was going to prevent a full blown war in Vietnam that would have enriched the Military industrial complex at our expense and those that held gold with the Fed per the Bretton Woods agreement. The stoppage of the Vietnam War meant that these thieves would be denied access to the heroin produced in the Golden Triangle of Asia.

He and his brother were going after the Mafia which meant J.Edgar Hoover would have to go because he had been compromised by the mob. Plenty of suspects that had a vested interest in seeing him gone. There are just too many coincidences that doesn't pass my "sniff test" after a little due diligence. There was a final coup d'etat the day he was killed and the ones behind it and their proteges have only further embedded themselves in so many places of influence that keeps this fiat currency/debt slavery system in place. I only have around 19,000 hours invested in the things I know. Thus far all I have seen from you is the "Uh-uh" defense while believing and touting every fucking thing these crooks claim as to be factual when common sense says otherwise.

The witnesses I referred to are the hundreds of people who were in Dealey plaza that day. I never said they were EYE witnesses.

The truth is NO ONE saw any man firing a gun except perhaps for a 11 year old boy who was standing infront of the TSBD and looked up to see what he though was a rifle being fired many floors up above his head and he did not see who was shooting it.

The witnesses who support the Warren Commission are EAR witnesses who heard the shooting while looking at Kennedy.

There are two main issue at hand here the first is the number of shots fired and the second is where those shots seemd to come from.

90% of all the witnesses agree that there were 3 and only 3 shots fired which is a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists who claim 3 to 8 shooters and multiple rifles. We know Oswald fired 3 shots based on physical evidence and the VAST majority of witnesses support that fact.

The remainder heard 1 or 2 or 4 or 5 or 7 shots or even one witness who claims to have heard a heavy machine firing a long burst. These witnesses are simply wrong and not credible and THAT is to be expected. Whenever there are multiple witnesses there will ALWAYS be some who remember it wrong. Of course conspiracy fools always ignore this and focus on the few who got it wrong ignoring the rest and ignoring the physical evidence which is what proves them wrong in the first place. Notice the conspiracy fools have no expended shell casings. The only ones found were from Oswald's rifle. They have no other weapon recovered and they have no expended bullets. Those three things alone are damning evidence and would sink any defendant in any court. There is a great deal more evidence against Oswald as well but not one piece of physical evidence for anyone else shooting.

Close to 70% of all witnesses found identify the Texas School book Depository as the source of the shots and no other source. This is less than the witnesses who heard 3 shots but still the largest number You would expect it to be less because identifying he source of noise is not as easy as counting large bangs such as a gun shot. But it is also still a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists since once again the vast majority heard a source consistent with the physical evidence. The remainder of witnesses again are all over the map. Some heard it coming from the knoll or from the triple underpass or from INSIDE the limo or even from a sewer drain and all are simply wrong as the evidence proves.

I stopped posting when other people did simply because I see no point in talking to myself.

Yes the CFR is irrelevant. None of what you say about the CFR constitutes evidence that they or anyone besides Oswald killed kennedy. You do not like them and think they are some monstrous group that controls everything but once again this proves only what YOU believe not what they did

Kennedy was not going to prevent the war in Vietnam he was expanding it and Johnson merely followed the same policy put in place by Kennedy before his death.

There is no Evidence Hoover was compromised either such tales are in fact fiction.

Evidence is what counts not smell tests you have no evidence you have only a suspicious fear of CFR and other shadowy group

Anyone who chooses to believe the Warren Commission, is willfully blind. It does no good to debate one who does.

One has to look at the totality of events leading up to and afterward, to know that a conspiracy occurred. There is no doubt about it.

Only willfully blind and stupid statists would believe a government that lies 24/7.

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

 

[Dale Smith]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

Barrypuppet's certificate has been proven by any shadow of a doubt to be fraudulent. Corsi has been validated.

Sucks to be you.

 

[MindWars]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

Barrypuppet's certificate has been proven by any shadow of a doubt to be fraudulent. Corsi has been validated.

Sucks to be you.

That fkr is so retarded they don't know thier ass from a hole in the ground.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

I have read the Warren Commission Report and dozens of expert's books on the subject. Clearly...you have not.

You are very good at cherry picking one statement or another, then jumping to conclusions. Were you taught this tactic by the CIA?

You have never read the Warren Commission report and have no idea what it says.You know that is true and proven

We established that fact long ago and you are NOT more well read or more informed on this subject than others although that is always the basis of your claims.

I have read dozens of books on the subject as well but from both sides of the argument. the only one cherry picking is you who selects only the books which support your views and ignoring the others such as the Warren Commission report which you lied about.

To prove this point answer this. Cite one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and present the evidence that it is a lie. You have accused the report and it;s authors of lies and being liars so back it up. If your assertion is true and you have read it providing such a direct quote is easy.

I took your own argument to it's logical conclusion so stop being a coward who is frightened of losing an argument and answer the question ARE there any guilty people in prison?

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Yes I watched it and proved I did demonstrating what thhey claimed. I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots.

They claimed there were 8 shooters and they know the names and even how much they were paid which is total bullshit.I missed nothing and I dare you to provide any such testimony from any such witness

Now you need to understand you are dead wrong NO WITNESS saw another shooter period. One cannot prove a negative therefore the burden is on you to find any sch credible witness who claims to have seen a second shooter YOU WILL Not be able to.

The film mentions such people as Lee Bowers and Mary Moorman and Sam Rowland.

Sam Rowland actually saw one man in the window which Oswald FIRED from he did not testify to seeing a second shooter. Mary Moorman saw no shooter at all she was in fact filming the motorcade.

Lee bowers was actually BEHIND the grassy knoll with a clear unobstructed view of where a shooter would be on the knoll and he saw no one with a gun or firing a gun.

Did you bother to ask why the film never presents a recording or transcript of these people's testimony? They did not do so because the film lies and the producers know none of these people said what the producer CLAIMS they said. The producers lied.

I used the film itself to debunk the film and proved it in that manner the film is contradictory and offers no evidence. I have yet to see a link from you either,,

As I have said it is not bullshit. Many battlefield accounts of bullets striking more than one person exist and when that happens there WILL be multiple wounds so you are merely proving you know nothing about gun fire.

The rest of your post about CFR and Crooks is irrelevant as it is just opinion and doe snot constitute evidence.

unlike you I have evidence i have facts you have belief and faith in delusional films

"The film is wrong from the first few words when it claims that Oswald shot from an office building when in fact it was a warehouse"


Then you claimed "I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots"


What witnesses are those? The police claims that three shells were found on the 6th floor....so who are the witnesses that claim Lee Harvey Oswald fired ANY shot, much less three of them?

BTW, I did a little peeking into your posting history here. Outside of a couple of other threads, you concentrate on 9/11 and the JFK murder by the CIA and even took a nearly two year sabbatical from here......care to explain as to why that is?

The CFR is not relevant? I believe it is because it is the "Good ol Boys club" of the Rockefellers and their globalist pals. The CFR is just an offshoot of Chatham House in England. Kennedy had silver certificates printed that were backed by silver thus a direct attack on the Federal Reserve that is owned mostly by international bankers along with the Rockefellers that are one of the thirteen shareholders of it. He was going to prevent a full blown war in Vietnam that would have enriched the Military industrial complex at our expense and those that held gold with the Fed per the Bretton Woods agreement. The stoppage of the Vietnam War meant that these thieves would be denied access to the heroin produced in the Golden Triangle of Asia.

He and his brother were going after the Mafia which meant J.Edgar Hoover would have to go because he had been compromised by the mob. Plenty of suspects that had a vested interest in seeing him gone. There are just too many coincidences that doesn't pass my "sniff test" after a little due diligence. There was a final coup d'etat the day he was killed and the ones behind it and their proteges have only further embedded themselves in so many places of influence that keeps this fiat currency/debt slavery system in place. I only have around 19,000 hours invested in the things I know. Thus far all I have seen from you is the "Uh-uh" defense while believing and touting every fucking thing these crooks claim as to be factual when common sense says otherwise.

The witnesses I referred to are the hundreds of people who were in Dealey plaza that day. I never said they were EYE witnesses.

The truth is NO ONE saw any man firing a gun except perhaps for a 11 year old boy who was standing infront of the TSBD and looked up to see what he though was a rifle being fired many floors up above his head and he did not see who was shooting it.

The witnesses who support the Warren Commission are EAR witnesses who heard the shooting while looking at Kennedy.

There are two main issue at hand here the first is the number of shots fired and the second is where those shots seemd to come from.

90% of all the witnesses agree that there were 3 and only 3 shots fired which is a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists who claim 3 to 8 shooters and multiple rifles. We know Oswald fired 3 shots based on physical evidence and the VAST majority of witnesses support that fact.

The remainder heard 1 or 2 or 4 or 5 or 7 shots or even one witness who claims to have heard a heavy machine firing a long burst. These witnesses are simply wrong and not credible and THAT is to be expected. Whenever there are multiple witnesses there will ALWAYS be some who remember it wrong. Of course conspiracy fools always ignore this and focus on the few who got it wrong ignoring the rest and ignoring the physical evidence which is what proves them wrong in the first place. Notice the conspiracy fools have no expended shell casings. The only ones found were from Oswald's rifle. They have no other weapon recovered and they have no expended bullets. Those three things alone are damning evidence and would sink any defendant in any court. There is a great deal more evidence against Oswald as well but not one piece of physical evidence for anyone else shooting.

Close to 70% of all witnesses found identify the Texas School book Depository as the source of the shots and no other source. This is less than the witnesses who heard 3 shots but still the largest number You would expect it to be less because identifying he source of noise is not as easy as counting large bangs such as a gun shot. But it is also still a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists since once again the vast majority heard a source consistent with the physical evidence. The remainder of witnesses again are all over the map. Some heard it coming from the knoll or from the triple underpass or from INSIDE the limo or even from a sewer drain and all are simply wrong as the evidence proves.

I stopped posting when other people did simply because I see no point in talking to myself.

Yes the CFR is irrelevant. None of what you say about the CFR constitutes evidence that they or anyone besides Oswald killed kennedy. You do not like them and think they are some monstrous group that controls everything but once again this proves only what YOU believe not what they did

Kennedy was not going to prevent the war in Vietnam he was expanding it and Johnson merely followed the same policy put in place by Kennedy before his death.

There is no Evidence Hoover was compromised either such tales are in fact fiction.

Evidence is what counts not smell tests you have no evidence you have only a suspicious fear of CFR and other shadowy group

Anyone who chooses to believe the Warren Commission, is willfully blind. It does no good to debate one who does.

One has to look at the totality of events leading up to and afterward, to know that a conspiracy occurred. There is no doubt about it.

Only willfully blind and stupid statists would believe a government that lies 24/7.

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

Barrypuppet's certificate has been proven by any shadow of a doubt to be fraudulent. Corsi has been validated.

Sucks to be you.

yeah indeed must suck being him having to cry to his boss all the time at Langley for more raises to put up with the ass beatings he gets here everyday.

 

[Dale Smith]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

Barrypuppet's certificate has been proven by any shadow of a doubt to be fraudulent. Corsi has been validated.

Sucks to be you.

That fkr is so retarded they don't know thier ass from a hole in the ground.

I am not sure if these naysayers are just ignorant and programmed morons or paid shills....but either way? Their replies have been utterly pitiful and sad.

 

[Dale Smith]

You have never read the Warren Commission report and have no idea what it says.You know that is true and proven

We established that fact long ago and you are NOT more well read or more informed on this subject than others although that is always the basis of your claims.

I have read dozens of books on the subject as well but from both sides of the argument. the only one cherry picking is you who selects only the books which support your views and ignoring the others such as the Warren Commission report which you lied about.

To prove this point answer this. Cite one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and present the evidence that it is a lie. You have accused the report and it;s authors of lies and being liars so back it up. If your assertion is true and you have read it providing such a direct quote is easy.

I took your own argument to it's logical conclusion so stop being a coward who is frightened of losing an argument and answer the question ARE there any guilty people in prison?

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

Did you get your training at Langley or was it overseas?

Gipper, you have more than busted this poseur and exposed him for being a fraud. I salute you and anyone else that takes the path of least resistance and refuses to be intimidated into falling for the "groupspeak" tactic.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes I watched it and proved I did demonstrating what thhey claimed. I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots.

They claimed there were 8 shooters and they know the names and even how much they were paid which is total bullshit.I missed nothing and I dare you to provide any such testimony from any such witness

Now you need to understand you are dead wrong NO WITNESS saw another shooter period. One cannot prove a negative therefore the burden is on you to find any sch credible witness who claims to have seen a second shooter YOU WILL Not be able to.

The film mentions such people as Lee Bowers and Mary Moorman and Sam Rowland.

Sam Rowland actually saw one man in the window which Oswald FIRED from he did not testify to seeing a second shooter. Mary Moorman saw no shooter at all she was in fact filming the motorcade.

Lee bowers was actually BEHIND the grassy knoll with a clear unobstructed view of where a shooter would be on the knoll and he saw no one with a gun or firing a gun.

Did you bother to ask why the film never presents a recording or transcript of these people's testimony? They did not do so because the film lies and the producers know none of these people said what the producer CLAIMS they said. The producers lied.

I used the film itself to debunk the film and proved it in that manner the film is contradictory and offers no evidence. I have yet to see a link from you either,,

As I have said it is not bullshit. Many battlefield accounts of bullets striking more than one person exist and when that happens there WILL be multiple wounds so you are merely proving you know nothing about gun fire.

The rest of your post about CFR and Crooks is irrelevant as it is just opinion and doe snot constitute evidence.

unlike you I have evidence i have facts you have belief and faith in delusional films

"The film is wrong from the first few words when it claims that Oswald shot from an office building when in fact it was a warehouse"


Then you claimed "I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots"


What witnesses are those? The police claims that three shells were found on the 6th floor....so who are the witnesses that claim Lee Harvey Oswald fired ANY shot, much less three of them?

BTW, I did a little peeking into your posting history here. Outside of a couple of other threads, you concentrate on 9/11 and the JFK murder by the CIA and even took a nearly two year sabbatical from here......care to explain as to why that is?

The CFR is not relevant? I believe it is because it is the "Good ol Boys club" of the Rockefellers and their globalist pals. The CFR is just an offshoot of Chatham House in England. Kennedy had silver certificates printed that were backed by silver thus a direct attack on the Federal Reserve that is owned mostly by international bankers along with the Rockefellers that are one of the thirteen shareholders of it. He was going to prevent a full blown war in Vietnam that would have enriched the Military industrial complex at our expense and those that held gold with the Fed per the Bretton Woods agreement. The stoppage of the Vietnam War meant that these thieves would be denied access to the heroin produced in the Golden Triangle of Asia.

He and his brother were going after the Mafia which meant J.Edgar Hoover would have to go because he had been compromised by the mob. Plenty of suspects that had a vested interest in seeing him gone. There are just too many coincidences that doesn't pass my "sniff test" after a little due diligence. There was a final coup d'etat the day he was killed and the ones behind it and their proteges have only further embedded themselves in so many places of influence that keeps this fiat currency/debt slavery system in place. I only have around 19,000 hours invested in the things I know. Thus far all I have seen from you is the "Uh-uh" defense while believing and touting every fucking thing these crooks claim as to be factual when common sense says otherwise.

The witnesses I referred to are the hundreds of people who were in Dealey plaza that day. I never said they were EYE witnesses.

The truth is NO ONE saw any man firing a gun except perhaps for a 11 year old boy who was standing infront of the TSBD and looked up to see what he though was a rifle being fired many floors up above his head and he did not see who was shooting it.

The witnesses who support the Warren Commission are EAR witnesses who heard the shooting while looking at Kennedy.

There are two main issue at hand here the first is the number of shots fired and the second is where those shots seemd to come from.

90% of all the witnesses agree that there were 3 and only 3 shots fired which is a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists who claim 3 to 8 shooters and multiple rifles. We know Oswald fired 3 shots based on physical evidence and the VAST majority of witnesses support that fact.

The remainder heard 1 or 2 or 4 or 5 or 7 shots or even one witness who claims to have heard a heavy machine firing a long burst. These witnesses are simply wrong and not credible and THAT is to be expected. Whenever there are multiple witnesses there will ALWAYS be some who remember it wrong. Of course conspiracy fools always ignore this and focus on the few who got it wrong ignoring the rest and ignoring the physical evidence which is what proves them wrong in the first place. Notice the conspiracy fools have no expended shell casings. The only ones found were from Oswald's rifle. They have no other weapon recovered and they have no expended bullets. Those three things alone are damning evidence and would sink any defendant in any court. There is a great deal more evidence against Oswald as well but not one piece of physical evidence for anyone else shooting.

Close to 70% of all witnesses found identify the Texas School book Depository as the source of the shots and no other source. This is less than the witnesses who heard 3 shots but still the largest number You would expect it to be less because identifying he source of noise is not as easy as counting large bangs such as a gun shot. But it is also still a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists since once again the vast majority heard a source consistent with the physical evidence. The remainder of witnesses again are all over the map. Some heard it coming from the knoll or from the triple underpass or from INSIDE the limo or even from a sewer drain and all are simply wrong as the evidence proves.

I stopped posting when other people did simply because I see no point in talking to myself.

Yes the CFR is irrelevant. None of what you say about the CFR constitutes evidence that they or anyone besides Oswald killed kennedy. You do not like them and think they are some monstrous group that controls everything but once again this proves only what YOU believe not what they did

Kennedy was not going to prevent the war in Vietnam he was expanding it and Johnson merely followed the same policy put in place by Kennedy before his death.

There is no Evidence Hoover was compromised either such tales are in fact fiction.

Evidence is what counts not smell tests you have no evidence you have only a suspicious fear of CFR and other shadowy group

Anyone who chooses to believe the Warren Commission, is willfully blind. It does no good to debate one who does.

One has to look at the totality of events leading up to and afterward, to know that a conspiracy occurred. There is no doubt about it.

Only willfully blind and stupid statists would believe a government that lies 24/7.

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You keep posting long winded ignorant posts. Please continue.

Again...did the CIA train you to do this?

you keep posting blanket statements with no evidence or support of any kind whatsoever.

Answer the questions.

Are the any guilty men in prison?

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

No the CIA did not train me.

Now I answered you so go ahead and man up.

The evidence is EVERYWHERE...but to the stupid easily duped Statist, it can't be comprehended.

Stop being a pussy and accept the truth.

you keep making blanket statements like " the evidence is everywhere " but you cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no such evidence to cite sonny boy.

Go ahead and present some which has not been massively shredded and debunked.

BTW BOY a pussy is one who runs away from defending their positions you aksed a stupid question about the CIA and I answered.

I asked you two simple question and you ran proving your self a coward and the only real pussy so answer now.

Stop lying stop evading and dodging and answer the to questions i asked you or you admit to being outclassed and to being a cheap coward who has been pwned.

Are there any guilty men in prison?

Cite one specific quote from the Warren Commission which is a lie and present evidence that it is a lie

Did you get your training at Langley or was it overseas?

Gipper, you have more than busted this poseur and exposed him for being a fraud. I salute you and anyone else that takes the path of least resistance and refuses to be intimidated into falling for the "groupspeak" tactic.

No he did not sonny boy he got humiliated and ran away because he was proven wrong and that is fact and you know it

 

[Soupnazi630]

"The film is wrong from the first few words when it claims that Oswald shot from an office building when in fact it was a warehouse"


Then you claimed "I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots"


What witnesses are those? The police claims that three shells were found on the 6th floor....so who are the witnesses that claim Lee Harvey Oswald fired ANY shot, much less three of them?

BTW, I did a little peeking into your posting history here. Outside of a couple of other threads, you concentrate on 9/11 and the JFK murder by the CIA and even took a nearly two year sabbatical from here......care to explain as to why that is?

The CFR is not relevant? I believe it is because it is the "Good ol Boys club" of the Rockefellers and their globalist pals. The CFR is just an offshoot of Chatham House in England. Kennedy had silver certificates printed that were backed by silver thus a direct attack on the Federal Reserve that is owned mostly by international bankers along with the Rockefellers that are one of the thirteen shareholders of it. He was going to prevent a full blown war in Vietnam that would have enriched the Military industrial complex at our expense and those that held gold with the Fed per the Bretton Woods agreement. The stoppage of the Vietnam War meant that these thieves would be denied access to the heroin produced in the Golden Triangle of Asia.

He and his brother were going after the Mafia which meant J.Edgar Hoover would have to go because he had been compromised by the mob. Plenty of suspects that had a vested interest in seeing him gone. There are just too many coincidences that doesn't pass my "sniff test" after a little due diligence. There was a final coup d'etat the day he was killed and the ones behind it and their proteges have only further embedded themselves in so many places of influence that keeps this fiat currency/debt slavery system in place. I only have around 19,000 hours invested in the things I know. Thus far all I have seen from you is the "Uh-uh" defense while believing and touting every fucking thing these crooks claim as to be factual when common sense says otherwise.

The witnesses I referred to are the hundreds of people who were in Dealey plaza that day. I never said they were EYE witnesses.

The truth is NO ONE saw any man firing a gun except perhaps for a 11 year old boy who was standing infront of the TSBD and looked up to see what he though was a rifle being fired many floors up above his head and he did not see who was shooting it.

The witnesses who support the Warren Commission are EAR witnesses who heard the shooting while looking at Kennedy.

There are two main issue at hand here the first is the number of shots fired and the second is where those shots seemd to come from.

90% of all the witnesses agree that there were 3 and only 3 shots fired which is a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists who claim 3 to 8 shooters and multiple rifles. We know Oswald fired 3 shots based on physical evidence and the VAST majority of witnesses support that fact.

The remainder heard 1 or 2 or 4 or 5 or 7 shots or even one witness who claims to have heard a heavy machine firing a long burst. These witnesses are simply wrong and not credible and THAT is to be expected. Whenever there are multiple witnesses there will ALWAYS be some who remember it wrong. Of course conspiracy fools always ignore this and focus on the few who got it wrong ignoring the rest and ignoring the physical evidence which is what proves them wrong in the first place. Notice the conspiracy fools have no expended shell casings. The only ones found were from Oswald's rifle. They have no other weapon recovered and they have no expended bullets. Those three things alone are damning evidence and would sink any defendant in any court. There is a great deal more evidence against Oswald as well but not one piece of physical evidence for anyone else shooting.

Close to 70% of all witnesses found identify the Texas School book Depository as the source of the shots and no other source. This is less than the witnesses who heard 3 shots but still the largest number You would expect it to be less because identifying he source of noise is not as easy as counting large bangs such as a gun shot. But it is also still a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists since once again the vast majority heard a source consistent with the physical evidence. The remainder of witnesses again are all over the map. Some heard it coming from the knoll or from the triple underpass or from INSIDE the limo or even from a sewer drain and all are simply wrong as the evidence proves.

I stopped posting when other people did simply because I see no point in talking to myself.

Yes the CFR is irrelevant. None of what you say about the CFR constitutes evidence that they or anyone besides Oswald killed kennedy. You do not like them and think they are some monstrous group that controls everything but once again this proves only what YOU believe not what they did

Kennedy was not going to prevent the war in Vietnam he was expanding it and Johnson merely followed the same policy put in place by Kennedy before his death.

There is no Evidence Hoover was compromised either such tales are in fact fiction.

Evidence is what counts not smell tests you have no evidence you have only a suspicious fear of CFR and other shadowy group

Anyone who chooses to believe the Warren Commission, is willfully blind. It does no good to debate one who does.

One has to look at the totality of events leading up to and afterward, to know that a conspiracy occurred. There is no doubt about it.

Only willfully blind and stupid statists would believe a government that lies 24/7.

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

LARAM

 

[MindWars]

&

According to Politico, the CIA mail-opening program, which was later determined to have been blatantly illegal, had the code name HTLINGUAL. “It would be surprising if the DCI [director of central intelligence] were not told about the program” after the Kennedy assassination, the report reads. “If not, his subordinates deceived him. If he did know about HTLINGUAL reporting on Oswald, he was not being forthright with the commission—presumably to protect an operation that was highly compartmented and, if disclosed, sure to arouse much controversy.”


53 Years After JFK Assassination and CIA Admits this Conspiracy THEORY is Actually FACT

http://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//NSAEBB/NSAEBB493/docs/intell_ebb_026.PDF

 

[Dale Smith]

"The film is wrong from the first few words when it claims that Oswald shot from an office building when in fact it was a warehouse"


Then you claimed "I never said that the film made a claim that Oswald fired a single. The evidence proves and is supprted by the vast majority of witnesses that yes he fired 3 shots"


What witnesses are those? The police claims that three shells were found on the 6th floor....so who are the witnesses that claim Lee Harvey Oswald fired ANY shot, much less three of them?

BTW, I did a little peeking into your posting history here. Outside of a couple of other threads, you concentrate on 9/11 and the JFK murder by the CIA and even took a nearly two year sabbatical from here......care to explain as to why that is?

The CFR is not relevant? I believe it is because it is the "Good ol Boys club" of the Rockefellers and their globalist pals. The CFR is just an offshoot of Chatham House in England. Kennedy had silver certificates printed that were backed by silver thus a direct attack on the Federal Reserve that is owned mostly by international bankers along with the Rockefellers that are one of the thirteen shareholders of it. He was going to prevent a full blown war in Vietnam that would have enriched the Military industrial complex at our expense and those that held gold with the Fed per the Bretton Woods agreement. The stoppage of the Vietnam War meant that these thieves would be denied access to the heroin produced in the Golden Triangle of Asia.

He and his brother were going after the Mafia which meant J.Edgar Hoover would have to go because he had been compromised by the mob. Plenty of suspects that had a vested interest in seeing him gone. There are just too many coincidences that doesn't pass my "sniff test" after a little due diligence. There was a final coup d'etat the day he was killed and the ones behind it and their proteges have only further embedded themselves in so many places of influence that keeps this fiat currency/debt slavery system in place. I only have around 19,000 hours invested in the things I know. Thus far all I have seen from you is the "Uh-uh" defense while believing and touting every fucking thing these crooks claim as to be factual when common sense says otherwise.

The witnesses I referred to are the hundreds of people who were in Dealey plaza that day. I never said they were EYE witnesses.

The truth is NO ONE saw any man firing a gun except perhaps for a 11 year old boy who was standing infront of the TSBD and looked up to see what he though was a rifle being fired many floors up above his head and he did not see who was shooting it.

The witnesses who support the Warren Commission are EAR witnesses who heard the shooting while looking at Kennedy.

There are two main issue at hand here the first is the number of shots fired and the second is where those shots seemd to come from.

90% of all the witnesses agree that there were 3 and only 3 shots fired which is a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists who claim 3 to 8 shooters and multiple rifles. We know Oswald fired 3 shots based on physical evidence and the VAST majority of witnesses support that fact.

The remainder heard 1 or 2 or 4 or 5 or 7 shots or even one witness who claims to have heard a heavy machine firing a long burst. These witnesses are simply wrong and not credible and THAT is to be expected. Whenever there are multiple witnesses there will ALWAYS be some who remember it wrong. Of course conspiracy fools always ignore this and focus on the few who got it wrong ignoring the rest and ignoring the physical evidence which is what proves them wrong in the first place. Notice the conspiracy fools have no expended shell casings. The only ones found were from Oswald's rifle. They have no other weapon recovered and they have no expended bullets. Those three things alone are damning evidence and would sink any defendant in any court. There is a great deal more evidence against Oswald as well but not one piece of physical evidence for anyone else shooting.

Close to 70% of all witnesses found identify the Texas School book Depository as the source of the shots and no other source. This is less than the witnesses who heard 3 shots but still the largest number You would expect it to be less because identifying he source of noise is not as easy as counting large bangs such as a gun shot. But it is also still a deadly blow to conspiracy theorists since once again the vast majority heard a source consistent with the physical evidence. The remainder of witnesses again are all over the map. Some heard it coming from the knoll or from the triple underpass or from INSIDE the limo or even from a sewer drain and all are simply wrong as the evidence proves.

I stopped posting when other people did simply because I see no point in talking to myself.

Yes the CFR is irrelevant. None of what you say about the CFR constitutes evidence that they or anyone besides Oswald killed kennedy. You do not like them and think they are some monstrous group that controls everything but once again this proves only what YOU believe not what they did

Kennedy was not going to prevent the war in Vietnam he was expanding it and Johnson merely followed the same policy put in place by Kennedy before his death.

There is no Evidence Hoover was compromised either such tales are in fact fiction.

Evidence is what counts not smell tests you have no evidence you have only a suspicious fear of CFR and other shadowy group

Anyone who chooses to believe the Warren Commission, is willfully blind. It does no good to debate one who does.

One has to look at the totality of events leading up to and afterward, to know that a conspiracy occurred. There is no doubt about it.

Only willfully blind and stupid statists would believe a government that lies 24/7.

Anyone who claims that believing in something which is based on evidence is a willfully ignorant fool. Especially when they have never read what they claim to not believe in.

You have never read the Warren commission report and have no idea what it says and have never challenged or discredited or refuted it,Beliefs are fine but they prove nothing you can believe the earth is flat all day and ignore the evidence to the contrary and the same is true here. The evidence proves wrong and you willfully ignore it.

You do this , by your own admission, based on a faulty and delusional belief which is that the government lies 24/7

One need not be a statist to grasp the fact that often the government leis AND often tells the truth. Sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. In this case they were right and presented the evidence to prove it which once again you cannot even challenge since you have no idea what they said or what the evidence is. Instead you trust a few videos and movies to tell you what to think and blithely obey your masters.

Simple test to prove this fact answer this question: are there ANY guilty people in prison or are they all innocent?

If your insane belief that the government lies 24/7 is true then it follows there can be no guilty convicts and every incarcerated person is actually innocent.

So answer the question just remember you cannot have it both ways.

The preponderance of the evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only was Oswald a patsy that had no involvement in the shooting and that the crime scene was secured by Deep State operatives even to the point of removing his body at gunpoint. Your contention that the bullet that fell out of the thigh of Connally wasn't in great shape if not in pristine condition is also a like because I have seen exhibit 399 and outside of the markings caused by the barrel (which all fired bullets will have) it's in nearly pristine condition. Whom was selected to do the autopsy of the most important person in America at the time? One that had never done an autopsy of which a gunshot was the cause. Sorry, dude, you repeat talking points of the very ones involved in the cover-up and touting their point of view. Thus far I remain unimpressed.

That is not even opinion it is an outright lie.

You have presented no evidence of any kind ergo there is no such preponderance. The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence.

If there were a preponderance of evidence as you wrongfully claim you could easily cite some BUT YOU CANNOT.

The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself.

You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists.

I am repeating facts you are repeating falsehoods you never bothered to research and are naively falling for because you saw it in a movie


So far every attempt you have made to produce evidence has failed and been debunked so there is no preponderance of evidence as you Claim as you claim of a conspiracy or that Oswald was a patsy.

"That is not even opinion it is an outright lie"

Nope, it is a fact......one or two anomalies or coincidences do not conspiracy make but when there are literally dozens of things that do not add up nor can be refuted? Yeah, the preponderance of the evidence shows that there was without a doubt a conspiracy by this corporate entity that you lovingly refer to as "gubermint".

"The evidence in fact proves the opposite as i have laid out and shown that Oswald acted alone and your entire claims is based on innuendo, grasping at straws, and speculation sorry but none of those things are evidence"

A spare to fair marksman like Oswald did not get off 3 shots with a bolt action rifle in the amount of time claimed....PERIOD. The radio station KLIF that was covering his trip down Elm proves that there were two shots fired within a second of each other and the shots didn't hit anything. It was a pathetic attempt at a cover-up given what we know now and for you to lamely claim otherwise is the last refuge of someone that is incredibly blinded or simply a disinfo agent......either way? It has been amusing watching you flail away.

"The bullet was never in pristine condition or near pristine condition it was caved in damaged and missing mass just as one would expect from a bullet performing as it did you are proven wrong on that by the exhibit itself"

This is the funniest part of your argument ........the magic bullet that zig zagged around causing multiple injuries and then working it's way onto the gurney of Connally. Don't you realize how fucking stupid that comes across????

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical than We Knew

This bullet busted ribs and the wrist of Connally.......looks pretty intact to me.

You can't explain how the right side of Kennedy's head pushes to the left when the bullshit story that he was shot in the back of the head would push his head to the front with perhaps a "snap back reflex" and as doctored as the Zapruder film was (which it was) even they couldn't spin that one. His brain didn't leak out from the back of the head, it was the right hand side of the skull was blown to shit.


"You are also dead wrong about the expert and experienced Pathologists who performed the autopsies they had in fact done many autopsies on bodies of victims of violent events and crimes including gunshot victims. Commander James Thornton Boswell was the man in charge of the autopsy whom you could not even name and he was not selected he was in fact the chief pathologist on duty at Bethesda which was the site for the autopsy chosen by Jackie Kennedy. Boswell and his colleagues did indeed have great experience at examining gun shot victims which is WHY they were chief pathologists"

Nope, you are "dead wrong" and it is revisionist history after the fact. Boswell burned his notes? Gee, I wonder why. I will give you credit for one thing, you definitely toe the "corporate line" but you lose and lose badly.

 

[Faun]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

Barrypuppet's certificate has been proven by any shadow of a doubt to be fraudulent. Corsi has been validated.

Sucks to be you.

Only in the minds of the looniest of retards. Like you.

 

[Faun]

Dr. Jerome Corsi and researcher Ralph C. Cinque examine evidence of photographic manipulation related to the CIA and FBI’s investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.


Expert Reveals Tampering in JFK Assassination Photos
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most people who have a grain of logic left should be asking why has his record been kept secret for so long, Long after everyone is dead anyway.
Do they not want the people to see how far back a deep state, crooked Government really goes. Or do they not even care knowing most leftist sheep wouldn't believe it anyway.

Jerome Corsi???

The idiot who was disgraced over Obama's birth certificate??

Barrypuppet's certificate has been proven by any shadow of a doubt to be fraudulent. Corsi has been validated.

Sucks to be you.

yeah indeed must suck being him having to cry to his boss all the time at Langley for more raises to put up with the ass beatings he gets here everyday.

You freaks are truly crazier than dog shit.