The kooks do realize that the no-burn policy was rescinded around 1970, right?
They should also explain why "management" is necessary now, given the forests survived millions of years without it. It's an amazingly retarded theory they're putting forth here, even dumber than denialism. No wonder they can't get any normal people to buy it.
So why this thread then? Because they're conservatives. That means they get the shakes if they can't wail about the evil gubmint 6 times a day. We should give them a bit of a pass, given they suffer from a hysterical emotional condition.
Oh, Elizabeth Nickson is a big "Agenda 21" conspiracy theorist. That's the source the OP is using.
It was? It seems the Forest Service wasn't aware of that fact. I don't know admiral, your credibility has been under a cloud for a very long time and when you reinforce it with incredibly stupid statements like that you just do yourself more harm. Maybe you're like Alec Baldwin and just can't shut yourself up? Maybe you have a psychological problem?
Maybe you should seek professional help...
Forest Service Fire Policy Change May Let More Wildfires Burn Out Naturally
By JASON DEAREN 03/08/13 03:48 AM ET EST AP
Forest Service Fire Policy Change May Let More Wildfires Burn Out Naturally