Emails from the leftwing groups, attacking Judge Roberts

Discussion in 'Politics' started by -Cp, Jul 20, 2005.

  1. -Cp
    Offline

    -Cp Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,911
    Thanks Received:
    360
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Earth
    Ratings:
    +363
    Here are some blast emails being sent out by the looney left, attacking Judge John Roberts:

    0400

    Moveon.org: ************* Supreme Court: Petition to Stop Corporate Lawyer Roberts

    Last night, President Bush nominated a right-wing lawyer and corporate lobbyist to take Justice O'Connor's seat on the Supreme Court. Tell your senators to oppose Roberts now by signing the petition at:

    Dear MoveOn member, In the past weeks, Republicans and Democrats have called on President Bush to nominate a moderate for the Supreme Court—someone who would honor the legacy of independent Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. But last night, President Bush nominated Judge John Roberts, a far-right lawyer and corporate lobbyist, to fill her post on the Supreme Court.

    We've got to stop Roberts. He opposed clean air rules and worked to help coal companies strip-mine mountaintops. He worked with Ken Starr (yes, that Ken Starr), and tried to keep Congress from defending the Voting Rights Act. He wrote that Roe v. Wade should be "overruled," and as a lawyer argued (and won) the case that stopped some doctors from even discussing abortion.

    Join our urgent petition to let our senators know we expect them to oppose John Roberts right now at:

    http://political.moveon.org/roberts/?id=

    This is one of the most important domestic fights of President Bush's career. We can win—Americans overwhelmingly want a moderate judge. But to win, we need to get the word out early that Roberts is out of the mainstream.

    After you've signed, please send this message on to your friends and colleagues. We need to fight back against the misinformation that the Bush administration is putting out.

    John Roberts has little experience as a judge—he was only appointed in 2003. But he's got a lot of experience as a corporate lobbyist and lawyer, consistently favoring wealthy corporations over regular Americans.

    Here's a list of some of the things that make Roberts the wrong pick for the Supreme Court:

    Wrong on environmental protection: Roberts appears to want to limit the scope of the Endangered Species Act, and in papers he wrote while in law school he supported far-right legal theories about "takings" which would make it almost impossible for the government to enforce most environmental legislation.

    Wrong on civil rights: Roberts worked to keep Congress from defending parts of the Voting Rights Act.

    Wrong on human rights: As a appeals court judge, Roberts ruled that the Geneva Convention doesn't apply to some prisoners of war.

    Wrong on our right to religious freedom: Roberts argued that schools should be able to impose religious speech on attendees.

    Wrong on women's rights: Roberts wrote that "Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overruled." He also weighed in on behalf of Operation Rescue, a violent anti-abortion group, in a federal case.

    President Bush could have chosen many fair-minded and independent jurists to replace Sandra Day O'Connor. Instead, he chose a corporate partisan loved by Bush's right-wing base but out of step with the rest of the country.

    Tell your senators they need to stop John Roberts now, at:

    http://political.moveon.org/roberts/?id=

    We'll be in touch soon about next steps. For now, please help us gather as many voices as possible to keep the Supreme Court fair. And thanks for everything you're doing.

    Sincerely,

    –Ben, Tanya, Justin, Jennifer and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team Wednesday, July 20th, 2005

    PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
     
  2. bock2911
    Offline

    bock2911 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    32
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    How is it looney for them to state they don't like his politcal views? I actually agree with a lot they say, which is help up by what the man has done. I am a little worried by what the man has said and done.
     

Share This Page