Elizabeth Edwards breaks silence on affair

[jillian]

I notice that nobody on the left can debate the actual subject.
Instead, they want to invoke past wrongs committed by somebody else.
Yeah, that makes it all ok.

what's to debate? he and his wife have major issues.

i don't care about people's affairs. never did. i didn't care about daddy bush's gf, and from an historical perspective, i don't care about kennedy's mistresses or eisenhower's aide de camp... or whether or not hillary had girlfriends.

Re-read post #1, here it is for you,

I keep looking, but I can't seem to find the 20+ threads on Edwards. Only a bunch of nonsense about Palin's kid. I don't recall the latter making a bid for public office.

The point is about how the left attacks, attacks and attacks again if somebody is on the right side.
Nice try at deflection though.
Fail.

I read the post. it was gunny feeling curmudgeonly.

and have you see me posting about palin's kid? i figure the poor girl has enough problems.

 

[Shadow]

Cue the lefty spin machine , that is, unless they stay clear of this or course .........

Well Clinton cheated on his wife (yeah, to me a bj is sex) and they still loved him so I don't know why they'd abandon Edwards. Remember, her cancer was in remission so it's not like he's a total scumbag...

yeah, hell, it's not like he served divorce papers on his wife while she was in the hospital after a mastectomy like newt gingrich did.

you know, that whole morality thing the rabid right prides itself on.

You mean the same morality you moonbats preach under the guise of "we must lead by moral example so the world won't hate us anymore"?. You dipshits speak out of both faces.

 

[jillian]

Well Clinton cheated on his wife (yeah, to me a bj is sex) and they still loved him so I don't know why they'd abandon Edwards. Remember, her cancer was in remission so it's not like he's a total scumbag...

yeah, hell, it's not like he served divorce papers on his wife while she was in the hospital after a mastectomy like newt gingrich did.

you know, that whole morality thing the rabid right prides itself on.

You mean the same morality you moonbats preach under the guise of "we must lead by moral example so the world won't hate us anymore"?. You dipshits speak out of both faces.

yeah, standing up against the "homosexual agenda" is soooooooooooo the same as being against torture.


oh, btw, if you had actually read my posts.... you know, instead of being a rightwingnut freak, you'd know that I don't think the terrorists are going to like us either way.

 

[alan1]

what's to debate? he and his wife have major issues.

i don't care about people's affairs. never did. i didn't care about daddy bush's gf, and from an historical perspective, i don't care about kennedy's mistresses or eisenhower's aide de camp... or whether or not hillary had girlfriends.

Re-read post #1, here it is for you,

I keep looking, but I can't seem to find the 20+ threads on Edwards. Only a bunch of nonsense about Palin's kid. I don't recall the latter making a bid for public office.

The point is about how the left attacks, attacks and attacks again if somebody is on the right side.
Nice try at deflection though.
Fail.

I read the post. it was gunny feeling curmudgeonly.

and have you see me posting about palin's kid? i figure the poor girl has enough problems.

And I never accused you of doing that.
the fact that you took it personally is all on you, not me.
I fear the lady doth protest to loudly.

 

[jillian]

Re-read post #1, here it is for you,

The point is about how the left attacks, attacks and attacks again if somebody is on the right side.
Nice try at deflection though.
Fail.

I read the post. it was gunny feeling curmudgeonly.

and have you see me posting about palin's kid? i figure the poor girl has enough problems.

And I never accused you of doing that.
the fact that you took it personally is all on you, not me.
I fear the lady doth protest to loudly.

nope, amigo... just clarifying.

 

[alan1]

I read the post. it was gunny feeling curmudgeonly.

and have you see me posting about palin's kid? i figure the poor girl has enough problems.

And I never accused you of doing that.
the fact that you took it personally is all on you, not me.
I fear the lady doth protest to loudly.

nope, amigo... just clarifying.

Want to pick anymore fights?

 

[Gunny]

Yet another ad hominem. I'm going for a run. Maybe one of you peanutheads can actually address the question, but I doubt you will.

You'd do well going back to me pretending not to remember you're here by staying out of my crosshairs.

"Ad hominems" aren't just broad personal attacks; an argumentum ad hominem consists of attacking an irrelevant characteristic of an opponent so as to circumvent response to the opposing argument. So if I'd said, "How typical of a Texan," that would have been an ad hominem. What I said wasn't.

Sure thing, junior.

"An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person", "argument against the person") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the source making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim."

Try again. I am the source of the question I asked, and rather than address that question, you attacked me.

Guess you'll never learn.

 

[manu1959]

Cue the lefty spin machine , that is, unless they stay clear of this or course .........

Well Clinton cheated on his wife (yeah, to me a bj is sex) and they still loved him so I don't know why they'd abandon Edwards. Remember, her cancer was in remission so it's not like he's a total scumbag...

yeah, hell, it's not like he served divorce papers on his wife while she was in the hospital after a mastectomy like newt gingrich did.

you know, that whole morality thing the rabid right prides itself on.

gee that makes edwards such a stand up guy........once again justifying bad behaviour with bad behaviour....i thought the left was better than the right......i thought you said you didn't care about peoples personal lives.....

 

[Gunny]

(CNN) -- Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of two-time presidential hopeful John Edwards, does not know whether he fathered a child during his affair with a campaign staffer, she says in an interview that is to air this week.
Elizabeth Edwards says she believes that her husband has had no other affairs.

"I have seen a picture of the baby. I have no idea. It doesn't look like my children, but I don't have any idea," she said in an exclusive interview with Oprah Winfrey to air Thursday.

Winfrey's Harpo Productions Inc. provided CNN with several preview clips.

John Edwards admitted in August that he had had an affair with Rielle Hunter, then 42. Hunter was hired to make a movie about Edwards, then making his second try for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The former senator has denied that Hunter's baby is his.

more ... Elizabeth Edwards breaks silence on affair - CNN.com

I keep looking, but I can't seem to find the 20+ threads on Edwards. Only a bunch of nonsense about Palin's kid. I don't recall the latter making a bid for public office.

you must have missed it under the 200 "obama is ruining the country" threads. or maybe they're under all the racist threads that were posted.

and if this thread weren't so silly, i might have said i feel really bad for her.

but the thread wasn't intended for real discussion now, was it?

didn't think so.

The thread was intended for serious discussion. I called your ass on the carpet and all you're doing is sputtering your ass off with that lame attempt to deflect. The topic is not Obama.

Produce 200 threads that state that. I'll wait.

The truth is, you lefties will question the ethics and morals of a Republican for the behavior of her child, but you won't question the ethics and morals of a Democrat for his own behavior.

But if Palin's daughter wanted an abortion and Palin said no you'd be all over ass about that and demanding her daughter have the right to choose. Apparently, Palin is only responsible in a cherrypicking sort of way.

The FACT is, not ONE person has or will address the question. This -- deflections and personal attacks -- represents itself as the best y'all can do. You have no real point. Just mindless Republican bashing for the sake of it. Win at all costs. The dishonor and selling of one's integrity doesn't matter.

Just so long as you get YOUR boy in the White House.

Defend the behavior and the double standard or get your owned ass back in the corner.

 

[del]

I notice that nobody on the left can debate the actual subject.
Instead, they want to invoke past wrongs committed by somebody else.
Yeah, that makes it all ok.

what's to debate? he and his wife have major issues.

i don't care about people's affairs. never did. i didn't care about daddy bush's gf, and from an historical perspective, i don't care about kennedy's mistresses or eisenhower's aide de camp... or whether or not hillary had girlfriends.

i hope hillary did hotter women than bill did......

almost impossible not to.......

 

[manu1959]

what's to debate? he and his wife have major issues.

i don't care about people's affairs. never did. i didn't care about daddy bush's gf, and from an historical perspective, i don't care about kennedy's mistresses or eisenhower's aide de camp... or whether or not hillary had girlfriends.

i hope hillary did hotter women than bill did......

almost impossible not to.......

wasn't she doing her aide de camp during the election

 

[Burp]

Being unfaithful to your spouse is unacceptable. It goes to honesty, morality, and class. When you said "I do," that was that. Forsake all others. End of conversation.

It doesn't matter what religion, race, political party, illness, amount of alcohol, etc.

You don't do it.

 

[manu1959]

Being unfaithful to your spouse is unacceptable. It goes to honesty, morality, and class. When you said "I do," that was that. Forsake all others. End of conversation.

It doesn't matter what religion, race, political party, illness, amount of alcohol, etc.

You don't do it.

what if you spouse wants to have a threesome.....

 

[Burp]

Being unfaithful to your spouse is unacceptable. It goes to honesty, morality, and class. When you said "I do," that was that. Forsake all others. End of conversation.

It doesn't matter what religion, race, political party, illness, amount of alcohol, etc.

You don't do it.

what if you spouse wants to have a threesome.....

If you are serious, well, then that is up to them. Simply not my thing.

If you are kidding, well, I'll run the video camera.

 

[Shadow]

yeah, hell, it's not like he served divorce papers on his wife while she was in the hospital after a mastectomy like newt gingrich did.

you know, that whole morality thing the rabid right prides itself on.

You mean the same morality you moonbats preach under the guise of "we must lead by moral example so the world won't hate us anymore"?. You dipshits speak out of both faces.

yeah, standing up against the "homosexual agenda" is soooooooooooo the same as being against torture.


oh, btw, if you had actually read my posts.... you know, instead of being a rightwingnut freak, you'd know that I don't think the terrorists are going to like us either way.

Ummmm you moonbats preach about your "moral" superiority every chance you get. Not "just" against torture either, but related to everything under the sun. That is unless one of you lefties gets caught with your pants down,then it's deflect, deflect, deflect, blame someone else,deflect some more.

Is John Edwards now a homosexual? Interesting.

 

[Sinatra]

Being unfaithful to your spouse is unacceptable. It goes to honesty, morality, and class. When you said "I do," that was that. Forsake all others. End of conversation.

It doesn't matter what religion, race, political party, illness, amount of alcohol, etc.

You don't do it.

what if you spouse wants to have a threesome.....

Best post of the day right there.

 

[Dr Grump]

The truth is, you lefties will question the ethics and morals of a Republican for the behavior of her child, but you won't question the ethics and morals of a Democrat for his own behavior.

Because when it comes down to it, most lefties don't give a shit about affairs of the heart and all that other shit, Repubs do. And they are the ones who makes an issue of it. Show me a Dem who gave a shit about Lewinsky. Nada. The only time a Dem gives a shit is when a rightwing loon screams their nuts off about how immoral an affair is, is when one of their own does the same, thus showing them for the hypocrites they are....

 

[Dr Grump]

Ummmm you moonbats preach about your "moral" superiority every chance you get. Not "just" against torture either, but related to everything under the sun. That is unless one of you lefties gets caught with your pants down,then it's deflect, deflect, deflect, blame someone else,deflect some more.

Is John Edwards now a homosexual? Interesting.

Absolute bollocks. You will never find a leftie ranting on about morals in terms of personal choice that is nobody else's business. They will get stuff in when it affects others such as torture. Get your facts right Dittohead....

 

[Gunny]

The truth is, you lefties will question the ethics and morals of a Republican for the behavior of her child, but you won't question the ethics and morals of a Democrat for his own behavior.

Because when it comes down to it, most lefties don't give a shit about affairs of the heart and all that other shit, Repubs do. And they are the ones who makes an issue of it. Show me a Dem who gave a shit about Lewinsky. Nada. The only time a Dem gives a shit is when a rightwing loon screams their nuts off about how immoral an affair is, is when one of their own does the same, thus showing them for the hypocrites they are....

That's a bunch of crap, and doesn't explain the hypocrisy one bit. What they don't care about is whose or what lives they destroy attempting to villify anyone that doesn't agree with their views.

You're attempt at a taking the argument 180 won't work. The whole point to this thread is that the right couldn't even hope to keep up in the character assassination department because only the loons on the right engage in such behavior while it's standard practice for ALL (with the usual exceptions) leftwingers.

 

[Shadow]

Ummmm you moonbats preach about your "moral" superiority every chance you get. Not "just" against torture either, but related to everything under the sun. That is unless one of you lefties gets caught with your pants down,then it's deflect, deflect, deflect, blame someone else,deflect some more.

Is John Edwards now a homosexual? Interesting.

Absolute bollocks. You will never find a leftie ranting on about morals in terms of personal choice that is nobody else's business. They will get stuff in when it affects others such as torture. Get your facts right Dittohead....

Lefties preach morals constantly,out of one side of their face that is.

Things Lefties get all "moral" about when it's convienient..

Civil Rights...even if they have to lie about their past in this area to do it.

The "poor"...even if they don't donate as much to the poor as Republicans or religious groups.

Abortion...even though they have no problem throwing a downs baby in a basement to die a slow death without medical care if it managed to survive the procedure.

The War..even though they only defend the terrorists and spit on our soldiers.

Gay rights...as long as you are a democrat. If not ,you are called a homo,fag or whatever non pc name they can pull out of their ass at the time.

Sexism...unless you are a republican, then you are a herpes infested whore who deserves to be raped by porn stars.

Hell what don't they preach their sanctimonious "morality" sermons over?