Eleven States To Jail Feds Who Violate The 2nd Amendment

[Cecilie1200]

BTW folks - to forcibly impede a federal agent in the exercise of his duties - is a crime, punishable by up to 20 years.

18 USC § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees | Title 18 - Crimes and Criminal Procedure | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute

I sincerely hope as many Texan dufuses as possible try this, and I'll enjoy watching them rounded up and sent to prison.

Well, I hope it's a clean and decisive civil war, so that we don't have to keep arguing the issues for years afterward.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

BTW folks - to forcibly impede a federal agent in the exercise of his duties - is a crime, punishable by up to 20 years.

18 USC § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees | Title 18 - Crimes and Criminal Procedure | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute

I sincerely hope as many Texan dufuses as possible try this, and I'll enjoy watching them rounded up and sent to prison.

States' Rights scare you, don't they?

Um, no…

What’s frightening is those so ignorant of the Constitution and its case law (in many cases willfully), that they actually believe states have the ‘right’ to ignore or nullify Federal statues, particularly when that was never the original intent of the Framers of the Founding Document.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Eleven States To Jail Feds Who Violate The 2nd Amendment

Eleven states and one OP ignorant of the Constitution and its case law.

And millions of tone-deaf leftists who think they can make people sit down, shut up, and accept slavery quietly simply because they say it's "the law".

Like I said, I hope it's a clean, decisive civil war.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
What’s frightening is those so ignorant of the Constitution and its case law (in many cases willfully), that they actually believe states have the ‘right’ to ignore or nullify Federal statues, particularly when that was never the original intent of the Framers of the Founding Document.

Case law? HAHAHA. Yeah i love the way the Supreme Court granted itself the power to create laws (in violation of the constitution) and then says it's case law and you may not challenge it!!!

You loony libs will have to do better than that.

BTW - the principle behind case law was voided in bush v gore 2000.

 

[Cecilie1200]

BTW folks - to forcibly impede a federal agent in the exercise of his duties - is a crime, punishable by up to 20 years.

18 USC § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees | Title 18 - Crimes and Criminal Procedure | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute

I sincerely hope as many Texan dufuses as possible try this, and I'll enjoy watching them rounded up and sent to prison.

States' Rights scare you, don't they?

As far as I can tell, citizens' rights scare a lot of people these days. Most especially, for some odd reason, their own.

 

[Mustang]

This is music to the ears of all patriots. The second and tenth amendments make it very clear the feds have no authority in gun control. IT'S A STATE ISSUE!!

Eleven States To Jail Feds Who Violate The 2nd Amendment | _

Posted on January 18, 2013
Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Tennesee, Oklahoma, North Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona and Wyoming have proposed legislation to jail federal officials who violate the second amendment.

The 2nd Amendment Preservation Act is a state-level bill that renders all federal gun laws, regulations, rules, acts, orders, etc – null and void within the borders of the state.

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

It seems as if conservatives just won't be happy until there's an armed confrontation between one or more of the states and the federal gov't.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This is music to the ears of all patriots. The second and tenth amendments make it very clear the feds have no authority in gun control. IT'S A STATE ISSUE!!

Eleven States To Jail Feds Who Violate The 2nd Amendment | _

Posted on January 18, 2013
Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Tennesee, Oklahoma, North Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona and Wyoming have proposed legislation to jail federal officials who violate the second amendment.

The 2nd Amendment Preservation Act is a state-level bill that renders all federal gun laws, regulations, rules, acts, orders, etc – null and void within the borders of the state.

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

It seems as if conservatives just won't be happy until there's an armed confrontation between one or more of the states and the federal gov't.

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

 

[Mustang]

This is music to the ears of all patriots. The second and tenth amendments make it very clear the feds have no authority in gun control. IT'S A STATE ISSUE!!

It seems as if conservatives just won't be happy until there's an armed confrontation between one or more of the states and the federal gov't.

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

Conservatives used to look back nostalgically at the 1950's. Nowadays I think they would prefer the antebellum South of the 1850's.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

Incorrect.

As already correctly noted in other threads on the same topic, the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate commerce that effects the economy of the Nation as a whole, even if that commerce is intrastate only. See: Wickard v. Filburn (1942), Gonzales v. Raich (2005).

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

As already correctly noted in other threads on the same topic, the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate commerce that effects the economy of the Nation as a whole, even if that commerce is intrastate only. See: Wickard v. Filburn (1942), Gonzales v. Raich (2005).

By that interpretation, the feds can do anything and that's why it's wrong. Commerce Clause gives congress power to regulate commerce on the extent such regulation is consistent with the listed powers of congress in article 1 section 8. READ

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

When america got started the the 13 colonies were independent countries. That's what the founding fathers wanted. A loose confederation of 13 countries. Something like the EU is now. THINK

 

[ogibillm]

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

When america got started the the 13 colonies were independent countries. That's what the founding fathers wanted. A loose confederation of 13 countries. Something like the EU is now. THINK

you failed history class too - or perhaps you never heard of the articles of confederation

 

[Mustang]

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

When america got started the the 13 colonies were independent countries. That's what the founding fathers wanted. A loose confederation of 13 countries. Something like the EU is now. THINK

you failed history class too - or perhaps you never heard of the articles of confederation

School is for elitist snobs.

 

[Cecilie1200]

This is music to the ears of all patriots. The second and tenth amendments make it very clear the feds have no authority in gun control. IT'S A STATE ISSUE!!

Eleven States To Jail Feds Who Violate The 2nd Amendment | _

Posted on January 18, 2013
Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Tennesee, Oklahoma, North Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona and Wyoming have proposed legislation to jail federal officials who violate the second amendment.

The 2nd Amendment Preservation Act is a state-level bill that renders all federal gun laws, regulations, rules, acts, orders, etc – null and void within the borders of the state.

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

It seems as if conservatives just won't be happy until there's an armed confrontation between one or more of the states and the federal gov't.

Really? Because it seems to US that rights-trampling, tone-deaf leftists just won't be happy until they've pushed their remaking of the United States so far that there's an armed confrontation between their elitist, "progressive" asses and the people who are sick and tired of the attempts to enslave us.

Honestly, did it ever occur to you delusional dickwads that there's never been a peaceful, bloodless political coup in history for a GOOD REASON? Take some of that tax money you're stealing from our grandchildren and buy a clue.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

Incorrect.

As already correctly noted in other threads on the same topic, the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate commerce that effects the economy of the Nation as a whole, even if that commerce is intrastate only. See: Wickard v. Filburn (1942), Gonzales v. Raich (2005).

In other words, the so-called "Commerce Clause" authorizes no such fucking thing, since notably IT is not cited anywhere in your references. The Supreme Court, after illegally allocating to itself the ability to make laws, authorizes Congress to regulate commerce that's none of its fucking business, which is the same as you saying, "Your attempts to resist our enslavement of you is invalid because we say so!" Duhhh, shitforbrains. Would we be HAVING this argument about people reclaiming their Constitutional rights from the tyrannical left if the left wasn't tyrannically taking away rights by ignoring the written Constitution?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

When america got started the the 13 colonies were independent countries. That's what the founding fathers wanted. A loose confederation of 13 countries. Something like the EU is now. THINK

That would require the left to give a fat rat's ass WHAT the Founding Fathers wanted and intended, and they don't even give a fat rat's ass what their neighbors and fellow citizens right now want. Please note the extensive attempts to invalidate and dismiss the Founding Fathers as not having been up to the "high moral standards" of modern-day leftists.



Sorry. I simply can't talk about "leftist moral standards" without laughing myself into a hernia.

 

[regent]

It seems the second amendment has been incorporated.

 

[Missourian]

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

Incorrect.

As already correctly noted in other threads on the same topic, the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate commerce that effects the economy of the Nation as a whole, even if that commerce is intrastate only. See: Wickard v. Filburn (1942), Gonzales v. Raich (2005).

Read Wickard v. Filburn and Gonzales v. Raich and tell me this is good law.

 

[regent]

Or the Republic is destroyed and replaced with 50 independent countries.

Either fantasy is pathetic idiocy.

When america got started the the 13 colonies were independent countries. That's what the founding fathers wanted. A loose confederation of 13 countries. Something like the EU is now. THINK

That would require the left to give a fat rat's ass WHAT the Founding Fathers wanted and intended, and they don't even give a fat rat's ass what their neighbors and fellow citizens right now want. Please note the extensive attempts to invalidate and dismiss the Founding Fathers as not having been up to the "high moral standards" of modern-day leftists.



Sorry. I simply can't talk about "leftist moral standards" without laughing myself into a hernia.

"For the framers of the Constitution were the most liberal thinkers of all the ages and the charter they produced out of the liberal revolution of their time has never been and is not now surpassed in liberal thought."
General Douglas MacArthur

 

[JakeStarkey]

This is music to the ears of all patriots. The second and tenth amendments make it very clear the feds have no authority in gun control. IT'S A STATE ISSUE!!

Eleven States To Jail Feds Who Violate The 2nd Amendment | _

Posted on January 18, 2013
Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Tennesee, Oklahoma, North Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona and Wyoming have proposed legislation to jail federal officials who violate the second amendment.

The 2nd Amendment Preservation Act is a state-level bill that renders all federal gun laws, regulations, rules, acts, orders, etc – null and void within the borders of the state.

The Firearms Freedom Act declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the commerce clause, with firearms as the object.

Any state officers who interfere with federal officers will end up face down, period.