Egyptian Journalist Describes 'Absolute Prosperity' in Gaza

[docmauser1]

"In March, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of the prospective U.N. action as a 'tsunami.' The fear is that the world will condemn Israel not only for violating international law but also for carrying out its criminal acts in an occupied state recognized by the U.N."

How so, if the International Court of Justice ruled:
A.) The ICJ ruled that, it had jurisdiction over the case, but it involved only a dispute between Israel and the UN, rather than a dispute between Israel and palistains.
B.) The ICJ ruled that, provisions of the international law regarding israeli right of self-defense are inapplicable, since there is no state involved other than Israel.
C.) The ICJ ruled that the West Bank is an occupied territory.
D.) Thus, the ICJ holds that, there exists an armed conflict, and that territories are occupied territories of another state; and at the same time the ICJ asserts that, Israel has no right to defend itself, because there is no other state involved.
The UN should stick to "recognizing" pot and have a peace joint, of course.

 

[docmauser1]

The right of self determination gives people the right to set up a government. It is not required that they do so.

Good, we knew all along the alleged "state of palestine" has, of course, never existed.

For John Quigley Palestine's existence as a state predates the 1988 declaration. Tracing Palestine's status as an international entity back to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, he recalls that the Palestine Mandate (1918–1948), an arrangement made under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, held as its "ultimate objective", the "self-determination and independence of the people concerned." He says that in explicitly referring to the Covenant, the 1988 declaration was reaffirming an existing Palestinian statehood.[126] Noting that Palestine under the Mandate entered into bilateral treaties, including one with Great Britain, the Mandatory power, he cites this as an example of its "sovereignty" at that time. He also notes the corollary of the Stimson Doctrine and the customary prohibition on the use of force contained in the Restatement of Foreign Relations Law of the United States, "[a]n entity does not necessarily cease to be a state even if all of its territory has been occupied by a foreign power".

Cool, so, who was that sheikh, emir, sultan, imam, president, prime-minister of that newly created "state of palestine"?

 

[georgephillip]

Let's don't. He's a lying piece of shit. No wonder you suck his ass.

No problem.
Let's ask Ehud!

"In March, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of the prospective U.N. action as a 'tsunami.' The fear is that the world will condemn Israel not only for violating international law but also for carrying out its criminal acts in an occupied state recognized by the U.N."

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

The Arab Spring has Sprung, Dung-tongue.

In February 2006, the U.S. and Israel imposed a siege in Gaza after the "wrong side" – Hamas – won elections in Palestine, recognized as free and fair. The siege became much harsher in June 2007 after the failure of a U.S.-backed military coup to overthrow the elected government.

It is interesting that he would say that.

The liars tell us that it was Hamas that had the coup. How can they actually think that people would believe that a sitting, elected government would have a "coup" and "violently take over? Ah, but they do.

What else could they be lying about? That Abbas is the president of Palestine. Or that Fayyad is the prime minister. Or that Israel has the right to exist.

The rich depend on lies the same way human beings depend on oxygen.
Both dependencies become critical in times of existential crisis.
What are rich Israeli Jews worrying about these days...?

Noam knows!

"The business leaders' particular concern was the U.N. General Assembly session this September, where the Palestinian Authority is planning to call for recognition of a Palestinian state.

Dan Gillerman, Israel's former ambassador to the United Nations, warned participants that 'the morning after the anticipated announcement of recognition of a Palestinian state, a painful and dramatic process of Southafricanization will begin' – meaning that Israel would become a pariah state, subject to international sanctions."

In 1948 a "Jewish State" was imposed by force of arms on a population that was two-thirds non-Jew.

That particular historical evil is about to be revisited.

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

Surf's UP, Drivel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

No problem.
Let's ask Ehud!

"In March, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of the prospective U.N. action as a 'tsunami.' The fear is that the world will condemn Israel not only for violating international law but also for carrying out its criminal acts in an occupied state recognized by the U.N."

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

The Arab Spring has Sprung, Dung-tongue.

In February 2006, the U.S. and Israel imposed a siege in Gaza after the "wrong side" – Hamas – won elections in Palestine, recognized as free and fair. The siege became much harsher in June 2007 after the failure of a U.S.-backed military coup to overthrow the elected government.

It is interesting that he would say that.

The liars tell us that it was Hamas that had the coup. How can they actually think that people would believe that a sitting, elected government would have a "coup" and "violently take over? Ah, but they do.

What else could they be lying about? That Abbas is the president of Palestine. Or that Fayyad is the prime minister. Or that Israel has the right to exist.

The rich depend on lies the same way human beings depend on oxygen.
Both dependencies become critical in times of existential crisis.
What are rich Israeli Jews worrying about these days...?

Noam knows!

"The business leaders' particular concern was the U.N. General Assembly session this September, where the Palestinian Authority is planning to call for recognition of a Palestinian state.

Dan Gillerman, Israel's former ambassador to the United Nations, warned participants that 'the morning after the anticipated announcement of recognition of a Palestinian state, a painful and dramatic process of Southafricanization will begin' – meaning that Israel would become a pariah state, subject to international sanctions."

In 1948 a "Jewish State" was imposed by force of arms on a population that was two-thirds non-Jew.

That particular historical evil is about to be revisited.

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

Surf's UP, Drivel.

In 1948 a "Jewish State" was imposed by force of arms on a population that was two-thirds non-Jew.

That is historic fact.

Then there is a legal fact. It is inadmissible to acquire land through the threat or use of force.

That may be why that to this day Israel does not have one square inch of land it can put a border around.

 

[georgephillip]

George is chomping at the bit to read about deaths.

Any deaths though really.

How many Arab deaths has Israel been responsible for since 1948?
How much money have those dead Arabs produced for Bibi?
How much have you earned from Israeli war crimes?
Ready for payback?

 

[docmauser1]

How many Arab deaths has Israel been responsible for since 1948?How much money have those dead Arabs produced for Bibi?How much have you earned from Israeli war crimes?Ready for payback?

Are potomats operational in California?

 

[georgephillip]

It is interesting that he would say that.

The liars tell us that it was Hamas that had the coup. How can they actually think that people would believe that a sitting, elected government would have a "coup" and "violently take over? Ah, but they do.

What else could they be lying about? That Abbas is the president of Palestine. Or that Fayyad is the prime minister. Or that Israel has the right to exist.

The rich depend on lies the same way human beings depend on oxygen.
Both dependencies become critical in times of existential crisis.
What are rich Israeli Jews worrying about these days...?

Noam knows!

"The business leaders' particular concern was the U.N. General Assembly session this September, where the Palestinian Authority is planning to call for recognition of a Palestinian state.

Dan Gillerman, Israel's former ambassador to the United Nations, warned participants that 'the morning after the anticipated announcement of recognition of a Palestinian state, a painful and dramatic process of Southafricanization will begin' – meaning that Israel would become a pariah state, subject to international sanctions."

In 1948 a "Jewish State" was imposed by force of arms on a population that was two-thirds non-Jew.

That particular historical evil is about to be revisited.

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

Surf's UP, Drivel.

In 1948 a "Jewish State" was imposed by force of arms on a population that was two-thirds non-Jew.

That is historic fact.

Then there is a legal fact. It is inadmissible to acquire land through the threat or use of force.

That may be why that to this day Israel does not have one square inch of land it can put a border around.

Israel as a Jewish state doesn't exist without the support of US corporate elites and their Republican AND Democratic handmaidens. The relationship isn't all that different from the corruption that propped up successive US puppets in South Vietnam. When the cost of occupying South Vietnam became unbearable to US elites, they spun on a dime and tossed their allies from the last helicopter leaving Saigon.

It could be happening again in Israel with one BIG difference:

200+ nuclear weapons with some sick religious fundamentalist fingers close to some of the triggers.

 

[georgephillip]

How many Arab deaths has Israel been responsible for since 1948?How much money have those dead Arabs produced for Bibi?How much have you earned from Israeli war crimes?Ready for payback?

Are potomats operational in California?

Not sure.
Why??

potomat on Scribd | Scribd

 

[georgephillip]

"In March, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of the prospective U.N. action as a 'tsunami.' The fear is that the world will condemn Israel not only for violating international law but also for carrying out its criminal acts in an occupied state recognized by the U.N."

How so, if the International Court of Justice ruled:
A.) The ICJ ruled that, it had jurisdiction over the case, but it involved only a dispute between Israel and the UN, rather than a dispute between Israel and palistains.
B.) The ICJ ruled that, provisions of the international law regarding israeli right of self-defense are inapplicable, since there is no state involved other than Israel.
C.) The ICJ ruled that the West Bank is an occupied territory.
D.) Thus, the ICJ holds that, there exists an armed conflict, and that territories are occupied territories of another state; and at the same time the ICJ asserts that, Israel has no right to defend itself, because there is no other state involved.
The UN should stick to "recognizing" pot and have a peace joint, of course.

Israel has the same "right" to defend its illegal occupation of the State of Palestine that a burglar has when police catch him looting another citizen's home.

'Think there will be any Kosher herb in Jerusalem this coming September?
Any mushrooms?

 

[daveman]

The 1948 war was called the war that wasn't. Lebanon retrieved two villages that were occupied by Israel. That was about it for the northern front. Syria did virtually nothing. Jordan, Iraq troops were under Jordanian command, was commanded by British officers, Jordan was promised $3M a year for five years and the West Bank if it did not attack Israel. It did not. Egypt managed to hold Gaza from Israeli attacks.

The war was called by UN Security Council resolution. Nobody won that war. Nobody lost that war. No land changed hands in that war.

Poor terrorists. All they want to do is kill Jews. Is that so bad?

Not according to fucking idiots like Tinhead.

Standard Israeli propaganda states that the new state of Israel was attacked by five Arab countries and they lost. So Israel won land.

UN resolution 181 gave no land to Israel. Israel won no land in the 1948 war.

I agree, if by "Standard Israeli propaganda" you mean "reality".

 

[daveman]

Let's Ask Chomsky!

Let's don't. He's a lying piece of shit. No wonder you suck his ass.

No problem.
Let's ask Ehud!

"In March, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of the prospective U.N. action as a 'tsunami.' The fear is that the world will condemn Israel not only for violating international law but also for carrying out its criminal acts in an occupied state recognized by the U.N."

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning | Truthout

The Arab Spring has Sprung, Dung-tongue.

In Israel, a Tsunami Warning
Thursday 7 July 2011
by: Noam Chomsky, Truthout | Op-Ed​

Immediately dismissed as leftist Jew-hating horseshit.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Poor terrorists. All they want to do is kill Jews. Is that so bad?

Not according to fucking idiots like Tinhead.

Standard Israeli propaganda states that the new state of Israel was attacked by five Arab countries and they lost. So Israel won land.

UN resolution 181 gave no land to Israel. Israel won no land in the 1948 war.

I agree, if by "Standard Israeli propaganda" you mean "reality".

That standard line is not true.

How can you call that reality?

 

[daveman]

George is chomping at the bit to read about deaths.

Any deaths though really.

How many Arab deaths has Israel been responsible for since 1948?
How much money have those dead Arabs produced for Bibi?
How much have you earned from Israeli war crimes?
Ready for payback?

Six million wasn't enough for George, either.

Why do you hate Jews, George? Do you blame them for your failures in life?

 

[daveman]

Standard Israeli propaganda states that the new state of Israel was attacked by five Arab countries and they lost. So Israel won land.

UN resolution 181 gave no land to Israel. Israel won no land in the 1948 war.

I agree, if by "Standard Israeli propaganda" you mean "reality".

That standard line is not true.

How can you call that reality?

What you call "truth" is in fact a lie. THAT'S reality.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I agree, if by "Standard Israeli propaganda" you mean "reality".

That standard line is not true.

How can you call that reality?

What you call "truth" is in fact a lie. THAT'S reality.

What I stated is historical fact.

Can you post something that proves me wrong?

 

[daveman]

That standard line is not true.

How can you call that reality?

What you call "truth" is in fact a lie. THAT'S reality.

What I stated is historical fact.

Can you post something that proves me wrong?

Yes. However, I could post nothing that would convince you.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What you call "truth" is in fact a lie. THAT'S reality.

What I stated is historical fact.

Can you post something that proves me wrong?

Yes. However, I could post nothing that would convince you.

Surely if Israel had acquired any land defined by borders that info should be easy to find.

Documents, maps, something.

 

[docmauser1]

"In March, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of the prospective U.N. action as a 'tsunami.' The fear is that the world will condemn Israel not only for violating international law but also for carrying out its criminal acts in an occupied state recognized by the U.N."

How so, if the International Court of Justice ruled:
A.) The ICJ ruled that, it had jurisdiction over the case, but it involved only a dispute between Israel and the UN, rather than a dispute between Israel and palistains.
B.) The ICJ ruled that, provisions of the international law regarding israeli right of self-defense are inapplicable, since there is no state involved other than Israel.
C.) The ICJ ruled that the West Bank is an occupied territory.
D.) Thus, the ICJ holds that, there exists an armed conflict, and that territories are occupied territories of another state; and at the same time the ICJ asserts that, Israel has no right to defend itself, because there is no other state involved.
The UN should stick to "recognizing" pot and have a peace joint, of course.

Israel has the same "right" to defend its illegal occupation of the State of Palestine that a burglar has when police catch him looting another citizen's home.

We are not interested in delusions, occupying the disturbed mind of the arab "street".

 

[daveman]

What I stated is historical fact.

Can you post something that proves me wrong?

Yes. However, I could post nothing that would convince you.

Surely if Israel had acquired any land defined by borders that info should be easy to find.

Documents, maps, something.

Oh, undoubtedly. But as I said, I could post nothing that would convince you.

You refuse to accept anything that contradicts what terrorists have programmed you with.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Yes. However, I could post nothing that would convince you.

Surely if Israel had acquired any land defined by borders that info should be easy to find.

Documents, maps, something.

Oh, undoubtedly. But as I said, I could post nothing that would convince you.

You refuse to accept anything that contradicts what terrorists have programmed you with.

That's OK, I have asked many people to show where Israel obtained any land or borders and all I get is a song and dance.