Effects of a Supervolcanic Eruption

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,043
280
Earth
This is for the survivalist types who think planning for a Yellowstone or other supervolcano eruption is a good use of their time.

Super Volcano Will Challenge Civilization, Geologists Warn | LiveScience

""An area the size of North America can be devastated, and pronounced deterioration of global climate would be expected for a few years following the eruption," Self said. "They could result in the devastation of world agriculture, severe disruption of food supplies, and mass starvation. These effects could be sufficiently severe to threaten the fabric of civilization.
...
Geologists in the United States detailed a similar scenario in 2001, when they found evidence suggesting volcanic activity in Yellowstone National Park will eventually lead to a colossal eruption. Half the United States will be covered in ash up to 3 feet (1 meter) deep, according to a study published in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters.
Explosions of this magnitude "happen about every 600,000 years at Yellowstone," says Chuck Wicks of the U.S. Geological Survey, who has studied the possibilities in separate work. "And it's been about 620,000 years since the last super explosive eruption there."
...


Unlike other things, there's nothing to be done about an imminent volcanic eruption. Drilling a hole 'to relieve pressure' is simply creating a means for that pressure to escape explosively, thus creating the eruption you were trying to prevent.

Vesuvius in Italy is a current worry for regular explosive eruption (not supervolcano size.) In past eruptions a plug in the top of the cone formed trapped magma and pressure to build until a fault appeared setting it off. Since it's last major period of activity a new plug has formed and pressure is once again building up.

Yellowstone's supervolcano is also a growing concern showing many of the signs we attribute to an imminent eruption as with grown deformation (rising ground because of rising magma underneath,) and small earthquake 'swarms.' And given it's past eruption history, it's long overdo for a super-eruption.

It's natural to try and survive life-threatening events. But in some situations survival may not be the desired outcome as if the entire planet is under threat as it'd be after a supervolcanic eruption.

"But it's all right. I've planned ahead. We're just 2 miles from a primary target. A millisecond of blinding light, and we're vaporized. Much better than the millions who'd survive to wander sightless through the smoldering aftermath. We'll be spared the horror of survival." - "Wargames"
 
This is a pretty accurate depiction of a major Yellowstone eruption;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnvey1Hdpcg]Yellowstone Supervolcano (full movie) Science Docufiction - YouTube[/ame]
 
Of all the things that we can't do anything about the Yellowstone Caldera has got to be number one. Worse, probably, because so many people believe that volcanos are caused by global warming.
 
God bless the usgs and all the research they have done on super volcano's. Hopefully they're funded right to give us some warning!







Unless they can give us about a ten year warning there's not much you can do. When another one occurs (as it surely will) you had better hope that there is enough food stockpiled, and energy resources available (and wind and solar won't cut it) to maintain civilization for a period of three to five years.

It WILL be a world changing event.
 
When that caldera blows as it surely will one day survival supplies won't help as much of the United States won't exist to have survivors.
 
The last super volcano was Krakatoa in 1883. It was heard 3000 miles away and produced a two year volcanic winter. Yellowstone is said to be a larger caldera than that.
 
The last super volcano was Krakatoa in 1883. It was heard 3000 miles away and produced a two year volcanic winter. Yellowstone is said to be a larger caldera than that.







Krakatoa was far, far smaller than a super volcano. Estimates range from four to five cubic miles of material were blown into the atmosphere (St. Helens was a paltry .9 cu. mi.)
a super volcanic eruption on the other hand is truly epic.....Yellowstone erupted on the order of 600 cubic miles of material in a period of a week.
 
Krakatoa is still recognized as a supervolcano. It is far smaller than the Yellowstone caldera. For all the damage krakatoa did, the Yellowstone caldera would be many times larger. I dare say survival gear wouldn't do the average person in the area or even miles away, any good at all.
 
Krakatoa is still recognized as a supervolcano. It is far smaller than the Yellowstone caldera. For all the damage krakatoa did, the Yellowstone caldera would be many times larger. I dare say survival gear wouldn't do the average person in the area or even miles away, any good at all.







When Mammoth erupted 700,000 years ago life on the west coast....ended. And no, Krakatoa is not a super volcano.....not even close. It is classed as a Ultra-Plinian on the Volcanic Explosivity Index rating a 6 out of a possible of 8 on the scale. The scale is logarithmic, so a supervolcanic eruption is 1000 times larger than Krakatoa.
 
Toba was much worse than any of the Yellowstone eruptions. People tend to forget or not know that. Moreover, Yellowstone is not the one we have to worry about, since it is much less likely to erupt in a supervolcanic eruption in our lifetime than at least one other. That other volcano is Taupo, in New Zealand.

Taupo Volcano - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Also, within the Taupo volcanic zone is Mount Ruapehu, one of the most active volcanoes in the world, showing that this volcanic zone has a much higher potential for supervolcanic eruption than Yellowstone does.
 
Yep, Taupo is a fun one. One of its eruptions yielded a 1000 kilometer long ignimbrite flow. Most of which I have sampled.
 
The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory wishes to point out that there's nothing unusual or threatening about the current situation at Yellowstone.

USGS: Volcano Hazards Program - Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Featured Articles Archive

Right now sure. But ask yourself this, if a super eruption was imminent, why tell anyone? Can't do anything about it, evacuating doesn't do any good as people'd panic, and it's basically an extinction level event. You really expect them to tell us? I don't. And hope they wouldn't. Would have mass suicides, not the worst idea but still.
 
God bless the usgs and all the research they have done on super volcano's. Hopefully they're funded right to give us some warning!

Ya great, you're about to die and the world as we know it cease to exist. Just thought we'd mention it. Have a nice day. :)

I don't want any warning of incoming nukes, supervolcano eruptions, or hostile aliens blasting stuff. :)
 
The last super volcano was Krakatoa in 1883. It was heard 3000 miles away and produced a two year volcanic winter. Yellowstone is said to be a larger caldera than that.







Krakatoa was far, far smaller than a super volcano. Estimates range from four to five cubic miles of material were blown into the atmosphere (St. Helens was a paltry .9 cu. mi.)
a super volcanic eruption on the other hand is truly epic.....Yellowstone erupted on the order of 600 cubic miles of material in a period of a week.

Last super eruption, I think, was the Toba Event. You know, that thing that reduced the human population of Earth to such small numbers we almost went extinct?
 
If Yellowstone were about the blow, maybe maybe maybe placing as many nukes over it and setting it off would vaporize enough of the magma to provide some help. Make it survivable like. Magma chamber's just a big lava lake, vaporize it with a few thousand megatons and surely that'd help. Pretty much screwed anyway, worth a shot :)
 
The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory wishes to point out that there's nothing unusual or threatening about the current situation at Yellowstone.

USGS: Volcano Hazards Program - Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Featured Articles Archive

Right now sure. But ask yourself this, if a super eruption was imminent, why tell anyone? Can't do anything about it, evacuating doesn't do any good as people'd panic, and it's basically an extinction level event. You really expect them to tell us? I don't. And hope they wouldn't. Would have mass suicides, not the worst idea but still.






Supervolcano's take millions of years to regenerate (if in fact they ever do). Yellowstone and Mammoth are relatively safe. It's the ones that haven't erupted yet that are the worry.
 
The last super volcano was Krakatoa in 1883. It was heard 3000 miles away and produced a two year volcanic winter. Yellowstone is said to be a larger caldera than that.







Krakatoa was far, far smaller than a super volcano. Estimates range from four to five cubic miles of material were blown into the atmosphere (St. Helens was a paltry .9 cu. mi.)
a super volcanic eruption on the other hand is truly epic.....Yellowstone erupted on the order of 600 cubic miles of material in a period of a week.

Last super eruption, I think, was the Toba Event. You know, that thing that reduced the human population of Earth to such small numbers we almost went extinct?






74,000 years ago and maybe. The jury is still out on that theory.
 

Forum List

Back
Top