Education Dept. : BDS activity against Israel will be defined as anti-Semitism

OK, but none of the Palestinian advocacy groups in the US are affiliated with any so called "terrorist" groups. They are all non partisan. There is no there there.

True face of BDS
Shut-Down-AIPAC-Hezbollah-Flag-e1461158153846-620x435.png

assadnasrallahposter.jpg


Q. Wonder why BDS is targeting Jews while covering for the enemies of US?
 
European Parliament: Is BDS antisemitic?


Four Zionists on a panel. I could see where that was going. Each had a deck of anti Semite cards that they played regularly throughout the program.

No anti Semitism here.

The Case for Cultural & Academic Boycott of Israel with intro by Ken Loach

 
European Parliament: Is BDS antisemitic?


Four Zionists on a panel. I could see where that was going. Each had a deck of anti Semite cards that they played regularly throughout the program.

No anti Semitism here.

The Case for Cultural & Academic Boycott of Israel with intro by Ken Loach



Boycott Israel as a means to placate islamic terrorists?

That doesn't make sense.
 
European Parliament: Is BDS antisemitic?


Four Zionists on a panel. I could see where that was going. Each had a deck of anti Semite cards that they played regularly throughout the program.

No anti Semitism here.

The Case for Cultural & Academic Boycott of Israel with intro by Ken Loach



I don't understand, BDS role is to define antisemitism?

The law is very clear on the definition, and it's the same as in the US.
 
Because it is anti semitism. Nothing more, nothing less.

The new buzz words are Israel and Zionist.

So one doesn't need to use the term Jew.

Because that's what it really means, in the end.
 
Senior Hamas Official Fathi Hammad Promises to ‘Cleanse Palestine of the Filth of the Jews’
Fathi-Hammad-620x436.jpg


Senior Hamas official Fathi Hammad announced at a rally on July 12 that the terrorist group will “cleanse Palestine of the filth of the Jews” by 2022.

“We say, facing this challenge with courage and bravery: We are coming for you Netanyahu. We are coming for you Liberman,” he said. “We are coming to chop your heads off your necks. We are coming to chop off that entity and to destroy that army, which our prophet [Muhammad] informed us that we would defeat.”

Which organization on the campus is a front of Hamas?


Sure, no Jew hatred here,
and no documented party affiliation...
 
Last edited:
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus

Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.
 
Last edited:
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus

Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.

None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
 
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus

Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.

None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.


It's like saying that violence and discrimination against African Americans was caused by Sudan rather than by Americans themselves.

Racist BDS-hole bigots certainly have a problem with a law protecting the Jewish minority.
 
Last edited:
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.

Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
 
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus

Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.

None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

Actually, that's just typically ignorant. Hatred of Jews is enshrined in your Korans. You need to accept responsibility for what your ideology clearly delineates.
 
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.

Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.
 
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.

Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.


I said nothing about religion. I said: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their own homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing or worshiping in their own holy places.

Are you claiming that it is inherently evil for the Hindu people to have self-determination in their own homeland? To return to their own homeland? To worship in their own holy places?
 
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.

Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.


I said nothing about religion. I said: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their own homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing or worshiping in their own holy places.

Are you claiming that it is inherently evil for the Hindu people to have self-determination in their own homeland? To return to their own homeland? To worship in their own holy places?
:eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

How many of the settlers imported by the Zionists have ancestors from that territory?

Link?
 
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.

Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.

This has been addressed for you multiple times. Do a search. How many times does "Allah" appear in the Hamas charter? What specific group does "Allah" command moslems to revile.

Link?
 
How many of the settlers Jewish people imported by the Zionists Jewish people have ancestors from that territory?

Okay. So we AGREE then that there is nothing inherently evil about wanting self-determination in one's own homeland, yes? That there is nothing evil about returning to one's homeland, yes? And that there is nothing evil about wanting to worship at one's own holy places, yes? You AGREE with that concept, yes?

I'm going to answer your question yet again with the same answer -- ALL OF THEM. The Jewish people have the right to decide who belongs to the Jewish people. No one else has that right. This is inherent in the idea of a people. Self-identification is a vital part of self-determination -- which you insist is a human right belonging to all peoples, remember?

Your dispute, then, is over the idea that the Jewish people originated in that homeland. You deny that the Jewish people originate in that homeland. Which is not only utterly ridiculous -- it proves the very point I was trying to make -- that antisemitism is the pre-existing, deeply embedded ROOT CAUSE of criticism against Jewish self-determination.
 
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.

You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.

Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.


I said nothing about religion. I said: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their own homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing or worshiping in their own holy places.

Are you claiming that it is inherently evil for the Hindu people to have self-determination in their own homeland? To return to their own homeland? To worship in their own holy places?
:eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

How many of the settlers imported by the Zionists have ancestors from that territory?

Link?

Jewish people are an ethnic group with the longest presence in that territory, and they consider all Jews around the world as their family, BDS systematic attacks on a single tiny ethnic minority us the definition of hate crime. This raised concern in many countries where Jewish students were increasingly targeted, resulting in a revision of laws that protect from hate crime.

BDS attack on laws that protect the Jewish community is a burning hat on a thief.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top