Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
OK, but none of the Palestinian advocacy groups in the US are affiliated with any so called "terrorist" groups. They are all non partisan. There is no there there.
European Parliament: Is BDS antisemitic?
European Parliament: Is BDS antisemitic?
Four Zionists on a panel. I could see where that was going. Each had a deck of anti Semite cards that they played regularly throughout the program.
No anti Semitism here.
The Case for Cultural & Academic Boycott of Israel with intro by Ken Loach
European Parliament: Is BDS antisemitic?
Four Zionists on a panel. I could see where that was going. Each had a deck of anti Semite cards that they played regularly throughout the program.
No anti Semitism here.
The Case for Cultural & Academic Boycott of Israel with intro by Ken Loach
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus
Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus
Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
Crossing the Line : The New Face of Anti-Semitism on Campus
Those stories in the movie resemble a lot to what happened with Jewish students in Iraq, Egypt and USSR as a prelude to the worst times.
None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.
Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.
Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.
Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
I said nothing about religion. I said: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their own homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing or worshiping in their own holy places.
Are you claiming that it is inherently evil for the Hindu people to have self-determination in their own homeland? To return to their own homeland? To worship in their own holy places?
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.
Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
How many of thesettlersJewish people imported by theZionistsJewish people have ancestors from that territory?
Religion has nothing to do with it. If the occupation was Hindu, they would get the same response.None of this would happen without Israel. Israel is the lowest common denomination.
You are reversing cause and effect. Anti-semitism has been around for thousands of years. It is the widespread, deeply embedded anti-semitism which is the source of the problem. Israel is just the new focus of the existing anti-semitism.
Here's the litmus test: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing and worshiping in their own holy places. In fact, for most peoples of the world, these are seen as not only noble and worthy goals but actual human rights.
I said nothing about religion. I said: There is nothing inherently evil about a people wanting self-determination in their own homeland. Nor in people returning to their homeland. Nor in people accessing or worshiping in their own holy places.
Are you claiming that it is inherently evil for the Hindu people to have self-determination in their own homeland? To return to their own homeland? To worship in their own holy places?
How many of the settlers imported by the Zionists have ancestors from that territory?
Link?