economic growth picked up 2.5% last quarter

why did the Bush SEC keep these compliance times in place and refuse to impliment the bill for nearly a decade?
 
They gamed the system to siot the banks.


they did the banks bidding and screwed the people
 
dear idiot to prove that claim you need to go get SEC releases under clinton showing that they are holding BACK the broker rules.



A bill with HUGE implications for these massive entities are never implimented instantly.

compliance times are allowed.

8+ years is jerryriiging not reasonable compliance times

Why can't you just be honest for once and admit that the rules were held back by the SEC under both a Democrat president AND a Republican president?

Trying to pin it on Bush and not seeing the same thing happened under Clinton is just blind partisan hackery.

And knock it off with the "8+" years shit. I just showed you it was 2 months short of 8 years, not the over 8 years you are trying to push.
 
why did the Bush SEC keep these compliance times in place and refuse to impliment the bill for nearly a decade?

Oh for fuck's sake. Now you're trying to turn 7 years and 10 months into "nearly a decade"? :cuckoo:


Whoever is paying you to post here should demand a refund.
 
what was the implimentation plan for GLBact.

go get the documents which prove what you claim.

I already gave you documents to show the first year had a implimentation period waver for the banks to give time to comply.


Why did the Bush sec refuse to allow that plan to continue and instead held back the broker rules right up until a couple of days after Bush had to go on TV and tell us all the economy was about to tank.
 
what was the implimentation plan for GLBact.

go get the documents which prove what you claim.

I already gave you documents to show the first year had a implimentation period waver for the banks to give time to comply.


Why did the Bush sec refuse to allow that plan to continue and instead held back the broker rules right up until a couple of days after Bush had to go on TV and tell us all the economy was about to tank.

An implementation waiver does not mean the rules couldn't be enacted and waiting to take effect the minute the waiver expires.


But you knew that, and choose to ignore it because it doesn't fit your narative.
 
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190
Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.

In addition, the Commission also voted to issue

SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers

So the brokers who actually worked for the Securities Brokers still had to follow the rules all brokers have to follow.

Good to know.
Now what were you whining about again?
 
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers

So the brokers who actually worked for the Securities Brokers still had to follow the rules all brokers have to follow.

Good to know.
Now what were you whining about again?

Figured we would have gotten back to defending this phony recovery we are experiencing by now.
 
2.5% growth after 5 years of Obamanomics is good? Is that how low the bar is set?

Also F&F have records profits (A national shame and disgrace) so your "But Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh crashed the economy earned" excuse now earns you a tall glass of

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toxIiMWQgKA]Penn: Shut the fuck up - YouTube[/ame]
 
Prove its not a recovery using FACTS

Already did. Your labor force is getting shrinking and shrinking...

fredgraph.png

And the people leaving it are growing and growing...

fredgraph.png

Personal Incomes are shrinking...

fredgraph.png

Disposable Incomes are as well...

fredgraph.png

The economy is suppose to be getting 'wealthier' but more and more Americans are turning to credit to maintain their lifestyle.

fredgraph.png

Must have something to do with that pesky savings rate, which is practically non-existent...

fredgraph.png

Need any more 'facts?' I've got plenty.
 
Last edited:
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers

So the brokers who actually worked for the Securities Brokers still had to follow the rules all brokers have to follow.

Good to know.
Now what were you whining about again?

Figured we would have gotten back to defending this phony recovery we are experiencing by now.

It does seem a little phony when the Fed is buying most of the Treasury debt with newly printed money. The whole liberal welfare state would collapse tomorrow, just like Greece, if we had to pay our bills with real money as the Greeks have to thanks to the EU!!
 
Prove its not a recovery using FACTS

Already did. Your labor force is getting shrinking and shrinking...

fredgraph.png

And the people leaving it are growing and growing...

fredgraph.png

Personal Incomes are shrinking...

fredgraph.png

Disposable Incomes are as well...

fredgraph.png

The economy is suppose to be getting 'wealthier' but more and more Americans are turning to credit to maintain their lifestyle.

fredgraph.png

Must have something to do with that pesky savings rate, which is practically non-existent...

fredgraph.png

Need any more 'facts?' I've got plenty.

dear idiot ,


becuase the first of the baby boomers are retiring does not CHANGE the definition of recovery.


go get the Definition of recovery and tell me how what we are in does NOT fit that defintion.


You MUST be lying about what you do as a job or you muct be really shitty at it if you cant even understand you dotn get to redefine economic terms just to support your historically failed ideas
 
2.5% growth after 5 years of Obamanomics is good? Is that how low the bar is set?

Also F&F have records profits (A national shame and disgrace) so your "But Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh crashed the economy earned" excuse now earns you a tall glass of

Penn: Shut the fuck up - YouTube

This guy is a complete hack of a fat tub full of shit in a sloppy skin suit.


a real womens repellent
 
dear idiot ,


becuase the first of the baby boomers are retiring does not CHANGE the definition of recovery.

It's more than just a baby boomers. We are talking about almost a third of the country, no longer in the labor force. When Clintion left the White House, Civilian Labour Force Participation was 67%. When Bush left, it was still around the same level. Today, it's 63.3% and it's not heading in an upward trajectory. Explain how that is 'recovering.'

go get the Definition of recovery and tell me how what we are in does NOT fit that defintion.

It doesn't fit because nothing is getting back to normal, but rather worse than before. I've even shown it to you in numbers and statistics. It's not my fault you reality disagrees with you. There are a variety of indicators economist use to point out a recovery. The fact that you can barely identify one shows how limited your understanding of economics truly is.

You MUST be lying about what you do as a job or you muct be really shitty at it if you cant even understand you dotn get to redefine economic terms just to support your historically failed ideas

You don't need to be a Stock Broker. Just a basic understanding of economics will do. Your probably is that you've never bothered to learn any basics, but rather talking points from your favorite talking head. That will only get you so far, and that's not going to work with me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top