Ecce Homo

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Chips Rafferty, Sep 27, 2007.

  1. Chips Rafferty
    Offline

    Chips Rafferty Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    839
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    North of Melbourne, Australia.
    Ratings:
    +75
    Check out the archetypical Americhrischun hypocrite.

    I wonder if this WASP Wunderkind will advise G-e-e-zus to barm the disloyal Negroes, and the atheistic Christ-denyin' Chinks and A-rabs, into submitting to His celestial fascism when he goes to his “final reward.”

    Let’s hope this maggot's remuneration is half as hot as he helped make it for millions of gooks and coons. :badgrin:
     
  2. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Nope. Jus the Christ-denying Aussies.:eusa_whistle:
     
  3. Psychoblues
    Offline

    Psychoblues Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,701
    Thanks Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Missisippi
    Ratings:
    +143
    Maybe it's jaysus denying all that ain't in this brood?
     
  4. Chips Rafferty
    Offline

    Chips Rafferty Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    839
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    North of Melbourne, Australia.
    Ratings:
    +75
    Okay then, how about putting America's Jesus endorsed jackboot on another’s foot?

    Suppose Tariq Aziz (a practising CHRISCHUN) advised Saddam Hashein to barm the Mississippi levees and drown millions of sub-human Americans - for the heinous crime of, essentially, using a different accounting system to Iraq. How would you feel about that?

    Accountancy systems, if America's wars have nothing to do with rapine and "religion" (i.e. the root of a people's sense of racial/national superiority), as you claim, is fundiementally the only other thing the Christapitalist wars could be about.

    No?

    Didn’t think so. American's intrinsic narcissism renders them completely incapable of putting themselves in the “evil” other’s shoes. :)
     
  5. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    I love the way you pose the question, then presume to answer for the person you posed it to. I don't care what Tariq Aziz worships, and it's quite obvious that folk of the US-hating variety INDEED have a different accounting system than we do.

    Since I'm not much a relativist for the purpose of excusing my enemy's evil, I see no point in taking up every argument under the presumption I am wrong and he is right.

    That would be as opposed to you looking at EVERY arguments from the viewpoint that the US is evil and everyone else its victim.
     
  6. Ruby
    Offline

    Ruby Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +32
    Actually it would only require you to apply the same standards and rules to yourself as you do to others...but I think Chips post went WAAAY over your head.
     
  7. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Problem is, you using the term "I think." I understand perfectly well what Chips is trying to say, and of course can see exactly why you agree with him. But let's forget the smokescreen ....

    YOU and Chips think we should apply HIGHER standards to ourselves, not just same. It's obvious in his post. Your extremism is so blatantly obvious it's just a joke.
     
  8. Ruby
    Offline

    Ruby Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +32
    Not higher standards, the same standards.

    We want to make our own laws and have domain over our own domestic policies...so does every other nation and we need to back off and allow that as we expect people to do that for us.

    Here is a good example...lets take Iran.

    Now here we are and we need to place ourselves in the SAME position that we put Iran in and then see how we would view those same actions that the US have committed.

    Lets say that in 1953 the Iranian govt overthrew our govt and installed a dictator who was willing to cater more to Irans needs than the US's and that in the decades of this Iranian installed dictator we suffered horribly under his brutal policies against any of us who dared speak up or challenge his dictatorship.

    We finally get the momentum up and we rise up and overthrow this dictator and install our own govt. The one we install is certainly far from perfect but it is OURS and done by US, the people. Iran has many criticisms of our govt but its really not their RIGHT to say is it?

    Then Iran backs Canada in an uprovoked invasion of us. We are now at war because Canada attacked and Iran is one of the nations helping to supply aid (weapons, chemicals, logistical support etc). Then Canada starts using chemical/biological warfare on american towns and people are dying in horrific ways and we go to international community but Iran wont condem it and in fact Iran and its allies are HELPING to supply the chemicals Canada is using against us.

    We fight for many bloody years and we manage to maintain ourselves and not be defeated, but the human cost is HUGE. We suffered, all of us have lost someone in this horrible battle.

    Then some years later Canadas leadership isnt doing what Iran wants..so Iran invades them to change the regime. So Iran is now attacking our neighbor and has its military on our border and is currently making more threats claiming we are making nuclear weapons...(yet Iran has a large arsenal of nuclear weapons) and we arent building them nor do they have ANY evidence we are...but they threaten us anyway. We allow inspectors in, the inspectors say we arent building weapons and can find no evidence that we are. Now Iran just ignores this and keeps accusing us anyway and Iran and its powerful allies now want to sanction us and keep threatening to invade us.

    Iran calls us aggressive but it is them who overthrew our govt and installed a brutal dictator, it is them that backed our neighbor in an aggressive war against us, it is them who supplied and condoned biological warfare against us, it is them who have huge stockpiles of wmd, its them who are invading nations based on false claims of WMD and now are sitting ON OUR BORDER with their military threatening us again and SAY ITS OUR FAULT and we ARE DANGEROUS!

    How would you be viewing that? All I did was lay out exactly what has occured but traded places for Iran and the US.

    If you apply the same standards, then you have to admit, its the US who is dangerous and exceeds its bounds legally as well as morally.
     
  9. Darwin
    Offline

    Darwin Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2007
    Messages:
    58
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +2
    Yep
     
  10. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    Stop babbling :D
     

Share This Page