Eat Shit, 'Global Warming Researchers', Says Dave
Back atcha, Dave.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eat Shit, 'Global Warming Researchers', Says Dave
Moron ALERT. Guess what you brain dead fucking hack? Similar events have happened in the past and will happen again in the future. Explain why the heat wave in the 30's got "adjusted" to avoid the inconvenient fact that it was hotter then?
not to mention Mann's hockey stick graph that was such a good poster for the alarmist AGW set that they ignored all the previous evidence for the Medieval Warm Period and Liitle Ice Age. and accepted and peer review passed a paper with 'unusual' statistical methods and undocumented data combined in an unscientific fashion. if ever there was a case of coming to preformed conclusions, that was the one.
Ian, you have joined Westwall and mdn in repeating meaningless lies.
In the video lectures from the 2010 American Geophysical Union Conferance, Dr. Thompson presented the evidence from glaciers concerning both events, from glaciers all over the world.
A42D
Eat Bugs, Not Meat, Say 'Global Warming Researchers'
Foxnews.com ^ | January 16, 2011 | Ethan A. Huff
Researchers from Wageningen University in the Netherlands say that insects produce far less greenhouse gases than cattle and pigs do, and would thus be a viable alternative to eating meat. Published in the journal PLoS ONE, the study found that pigs, for instance, produce up to one hundred times more greenhouse gases than the equivalent weight of mealworms.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
Id rather be on a 8c warmer planet or die then eat bugs thats for fuck sure. Give me pork, beef, steak, chicken ect.
So, are you going to switch from meat to bugs?Eat Shit, 'Global Warming Researchers', Says Dave
Back atcha, Dave.
So, are you going to switch from meat to bugs?Eat Shit, 'Global Warming Researchers', Says Dave
Back atcha, Dave.
Or is this yet another case of leftist hypocrisy?
What's preformed? If GHGs keep going up, warming is inevitable. Even on a log scale the 40% increase in CO2 favored by some, represents a 15% increase in heat-trapping ability. That's significant in just about anybody's book. It seems that lots of data is thrown about merely to obscure this fact, because the deniers can't answer a basic question, "what happens if GHGs keep going up?"
Moron ALERT. Guess what you brain dead fucking hack? Similar events have happened in the past and will happen again in the future. Explain why the heat wave in the 30's got "adjusted" to avoid the inconvenient fact that it was hotter then?
not to mention Mann's hockey stick graph that was such a good poster for the alarmist AGW set that they ignored all the previous evidence for the Medieval Warm Period and Liitle Ice Age. and accepted and peer review passed a paper with 'unusual' statistical methods and undocumented data combined in an unscientific fashion. if ever there was a case of coming to preformed conclusions, that was the one.
Ian, you have joined Westwall and mdn in repeating meaningless lies.
In the video lectures from the 2010 American Geophysical Union Conferance, Dr. Thompson presented the evidence from glaciers concerning both events, from glaciers all over the world.
A42D
not to mention Mann's hockey stick graph that was such a good poster for the alarmist AGW set that they ignored all the previous evidence for the Medieval Warm Period and Liitle Ice Age. and accepted and peer review passed a paper with 'unusual' statistical methods and undocumented data combined in an unscientific fashion. if ever there was a case of coming to preformed conclusions, that was the one.
Ian, you have joined Westwall and mdn in repeating meaningless lies.
In the video lectures from the 2010 American Geophysical Union Conferance, Dr. Thompson presented the evidence from glaciers concerning both events, from glaciers all over the world.
A42D
Yes, I sat in on that lecture as well. Of course they didn't bother to answer my questions about the flash frozen plant life that they have as the glacier retreated. Yes you read correctly, flash frozen. You see the Quelccaya Glacier that she referenced shows some very intersting facts. The region saw it's highest temps roughly 7,500 years ago and since then there has been a steady decline. Blips up and down but the trend is ever downward.
And as the glacier has retreated this time around we find that the climate did indeed change rapidly, so rapidly that plants were flash frozen.
So I wonder, did somebody transplant a whole bunch of SUVs back in time to pollute the air to get the rapid change going? Or did it happen on its own.
National Geographic actually did a story on the glacier a while back and it was actually on the OK side, speaking with some good scientists, of course they then had to filter it through the whole AGW BS paradigm but there is some good info in it.