Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?Respectfully, I think both you (Ernie), Brain, and (maybe?) Stephanie should alter your perspective on this.
1) No matter what, celebrating someone who is in critical condition and wanting the person to die is wrong. Callous at best.
2) People have a right to be armed, and no, the victim doesn't have to walk away or obey the words of a drunken punk.
3) I think the victim was in the right to defend himself, but I'm not rejoicing or cheering for the guy who attacked him to die. Gotta keep it within reason, or else you slide to one extreme or the other.
I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
By that stupid logic, cops shouldn't carry guns either because when their life is threatened, they will use their guns instead of looking for alternative solutions.Applauding such activity is horrifying. Bullets whizzing around in the city are to be avoided, not encouraged. It shows that carrying guns all the time leads the carrier to resort to them instead of finding another solution. Worse, it gives the carrier the 'feeling' of security where, without the gun, he/she wouldn't go otherwise.
Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?Respectfully, I think both you (Ernie), Brain, and (maybe?) Stephanie should alter your perspective on this.
1) No matter what, celebrating someone who is in critical condition and wanting the person to die is wrong. Callous at best.
2) People have a right to be armed, and no, the victim doesn't have to walk away or obey the words of a drunken punk.
3) I think the victim was in the right to defend himself, but I'm not rejoicing or cheering for the guy who attacked him to die. Gotta keep it within reason, or else you slide to one extreme or the other.
I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
Seems it's the return of the wild, wild west...[/QUOTE]So you actually think the moral of the story is one guy did some "good shooting" ----- and ignore the elephant in the room that people are shooting at each other in public?
Wacko.
What were the right words to use with a drunk, street-dumb?Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?Respectfully, I think both you (Ernie), Brain, and (maybe?) Stephanie should alter your perspective on this.
1) No matter what, celebrating someone who is in critical condition and wanting the person to die is wrong. Callous at best.
2) People have a right to be armed, and no, the victim doesn't have to walk away or obey the words of a drunken punk.
3) I think the victim was in the right to defend himself, but I'm not rejoicing or cheering for the guy who attacked him to die. Gotta keep it within reason, or else you slide to one extreme or the other.
I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
I'm pretty sure words were said by both parties before shooting began. And if the right words were used there would have been no shooting. Instead they both had guns and decided to talk with them endangering everyone in the area.
Seems it's the return of the wild, wild west...Yes....this teenager learned a lesson...that is if he survives...perhaps if he survives he will get to rehab and turn his life around......until then....good shooting...
So you actually think the moral of the story is one guy did some "good shooting" ----- and ignore the elephant in the room that people are shooting at each other in public?
Wacko.
What were the right words to use with a drunk, street-dumb?Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?Respectfully, I think both you (Ernie), Brain, and (maybe?) Stephanie should alter your perspective on this.
1) No matter what, celebrating someone who is in critical condition and wanting the person to die is wrong. Callous at best.
2) People have a right to be armed, and no, the victim doesn't have to walk away or obey the words of a drunken punk.
3) I think the victim was in the right to defend himself, but I'm not rejoicing or cheering for the guy who attacked him to die. Gotta keep it within reason, or else you slide to one extreme or the other.
I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
I'm pretty sure words were said by both parties before shooting began. And if the right words were used there would have been no shooting. Instead they both had guns and decided to talk with them endangering everyone in the area.
Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?Respectfully, I think both you (Ernie), Brain, and (maybe?) Stephanie should alter your perspective on this.
1) No matter what, celebrating someone who is in critical condition and wanting the person to die is wrong. Callous at best.
2) People have a right to be armed, and no, the victim doesn't have to walk away or obey the words of a drunken punk.
3) I think the victim was in the right to defend himself, but I'm not rejoicing or cheering for the guy who attacked him to die. Gotta keep it within reason, or else you slide to one extreme or the other.
I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
I'm pretty sure words were said by both parties before shooting began. And if the right words were used there would have been no shooting. Instead they both had guns and decided to talk with them endangering everyone in the area.
Seems it's the return of the wild, wild west...So you actually think the moral of the story is one guy did some "good shooting" ----- and ignore the elephant in the room that people are shooting at each other in public?
Wacko.
What were the right words to use with a drunk, street-dumb?Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
I'm pretty sure words were said by both parties before shooting began. And if the right words were used there would have been no shooting. Instead they both had guns and decided to talk with them endangering everyone in the area.
Well I have run into a lot of dumb drunk people and had no problem avoiding any sort of fights. But I guess I'm not all hopped up on gun courage and have common sense.
What were the right words to use with a drunk, street-dumb?Who ever accused Leftists of having street smarts? Their fantasy of how the world should work is so convincing that they will turn their back on an armed and shooting assailant. And even as the life seeps out of their stupid bodies, they'll still cling to the movie in their heads.Better to walk away?????? There was a drunk gangbanger SHOOTING at him. Walking away when you have a gun?I agree with you. Though on point 2 I would just say it is typically better to walk away. But as you say the victim doesn't have to walk away.
I'm pretty sure words were said by both parties before shooting began. And if the right words were used there would have been no shooting. Instead they both had guns and decided to talk with them endangering everyone in the area.
Well I have run into a lot of dumb drunk people and had no problem avoiding any sort of fights. But I guess I'm not all hopped up on gun courage and have common sense.
Seems it's the return of the wild, wild west...So you actually think the moral of the story is one guy did some "good shooting" ----- and ignore the elephant in the room that people are shooting at each other in public?
Wacko.
Applauding such activity is horrifying. Bullets whizzing around in the city are to be avoided, not encouraged. It shows that carrying guns all the time leads the carrier to resort to them instead of finding another solution. Worse, it gives the carrier the 'feeling' of security where, without the gun, he/she wouldn't go otherwise.
Yeah....some more local news from Tioga...another attempted murder....
Do I have to guess which political party runs this area....?
http://6abc.com/news/woman-charged-with-attempted-murder-in-tioga-nicetown-hit-and-run/666861/
If he is a good shot and uses hollow points, shouldn't be no danger.Yes....this teenager learned a lesson...that is if he survives...perhaps if he survives he will get to rehab and turn his life around......until then....good shooting...
PA Concealed Carrier Defends Self Against Armed Thug Hits All His Marks Concealed Nation
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA — An intoxicated 19 year old allegedly told a concealed carrier to get off his block before opening fire.
According to Philly.com, Officer Christine O’Brien confirmed that the concealed carrier responded with deadly force. While the 19 year old fled the scene, he later wound up at Temple University Hospital in critical condition. Apparently, the concealed carrier had decent aim – the 19 year old assailant had gunshots in his arms, abdomen and his neck.
When that kid wakes up, Philadelphia Police expect to charge him with aggravated assault amongst other charges. While they recovered the 25-year-old man’s gun, they haven’t been able to locate the 19-year-old’s.
The investigation is ongoing, and all signs point to the concealed carrier not being charged with any crimes.
So this is good for you? A shootout in the street. Good thing nobody was hit by any strays. Guy should have got off his block and called the cops. A shootout in the street is dangerous for everyone in the neighborhood.
Yeah. They do.Yeah....some more local news from Tioga...another attempted murder....
Do I have to guess which political party runs this area....?
http://6abc.com/news/woman-charged-with-attempted-murder-in-tioga-nicetown-hit-and-run/666861/
Political parties don't run "areas", stupid.
Seems it's the return of the wild, wild west...So you actually think the moral of the story is one guy did some "good shooting" ----- and ignore the elephant in the room that people are shooting at each other in public?
Wacko.
Applauding such activity is horrifying. Bullets whizzing around in the city are to be avoided, not encouraged. It shows that carrying guns all the time leads the carrier to resort to them instead of finding another solution. Worse, it gives the carrier the 'feeling' of security where, without the gun, he/she wouldn't go otherwise.
Yeah what part of....the drunk teenager started shooting.......did you miss before the concealed carrier had to shoot to stop the guy........the guy with the legal gun didn't start shooting until the other guy started shooting at him....and endangering everyone in the neighborhood.........
Yeah....some more local news from Tioga...another attempted murder....
Do I have to guess which political party runs this area....?
http://6abc.com/news/woman-charged-with-attempted-murder-in-tioga-nicetown-hit-and-run/666861/
Political parties don't run "areas", stupid.
