Drones, ISIS, and U.S. Citizens

[Freewill]

When US citizens willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily put themselves beyond the operation of due process and wage war against the US, drone far is not assassination but rather an appropriate act of war.

If right wing or left wing or libertarian militias ever rise up, their members would be justified targets of drone fire.

And who gets to decide if they willingly did so? THAT is the point, that is the point of due process. Government abuse is why we have the system we have.

 

[Kosh]

When US citizens willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily put themselves beyond the operation of due process and wage war against the US, drone far is not assassination but rather an appropriate act of war.

If right wing or left wing or libertarian militias ever rise up, their members would be justified targets of drone fire.

And who gets to decide if they willingly did so? THAT is the point, that is the point of due process. Government abuse is why we have the system we have.

Actually it is Obama...

The Day 'Due Process' Died: Obama, Holder and the End of Rights
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/03/07-0

And that is from the far left common dreams blog site..

 

[whitehall]

So we have these U.S. citizens fighting for ISIS:

Welcome to Forbes

I'm just curious, if an ISIS unit that has u.s. citizens in it attacks the U.S. embassy - the President's got to have a trial before he kills those u.s. citizens, right? He can't just unleash a drone attack on them without justice, that would be unconstitutional. Doesn't matter how many Marins or U.S. ambassadors die - we have to protect these U.S. citizens right to trial.

Is that how that works?

A freaking 5th grader understands that you can use deadly force to protect Americans but it's against the law to specifically target a US citizen for execution without due process.