Donald Trump War On Women

The history of Donald Trump's insults to women

Trump’s misogynistic shots at Fox News host Megyn Kelly are just the tip of the iceberg. Here, a look at his long, dark history of offensive comments about women.

How has Donald Trump insulted women? Let us count just some of the ways.

In 2012, he tweeted that Arianna Huffington “is unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man—he made a good decision.”

On Celebrity Apprentice: All-Stars in 2013, he mused aboutthe “pretty picture” of former Playboy Playmate Brande Roderick “dropping to your knees.”

He called opposing counsel in a deposition “disgusting” for wanting to break to pump milk for her 3-month-old daughter.


In his book, How to Get Rich, he wrote: “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me—consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.”

In a 1991 Esquire interview, he said: “You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of [expletive].”

Most famously, in a 2006 feud involving Miss USA, he called Rosie O’Donnell an “animal,” an “extremely unattractive person,” and a “slob.”

And now, of course, comes his attack on Fox News host and debate moderator Megyn Kelly (full disclosure: I’m a Fox News contributor.) The war of words started after Kelly asked whether his descriptions of various women (“pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals”) suggested that Trump didn’t have the temperament to be president.

More: The history of Donald Trump’s insults to women - Fortune

The list goes on to include Carly Fiorina and Hillary Clinton - and many more.
There is no Trump "war on women", dumbass.

It's the entire Republican party that has war on women. Abortion, abortion, abortion. The reason you lost in 2012 was because the Republican platform was about abortion, and then it went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what is legitimate rape. You lost women by double digits, younger women by a whopping 36 points. This secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

The talk in 2012 was also about immigration. The last President win was G.W. Bush. He captured 44% of the Hispanic vote, Romney lost by only capturing 27%.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study

Romney's fate (even though a moderate candidate) was sealed long before he won the nomination. You right wingers did that.

With Trump in this race--and with YOUR support you have already cost the Republicans the Presidency. In fact it wouldn't surprise me in the least that the Senate is gone, and you will lose a ton of seats in the house.

What you DUMB-ASS'S never realized is that Republicans have to capture 40% of the Hispanic vote to win the White House, and Republicans in the entire southwest of this country depend on Hispanics to win elections. Including Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz--who probably won't be winning their seats back in the Senate BECAUSE OF YOU---lol. And which is probably why as Freshmen Senators they are running for POTUS. because they know themselves (since they have flip-flopped on immigration) that they don't have a shot in hell of retaining their seats in 2018.

The Right Wing of the Republican party are Democrats biggest supporters.
tumblr_mtg1rvq7O51r55d2io1_1280.jpg
There is no GOP war on women either., dumbass.

If it wasn't for the GOP, women would be lucky if they were even allowed to vote.
Why then hasn't the GOP gone full tilt on equal pay legislation? On family leave? On protecting reproductive freedom?
Why would they?

What would that idiotic crap accomplish?
First such 'idiotic crap' is essentially fairness rather than repression. Secondly, it would dispell the truth of the GOP war on women.

But fairness is anathema to Conservatives. And delusion about how to accommodate the rights of women is a Conservative trait of the first order.
 
There is no Trump "war on women", dumbass.

It's the entire Republican party that has war on women. Abortion, abortion, abortion. The reason you lost in 2012 was because the Republican platform was about abortion, and then it went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what is legitimate rape. You lost women by double digits, younger women by a whopping 36 points. This secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

The talk in 2012 was also about immigration. The last President win was G.W. Bush. He captured 44% of the Hispanic vote, Romney lost by only capturing 27%.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study

Romney's fate (even though a moderate candidate) was sealed long before he won the nomination. You right wingers did that.

With Trump in this race--and with YOUR support you have already cost the Republicans the Presidency. In fact it wouldn't surprise me in the least that the Senate is gone, and you will lose a ton of seats in the house.

What you DUMB-ASS'S never realized is that Republicans have to capture 40% of the Hispanic vote to win the White House, and Republicans in the entire southwest of this country depend on Hispanics to win elections. Including Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz--who probably won't be winning their seats back in the Senate BECAUSE OF YOU---lol. And which is probably why as Freshmen Senators they are running for POTUS. because they know themselves (since they have flip-flopped on immigration) that they don't have a shot in hell of retaining their seats in 2018.

The Right Wing of the Republican party are Democrats biggest supporters.
tumblr_mtg1rvq7O51r55d2io1_1280.jpg
There is no GOP war on women either., dumbass.

If it wasn't for the GOP, women would be lucky if they were even allowed to vote.
Why then hasn't the GOP gone full tilt on equal pay legislation? On family leave? On protecting reproductive freedom?
Why would they?

What would that idiotic crap accomplish?
First such 'idiotic crap' is essentially fairness rather than repression. Secondly, it would dispell the truth of the GOP war on women.
First of all, those of us who are not idiots know that "fairness" and "repression" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Furthermore, the GOP has no reason to dispel the truth that they had to fight the Democrats tooth and nail to get womens' suffrage rammed through congress.
 
If one reads through the above links - they will find some really disgusting stuff that Trump has said about women over the years. Seriously disgusting, gross, and vulgar.
What Trump said was more disgsuting than painting with menstrual blood? Gettoutahere.
 
It's the entire Republican party that has war on women. Abortion, abortion, abortion. The reason you lost in 2012 was because the Republican platform was about abortion, and then it went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what is legitimate rape. You lost women by double digits, younger women by a whopping 36 points. This secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

The talk in 2012 was also about immigration. The last President win was G.W. Bush. He captured 44% of the Hispanic vote, Romney lost by only capturing 27%.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study

Romney's fate (even though a moderate candidate) was sealed long before he won the nomination. You right wingers did that.

With Trump in this race--and with YOUR support you have already cost the Republicans the Presidency. In fact it wouldn't surprise me in the least that the Senate is gone, and you will lose a ton of seats in the house.

What you DUMB-ASS'S never realized is that Republicans have to capture 40% of the Hispanic vote to win the White House, and Republicans in the entire southwest of this country depend on Hispanics to win elections. Including Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz--who probably won't be winning their seats back in the Senate BECAUSE OF YOU---lol. And which is probably why as Freshmen Senators they are running for POTUS. because they know themselves (since they have flip-flopped on immigration) that they don't have a shot in hell of retaining their seats in 2018.

The Right Wing of the Republican party are Democrats biggest supporters.
tumblr_mtg1rvq7O51r55d2io1_1280.jpg
There is no GOP war on women either., dumbass.

If it wasn't for the GOP, women would be lucky if they were even allowed to vote.
Why then hasn't the GOP gone full tilt on equal pay legislation? On family leave? On protecting reproductive freedom?
Why would they?

What would that idiotic crap accomplish?
First such 'idiotic crap' is essentially fairness rather than repression. Secondly, it would dispell the truth of the GOP war on women.
First of all, those of us who are not idiots know that "fairness" and "repression" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Furthermore, the GOP has no reason to dispel the truth that they had to fight the Democrats tooth and nail to get womens' suffrage rammed through congress.
Those Republicans of nearly one hundred years ago who fought for suffer age would be purged as RINOS from today's GOP.
 
Yawn..............the beginning of the constant Whining ass Campaign of the Liberal Brigade......................

As their Liar Candidate tries to defend her Lying Ass from 1,000's of Classified Documents on a private server...........a major breach of Classified Document Protocol..............

And the Liberals just shrug their shoulders and say OH FUCKING WELL.....................Low lifes.

They will dig out anything they can to try to knock off his popularity. Sorry, but it ain't gonna work. :)
 
Adolf Trump "may" win the GOP Primary - but he has no path to the White House. He has pissed off too many blacks, Hispanics, LGBTs, and women. It's just a simple fact - MATH.
 
There is no GOP war on women either., dumbass.

If it wasn't for the GOP, women would be lucky if they were even allowed to vote.
Why then hasn't the GOP gone full tilt on equal pay legislation? On family leave? On protecting reproductive freedom?
Why would they?

What would that idiotic crap accomplish?
First such 'idiotic crap' is essentially fairness rather than repression. Secondly, it would dispell the truth of the GOP war on women.
First of all, those of us who are not idiots know that "fairness" and "repression" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Furthermore, the GOP has no reason to dispel the truth that they had to fight the Democrats tooth and nail to get womens' suffrage rammed through congress.
Those Republicans of nearly one hundred years ago who fought for suffer age would be purged as RINOS from today's GOP.
:rolleyes:

That's a ridiculously speculative and humorously imaginative alternate reality scenario.

What have you been smoking?
 
Why then hasn't the GOP gone full tilt on equal pay legislation? On family leave? On protecting reproductive freedom?
Why would they?

What would that idiotic crap accomplish?
First such 'idiotic crap' is essentially fairness rather than repression. Secondly, it would dispell the truth of the GOP war on women.
First of all, those of us who are not idiots know that "fairness" and "repression" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Furthermore, the GOP has no reason to dispel the truth that they had to fight the Democrats tooth and nail to get womens' suffrage rammed through congress.
Those Republicans of nearly one hundred years ago who fought for suffer age would be purged as RINOS from today's GOP.
:rolleyes:

That's a ridiculously speculative and humorously imaginative alternate reality scenario.

What have you been smoking?
INave you ever read history?
 
Why would they?

What would that idiotic crap accomplish?
First such 'idiotic crap' is essentially fairness rather than repression. Secondly, it would dispell the truth of the GOP war on women.
First of all, those of us who are not idiots know that "fairness" and "repression" are not mutually exclusive terms.

Furthermore, the GOP has no reason to dispel the truth that they had to fight the Democrats tooth and nail to get womens' suffrage rammed through congress.
Those Republicans of nearly one hundred years ago who fought for suffer age would be purged as RINOS from today's GOP.
:rolleyes:

That's a ridiculously speculative and humorously imaginative alternate reality scenario.

What have you been smoking?
INave you ever read history?
I think I've already made that abundantly clear.
 
oT41FYI.jpg


NaziCon assholes want this clown as president.


Hey there SITTING BULL.(sh**) Why don't you get out of the outhouse on the reservation, where you and your Indian pals fleece the American taxpayer, and join the real world. I hear peyote buttons aren't so good for your health, but with all the "pretty liberal colors" you see on here, I am sure you want to keep status quo!

INTERVIEWER: Lacootie, wasn't golden beard George, Armstrong, Custer.........the worst person to ever enter Indian life?

LACOOTIE: No, it is Trump; always Trump, all the time......until it is Cruz, or Carson, or anyone else who wants to take my free meds away! I want my meds, my Obama phone to call the chief, my food stamps to feed the papooses, and free birth control so I can stop having them.

Meanwhile, I can bank the thousands coming in from my favorite Indian Casino, I don't have to pay my fairshare, and as long as I walk around with my hair in a pony tail, looking sad and gazing out into space, I am as protected as "black lives matter!"

I am "LACOOTIE!" Wannabee chief of the Nez-Pers, the Chiracowas, or any other Indian tribe I can phony-baloney my way into-) Just give me that tax free Indian Casino cash baby!
 
oT41FYI.jpg


NaziCon assholes want this clown as president.


Hey there SITTING BULL.(sh**) Why don't you get out of the outhouse on the reservation, where you and your Indian pals fleece the American taxpayer, and join the real world. I hear peyote buttons aren't so good for your health, but with all the "pretty liberal colors" you see on here, I am sure you want to keep status quo!

INTERVIEWER: Lacootie, wasn't golden beard George, Armstrong, Custer.........the worst person to ever enter Indian life?

LACOOTIE: No, it is Trump; always Trump, all the time......until it is Cruz, or Carson, or anyone else who wants to take my free meds away! I want my meds, my Obama phone to call the chief, my food stamps to feed the papooses, and free birth control so I can stop having them.

Meanwhile, I can bank the thousands coming in from my favorite Indian Casino, I don't have to pay my fairshare, and as long as I walk around with my hair in a pony tail, looking sad and gazing out into space, I am as protected as "black lives matter!"

I am "LACOOTIE!" Wannabee chief of the Nez-Pers, the Chiracowas, or any other Indian tribe I can phony-baloney my way into-) Just give me that tax free Indian Casino cash baby!

Apparently I live rent free in your racist head. What a scary thought...
 
Last edited:
The history of Donald Trump's insults to women

Trump’s misogynistic shots at Fox News host Megyn Kelly are just the tip of the iceberg. Here, a look at his long, dark history of offensive comments about women.

How has Donald Trump insulted women? Let us count just some of the ways.

In 2012, he tweeted that Arianna Huffington “is unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man—he made a good decision.”

On Celebrity Apprentice: All-Stars in 2013, he mused aboutthe “pretty picture” of former Playboy Playmate Brande Roderick “dropping to your knees.”

He called opposing counsel in a deposition “disgusting” for wanting to break to pump milk for her 3-month-old daughter.


In his book, How to Get Rich, he wrote: “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me—consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.”

In a 1991 Esquire interview, he said: “You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of [expletive].”

Most famously, in a 2006 feud involving Miss USA, he called Rosie O’Donnell an “animal,” an “extremely unattractive person,” and a “slob.”

And now, of course, comes his attack on Fox News host and debate moderator Megyn Kelly (full disclosure: I’m a Fox News contributor.) The war of words started after Kelly asked whether his descriptions of various women (“pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals”) suggested that Trump didn’t have the temperament to be president.

More: The history of Donald Trump’s insults to women - Fortune

The list goes on to include Carly Fiorina and Hillary Clinton - and many more.
There is no Trump "war on women", dumbass.

It's the entire Republican party that has war on women. Abortion, abortion, abortion. The reason you lost in 2012 was because the Republican platform was about abortion, and then it went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what is legitimate rape. You lost women by double digits, younger women by a whopping 36 points. This secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

The talk in 2012 was also about immigration. The last President win was G.W. Bush. He captured 44% of the Hispanic vote, Romney lost by only capturing 27%.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study

Romney's fate (even though a moderate candidate) was sealed long before he won the nomination. You right wingers did that.

With Trump in this race--and with YOUR support you have already cost the Republicans the Presidency. In fact it wouldn't surprise me in the least that the Senate is gone, and you will lose a ton of seats in the house.

What you DUMB-ASS'S never realized is that Republicans have to capture 40% of the Hispanic vote to win the White House, and Republicans in the entire southwest of this country depend on Hispanics to win elections. Including Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz--who probably won't be winning their seats back in the Senate BECAUSE OF YOU---lol. And which is probably why as Freshmen Senators they are running for POTUS. because they know themselves (since they have flip-flopped on immigration) that they don't have a shot in hell of retaining their seats in 2018.

The Right Wing of the Republican party are Democrats biggest supporters.
tumblr_mtg1rvq7O51r55d2io1_1280.jpg
There is no GOP war on women either., dumbass.

If it wasn't for the GOP, women would be lucky if they were even allowed to vote.


Well, apparently WOMEN believe that Republicans have a war on women--and since they are the largest voting block in this country, you probably should pay attention to what they think, instead of what you think--LOL
How women ruled the 2012 election and where the GOP went wrong - CNNPolitics.com
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

interesting article
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing

Tea-Party-agenda-GOP.jpg
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top