Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 102,607
- 83,941
- 3,645
As did the Obama administration. As will the next president.Trump is now allowing companies to go into our National Forests and drill and mine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As did the Obama administration. As will the next president.Trump is now allowing companies to go into our National Forests and drill and mine.
You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
I tried to read this, but found that I grew dizzy from the spin about half way through. As near as I can tell, it had something to do with "black is white, and white is black"
Oh well.
he law only stopped the US from drilling, thus putting us behind, costing jobs, and increasing the debt.What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!
While We Weren't Looking, Donald Trump Just Reversed Another Obama-Era Environmental Regulation
President Donald Trump quietly signed an executive order rescinding Obama-era protections of U.S. oceans, coastlines, and Great Lakes waters on Tuesday, just weeks after proclaiming June “National Ocean Month.”
Drill, Baby. Drill
President Pence will lose in a landslide in 2020....and the next Democratic president will reinstate the policy.
Maybe, but 2032 is a long ways off...…...
Burn, baby, burn.Drill, Baby. Drill
You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
I tried to read this, but found that I grew dizzy from the spin about half way through. As near as I can tell, it had something to do with "black is white, and white is black"
Oh well.
You really are some kind of shameless coporate shill. I hope, at least, you get paid for your efforts. Whores should get paid.You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
I tried to read this, but found that I grew dizzy from the spin about half way through. As near as I can tell, it had something to do with "black is white, and white is black"
Oh well.
I think you got dizzy because it was beyond your ability to understand why I brought up the factual information about natural oil seeps in contrast to his opinions which he has yet to elaborate. After that very post I wrote you that you misread badly, he vanished after being exposed by TNHarley so effectively for his poor answers to him.
Meanwhile you failed to realize that Confounding didn't even read the article well if at all since it wasn't even about drilling as TNHarley pointed out HERE at post 10.
I can understand your dizziness caused by your own spin on something you make clear you have no clue about,when you didn't pay attention to what TNharley, Confounding and Me were talking about.
Cheers.
You really are some kind of shameless coporate shill. I hope, at least, you get paid for your efforts. Whores should get paid.You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
I tried to read this, but found that I grew dizzy from the spin about half way through. As near as I can tell, it had something to do with "black is white, and white is black"
Oh well.
I think you got dizzy because it was beyond your ability to understand why I brought up the factual information about natural oil seeps in contrast to his opinions which he has yet to elaborate. After that very post I wrote you that you misread badly, he vanished after being exposed by TNHarley so effectively for his poor answers to him.
Meanwhile you failed to realize that Confounding didn't even read the article well if at all since it wasn't even about drilling as TNHarley pointed out HERE at post 10.
I can understand your dizziness caused by your own spin on something you make clear you have no clue about,when you didn't pay attention to what TNharley, Confounding and Me were talking about.
Cheers.
And yet, there you are, on the wrong side of history and science. Pro tip: you are not actually presenting a challenge to accepted scientific theories. No, you are not mounting an argument. You are pulling your Taffy on a message board. People who9uny arguments against accaeoetd ideas do so through research of their own.You really are some kind of shameless coporate shill. I hope, at least, you get paid for your efforts. Whores should get paid.You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
I tried to read this, but found that I grew dizzy from the spin about half way through. As near as I can tell, it had something to do with "black is white, and white is black"
Oh well.
I think you got dizzy because it was beyond your ability to understand why I brought up the factual information about natural oil seeps in contrast to his opinions which he has yet to elaborate. After that very post I wrote you that you misread badly, he vanished after being exposed by TNHarley so effectively for his poor answers to him.
Meanwhile you failed to realize that Confounding didn't even read the article well if at all since it wasn't even about drilling as TNHarley pointed out HERE at post 10.
I can understand your dizziness caused by your own spin on something you make clear you have no clue about,when you didn't pay attention to what TNharley, Confounding and Me were talking about.
Cheers.
You apparently have NO ability to mount a single argument on the topic at all. just your usual empty babble is the best you can dredge up.
Cheers.
Ever hear of reclamation?Trump is now allowing companies to go into our National Forests and drill and mine. So much for much of our wildlife habitats, hiking areas and camping sites. By the time he's done, it'll just be people, pets, parking lots, assorted business buildings, mining and drilling companies. If people want to enjoy the forest, they'll just have to have various DVD's of them.What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!
While We Weren't Looking, Donald Trump Just Reversed Another Obama-Era Environmental Regulation
President Donald Trump quietly signed an executive order rescinding Obama-era protections of U.S. oceans, coastlines, and Great Lakes waters on Tuesday, just weeks after proclaiming June “National Ocean Month.”
And yet, there you are, on the wrong side of history and science. Pro tip: you are not actually presenting a challenge to accepted scientific theories. No, you are not mounting an argument. You are pulling your Taffy on a message board. People who9uny arguments against accaeoetd ideas do so through research of their own.You really are some kind of shameless coporate shill. I hope, at least, you get paid for your efforts. Whores should get paid.You originally state in the first post:
"What's a few more massive oil spills? There's money to be made!"
Then you were asked this question:
"My question is, what is wrong with this EO?"
You replied with ANOTHER opinion:
"I don't support increased ocean drilling. We do enough damage to our oceans already. I tend to be a planet over profits kind of person."
Opinions is all you offered so far.
You have yet to show WHY his EO is wrong, since there are natural oil seeps already existing in the Gulf of Mexico and in many other areas, yet no measurable damage to them is found. From Wikipedia:
Petroleum seep
"A petroleum seep is a place where natural liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons escape to the earth's atmosphere and surface, normally under low pressure or flow. Seeps generally occur above either terrestrial or offshore petroleum accumulation structures.[1][not in citation given] The hydrocarbons may escape along geological layers, or across them through fractures and fissures in the rock, or directly from an outcrop of oil-bearing rock.
Petroleum seeps are quite common in many areas of the world, and have been exploited by humankind since paleolithic times. Natural products associated with these seeps include bitumen, pitch, asphalt and tar. In locations where seeps of natural gas are sufficiently large, natural "eternal flames" often persist. The occurrence of surface petroleum was often included in location names that developed; these locations are also associated with early oil and gas exploitation as well as scientific and technological developments, which have grown into the petroleum industry."
I tried to read this, but found that I grew dizzy from the spin about half way through. As near as I can tell, it had something to do with "black is white, and white is black"
Oh well.
I think you got dizzy because it was beyond your ability to understand why I brought up the factual information about natural oil seeps in contrast to his opinions which he has yet to elaborate. After that very post I wrote you that you misread badly, he vanished after being exposed by TNHarley so effectively for his poor answers to him.
Meanwhile you failed to realize that Confounding didn't even read the article well if at all since it wasn't even about drilling as TNHarley pointed out HERE at post 10.
I can understand your dizziness caused by your own spin on something you make clear you have no clue about,when you didn't pay attention to what TNharley, Confounding and Me were talking about.
Cheers.
You apparently have NO ability to mount a single argument on the topic at all. just your usual empty babble is the best you can dredge up.
Cheers.
No it isn't, you freak...these are scientific ideas....That's like saying, "Well everyone prefers flat chested women
No it isn't, you freak...these are scientific ideas....That's like saying, "Well everyone prefers flat chested women