Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
People can identify what they want to identify as, yes, SOME populace in South America will identify as white because of the German and Italian immigration that took place. BUT the majority of the populace are Mestizos, Zambos, Amerindians, Mulattoes, and Blacks.many Hispanics identify as White; especially in south America........because they ARE White or have white in them. cant they identify as who they want?
your example is if somebody asked people who may or may not be prone to violence and/or are ignorant, and DONT want to be thought of as white, because THEY ARENT, and might be offended at that?
you aren't saying anything genius
Hispanics or Mexicans???I think he's not just a populist, he's a racist. You can not say these things about hispanics or Mexicans, that is discriminatory.
Americans supporting awful politicians is nothing new. However one would think after all the lying, corruption, and dysfunction...and the tremendous increase in the central government's size and power, Americans would figure out the fraud being committed against them by their government...but sadly millions of Americans are nothing more than dupes.It is frightening that so many Americans are clueless. They have no idea how heinous and tyrannical the central government is becoming.You mean the one BERNIE SANDERS co-sponsored to leave in place?More of a fascist, all this talk of militarizing the border and making immigration enforcement far more strict and brutal is fraught with unintended consequences. They didn't learn in the aftermath of 9/11 that the government treating anything like a state of emergency is dangerous. How do you like our domestic spy network?And there it is: "You're a racist".You people would gladly allow any number of American doors kicked in just to get rid of the guy who cuts your grass.
Hopefully we'll see the end of this nasty and dishonest PC tactic before long.
.That idiot shill of the state?
Whatever Happened to NSA Reform?
Whatever Happened to NSA Reform Harvard Law and Policy Review
This lack of action is frustrating and bewildering, even with our historically do-nothing-Congress. While major issues like immigration have petered out largely because of partisan gridlock, NSA reform is distinctive in garnering strong support from both sides. In the House, the bill had 80 Democratic and 72 Republican cosponsors. In the Senate, the USA FREEDOM Act has the unique honor of having Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz as co-sponsors.
. . . and. . .
Civil liberties advocates
The final USA Freedom Act is perceived as containing several concessions to pro-surveillance legislators meant to facilitate its passage.[4][86] The watered down version of the USA Freedom Act that passed the House of Representatives in 2015 has been widely criticized by civil liberties advocates and its original supporters amongst house members for extending the Patriot Act Mass surveillance programs without meaningful restraints, undermining the original purpose of the bill. [87]
"This bill would make only incremental improvements, and at least one provision-the material-support provision-would represent a significant step backwards," ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer said in a statement. "The disclosures of the last two years make clear that we need wholesale reform." Jaffer wants Congress to let Section 215 sunset completely and wait for a better reform package than endorse something half-baked,[88] saying that "unless that bill is strengthened, sunset would be the better course."[89] The ACLU had previously written of the 2013 version that "although the USA Freedom Act does not fix every problem with the government's surveillance authorities and programs, it is an important first step and it deserves broad support."[90][91]
Representative Justin Amash, author of the narrowly defeated Amash Amendment, a proposal that would have de-funded the NSA bulk-collection program, backed the 2013 legislation, but not the final 2015 version.[92] "It's getting out of control," he commented. "[Courts are issuing] general warrants without specific cause...and you have one agency that's essentially having superpowers to pass information onto others".[15]
<snip>
Former whistleblowers
Former NSA crypto-mathematician William Binney, who worked three decades at the agency, says the Freedom Act – widely seen as having the best chance of any surveillance-limiting proposal – “won’t do anything” if it passes. “Why do you think NSA [and other intelligence agencies] support it?” he says.[10][10]
Drake, a former NSA senior executive prosecuted unsuccessfully under the Espionage Act before pleading guilty to a misdemeanor in 2011, calls the bill the “Free-dumb Act 2.0,” and says he sees it as a ploy by government officials “to keep the status quo in place.” He also says the fixation on the call record program in public debate is unfortunate, because NSA Internet surveillance is far broader and more invasive. “It’s a shiny, shiny bright spot, [but] there’s a whole lot more being collected,” he says, including a “staggering” amount of American communications. Drake believes support from the Obama administration for the Freedom Act is motivated in part by a desire to hobble lawsuits against the call record program, three of which are pending with appeals courts and may lay the groundwork for a major Supreme Court privacy ruling.[10]
Wiebe, formerly a senior analyst at the NSA, says the anticipated Freedom Act likely will be “more of the same” and is “not going to change anything” in a meaningful way. Like Drake, he has no hope for meaningful reform and doesn’t believe efforts to lobby Congress would work. “We’ve tried,” he says. “It makes no difference.” He believes well-funded government contractors and powerful, “co-opted” lawmakers who lead key committees make up a virtually unstoppable surveillance-industrial complex.[10]
USA Freedom Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's absolutely despicable how Sanders hollers at the top of his lungs in the media about how he voted against the Patriot act, and how he planned to vote against the Freedom Act. . . and then, behind the scenes, co-sponsored this draconian piece of shit.
Americans are so dumb.
Justin Amash is one of a few politicians who is trying to limit government power.
What's worse is they are supporting politicians they think have their back. I've been watching the "occupy" fellow all rabid in his support of Bernie, w/o a clue that Col. Sanders has been a D.C. insider for a quarter of a century. How does one seriously think he is going to shake things up? He's not. He's an establishment man.
I'm pretty sure Hillary asked him to run. He's there to motivate the young and the far left. If he wasn't running, the far left would be tuned out and uninterested in politics this time around.
You called itI think he's not just a populist, he's a racist. You can not say these things about hispanics or Mexicans, that is discriminatory.
You called itI think he's not just a populist, he's a racist. You can not say these things about hispanics or Mexicans, that is discriminatory.
You must live in a Shit Hole Country in a Shit Hole Community in a Shit Hole Public Housing Project.I think he's not just a populist, he's a racist. You can not say these things about hispanics or Mexicans, that is discriminatory.
You miss the good old days when you could be openly racist.You called itI think he's not just a populist, he's a racist. You can not say these things about hispanics or Mexicans, that is discriminatory.
Saying something negative about Mexicans is not discriminatory. Especially when you are talking about a specific subset of Mexicans, such as those who illegally invade your nation.
Unfairly smearing everyone you don't like, for saying something negative about a protected class, is one of the things tearing this nation apart.
I wouldn't refer to them as "the good old days" [and I don't think you should either] but what happens in a free country like ours when you are openly racist? and what happens to those who hide behind "freedom of speech" when what they really are is anti-American?You miss the good old days when you could be openly racist.
What happens to them?I wouldn't refer to them as "the good old days" [and I don't think you should either] but what happens in a free country like ours when you are openly racist? and what happens to those who hide behind "freedom of speech" when what they really are is anti-American?You miss the good old days when you could be openly racist.
lol...meh...sounded right right when I was thinking it, should have been something along the lines of "what about those who hide behind", etc. etc....nice catchWhat happens to them?
What happens to them?I wouldn't refer to them as "the good old days" [and I don't think you should either] but what happens in a free country like ours when you are openly racist? and what happens to those who hide behind "freedom of speech" when what they really are is anti-American?You miss the good old days when you could be openly racist.
Ask any republican politician what they think about trumps comments. Not one is saying their constituents agree with trump.Racist...racist...racist
Blah...blah...blah.
The country was doing great before trump and will be fine when he’s goneThe new Trump gossip of the day... Just like the Trump Russia hoax. How long will these unhinged lefties keep obstructing while the country is going great?
We don’t even have to fabricate anything trump creates the headlines.The new Trump gossip of the day... Just like the Trump Russia hoax. How long will these unhinged lefties keep obstructing while the country is going great?
been going great ever since ReaganThe country was doing great before trump and will be fine when he’s gone
