Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Now if you have an example of someone that spent their money to open a business THEN went out and tried to find customers, lets hear it.

Igor Sikorsky who designed and built the helicopter

Thomas Edison who successfully designed and created the lightbulb

The Wright Brothers who successfully designed and flew the first aircraft at Kitty Hawk

Do you think that they sent out fliers, posted ads, or slapped down a stack of questioners to hand out to get someone's "opinion" before they thought it was a good idea? Imagine if someone approached you with the idea they believe they could create a machine that can fly like a bird, during a time when no such concept existed. Another with an idea to produce light without the need of wick and a flame, a task which was performed by only the lamplighters at that time? They each sought out private investors and simply followed an idea with no guarantee it would ever work or how it could be built. After their success stories and hard work, do you think anyone wanted to jump on that band wagon later and make use of that invention? Did innovation built from a simple dream actually create an interest among the people with possibilities that were never seen before? Did that interest in turn CREATE demand and a desire to mass produce it, thereby creating jobs? Do you want to try and reinvent the wheel by saying a business or an individual with an idea, can't possibly find customers and create a demand that would require the hiring of more people to mass produce a product?

 

[OnePercenter]

Igor Sikorsky who designed and built the helicopter

Thomas Edison who successfully designed and created the lightbulb

The Wright Brothers who successfully designed and flew the first aircraft at Kitty Hawk

Do you think that they sent out fliers, posted ads, or slapped down a stack of questioners to hand out to get someone's "opinion" before they thought it was a good idea? Imagine if someone approached you with the idea they believe they could create a machine that can fly like a bird, during a time when no such concept existed. Another with an idea to produce light without the need of wick and a flame, a task which was performed by only the lamplighters at that time? They each sought out private investors and simply followed an idea with no guarantee it would ever work or how it could be built. After their success stories and hard work, do you think anyone wanted to jump on that band wagon later and make use of that invention? Did innovation built from a simple dream actually create an interest among the people with possibilities that were never seen before? Did that interest in turn CREATE demand and a desire to mass produce it, thereby creating jobs? Do you want to try and reinvent the wheel by saying a business or an individual with an idea, can't possibly find customers and create a demand that would require the hiring of more people to mass produce a product?

Sir Humphry Davy invented the light bulb.

 

[Mathbud1]

Can't be the employer's fault ... They don't do anything but collect the money from what you have been posting. It is the employe e's fault if they don't do what they are supposed to do. They creat the demand, the demand creates the jobs ... If the business fails the employees get themselves fired.

The employer does receive all of the money, but that doesn't relieve an employer from duties of an employer....unless you hire correctly.

Hold on now. Are you saying that demand is not the only thing needed for jobs to be created and stay around?

 

[OnePercenter]

Hold on now. Are you saying that demand is not the only thing needed for jobs to be created and stay around?

No.

 

[OnePercenter]

'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

 

[Mathbud1]

Hold on now. Are you saying that demand is not the only thing needed for jobs to be created and stay around?

No.

Oh. Sorry. I thought you might actually be making a bit of sense. My mistake.

 

[OnePercenter]

Oh. Sorry. I thought you might actually be making a bit of sense. My mistake.

Catch ya trying to be a deceptive Koch-rimmer didn't I?

 

[bripat9643]

Almost none of the ones who succeed have 5 years worth of expenses when they start.

But they do have access to 5 years capital.

ROFL! No they don't.

 

[bripat9643]

I understood your answer and asked you a question in return ... If you don't want to answer it just say so.

Employers direct employees. If a business fails because of employees it's the employers fail.

Can't be the employer's fault ... They don't do anything but collect the money from what you have been posting. It is the employe e's fault if they don't do what they are supposed to do. They creat the demand, the demand creates the jobs ... If the business fails the employees get themselves fired.

.

It's one of those "Heads I win. Tails you lose" deals. If the company makes money, it's all due to the employees, and they are entitled to all of it. If the company loses money, it's the employer's fault, and he deserves to suffer all the losses.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yes we are all aware of which thread we are in, and the fact that you still have trouble backing your argument.

 

[Judicial review]

Almost none of the ones who succeed have 5 years worth of expenses when they start.

But they do have access to 5 years capital.

ROFL! No they don't.

This guy actually believes this shit. Business owners only assets when they start out is their inventory. Period end of story. Explain to me how oh i dont know how a pizza oven and dough and toppings is equal to 5 years capital? Hell most new business owe a good 10,000 on their commercial lease when they start. That means they are in debt to begin with. Ever hear the saying starting up a business is risky? Moron.

 

[Judicial review]

I understood your answer and asked you a question in return ... If you don't want to answer it just say so.

Employers direct employees. If a business fails because of employees it's the employers fail.

Can't be the employer's fault ... They don't do anything but collect the money from what you have been posting. It is the employe e's fault if they don't do what they are supposed to do. They creat the demand, the demand creates the jobs ... If the business fails the employees get themselves fired.

.

It's one of those "Heads I win. Tails you lose" deals. If the company makes money, it's all due to the employees, and they are entitled to all of it. If the company loses money, it's the employer's fault, and he deserves to suffer all the losses.

Wtf? One question for you that will solve this disaster you just created witg this horrific frightning posts. Who hired and trained and managed these employees?

 

[The Rabbi]

'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Gee, who fills out the W2? Yeah, we get you dont know what you're talking about.

 

[OnePercenter]

ROFL! No they don't.

Name one that doesn't.

 

[OnePercenter]

It's one of those "Heads I win. Tails you lose" deals. If the company makes money, it's all due to the employees, and they are entitled to all of it. If the company loses money, it's the employer's fault, and he deserves to suffer all the losses.

Who says they're 'entitled to all of it?'

 

[OnePercenter]

Yes we are all aware of which thread we are in, and the fact that you still have trouble backing your argument.

Employers hire to service customers. If there is an upturn in customers employers hire more employees. The increase in customers created more jobs.

 

[Judicial review]

It's one of those "Heads I win. Tails you lose" deals. If the company makes money, it's all due to the employees, and they are entitled to all of it. If the company loses money, it's the employer's fault, and he deserves to suffer all the losses.

Who says they're 'entitled to all of it?'

We will take this slow....... who in the company has the sole power to determin the managers and employees pay? This should answer your idiotic question fyi.

 

[Judicial review]

[/QUOTE]onepercentor

Employers hire to service customers. If there is an upturn in customers employers hire more employees. The increase in customers created more jobs.[/QUOTE

No. You can have more revenue or more customers but that doesnt lways mean more jobs. Not if the money is coming in and going out to places like taxes, new office, upgrades in technology etc.. ill be your mentor kid.

 

[The Rabbi]

Yes we are all aware of which thread we are in, and the fact that you still have trouble backing your argument.

Employers hire to service customers. If there is an upturn in customers employers hire more employees. The increase in customers created more jobs.

Wrong, every sentence.
But at least you're admitting employers hire employees.

 

[Judicial review]

Yes we are all aware of which thread we are in, and the fact that you still have trouble backing your argument.

Employers hire to service customers. If there is an upturn in customers employers hire more employees. The increase in customers created more jobs.

Wrong, every sentence.
But at least you're admitting employers hire employees.

I love you! Finally someone with a fucking brain!!!!!!!!