If you blinked you probably missed Hussein signing an EXTENSION of VAWA (Violence Against Women Act). My guess is that the MSM is so ashamed of dear leader they wanted the story to go away so Americans would not be reminded of what the law contains.
Before getting to the meat and potatoes let me offer Jack Minors guideline:
Next
The Violence Against Women Act is NOT like Pelosis Affordable Care Act:
The VAWA is has been around a long time; so nobody who voted for it can say they did not know what was in it. Just about every piece of big name Democrat garbage has been associated with it. Then-Senator Biden drafted the bill and Clinton signed it. For years, everybody who pays attention knew what was in it.
In 2000 the Supreme Court struck down part of the law, but left VAWAs program funding intact supporting my contention that the High Court will never, never, never, strike down a law that reduces the governments income. (Funding starts with collecting taxes.) On top of justification for funding only fools believe the Nifty Nine will ever chop off a powerful arm of the parasite class.
For years, Phyllis Schlafly has been exposing the VAWA for the fraud it is. A few days ago she said this about the very VAWA funding the High Court let stand:
You can bet your ass sequestration will not touch funding. If VAWA is touched at all the reduction wont amount to more than two or three million dollars. Worse still, not one parasite is going to get bounced out of the public purse.
NOTE: Your tax dollars fund political causes you might NOT believe in. To me, thats no different than forcing me to support a religion not of my choosing.
Whats next?
With so many Republicans rolling over for VAWA there is a real fear the Senate will ratify CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women). Jimmy Carter signed CEDAW in 1980 before many of todays adult Americans were born, but it was never ratified.
UN treaties never die; so there is a good chance Hussein will bring it up again. Sixty-seven votes are needed to ratify. Even if establishment Republicans get control of the Senate in 2014 there is a good chance enough RINO will join with Democrats and ratify. I base my opinion on the number of Republicans who voted for an extension of VAWA. House Republicans could have stopped it but they didnt.
Heres the link to Jack Minors great piece for those who are not up to snuff on VAWA:
Before getting to the meat and potatoes let me offer Jack Minors guideline:
The renewal of the Violence Against Women Act sounds noble enough based on the title of the bill. However an actual reading of the bill reveals its truth.
Next
The Violence Against Women Act is NOT like Pelosis Affordable Care Act:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU&feature=player_detailpage]Pelosi: "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It" - YouTube[/ame]
The VAWA is has been around a long time; so nobody who voted for it can say they did not know what was in it. Just about every piece of big name Democrat garbage has been associated with it. Then-Senator Biden drafted the bill and Clinton signed it. For years, everybody who pays attention knew what was in it.
In 2000 the Supreme Court struck down part of the law, but left VAWAs program funding intact supporting my contention that the High Court will never, never, never, strike down a law that reduces the governments income. (Funding starts with collecting taxes.) On top of justification for funding only fools believe the Nifty Nine will ever chop off a powerful arm of the parasite class.
For years, Phyllis Schlafly has been exposing the VAWA for the fraud it is. A few days ago she said this about the very VAWA funding the High Court let stand:
"In its 17 years of operation," Phyllis Schlafly explains, VAWA "has done little or no good for real victims of domestic violence, while its funds have been used to fill feminist coffers and to lobby for feminist objectives and laws. Although every spending bill should be subject to rigorous auditing procedures in order to curb waste and fraud, VAWA has somehow ducked accountability for the [$660 million] a year it doles out to radical feminist organizations."
Phyllis Schlafly Says Violence Against Women Act Promotes Divorce And Hatred of Men
By Sam Levin
Published Thu., Feb. 7 2013 at 1:20 PM
Phyllis Schlafly Says Violence Against Women Act Promotes Divorce And Hatred of Men - St. Louis - News - Daily RFT
You can bet your ass sequestration will not touch funding. If VAWA is touched at all the reduction wont amount to more than two or three million dollars. Worse still, not one parasite is going to get bounced out of the public purse.
NOTE: Your tax dollars fund political causes you might NOT believe in. To me, thats no different than forcing me to support a religion not of my choosing.
Whats next?
With so many Republicans rolling over for VAWA there is a real fear the Senate will ratify CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women). Jimmy Carter signed CEDAW in 1980 before many of todays adult Americans were born, but it was never ratified.
UN treaties never die; so there is a good chance Hussein will bring it up again. Sixty-seven votes are needed to ratify. Even if establishment Republicans get control of the Senate in 2014 there is a good chance enough RINO will join with Democrats and ratify. I base my opinion on the number of Republicans who voted for an extension of VAWA. House Republicans could have stopped it but they didnt.
Heres the link to Jack Minors great piece for those who are not up to snuff on VAWA:
Conservative icon blasts GOP as cowards
Schlafly says Republicans 'afraid of the feminist lobby'
Published: 19 hours ago
by JACK MINOR
Conservative icon blasts GOP as cowards