Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
justthenews.com
I’m not sure what exactly you’re quoting.The "press release accusing?" I sure would like to read that. . . but for some reson, my ISP won't resolve. I wonder if that is just for me, or if that happens to everyone? I looked in the wayback, there are no image captures.
View attachment 740170
This is the link;
News Item | Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence
republicans-intelligence.house.gov
View attachment 740171
The article you linked, press the "dig in" part, on that page.I’m not sure what exactly you’re quoting.
Thanks, that paper letter probably already hit the shredders. Good it is preserved. Keep it away from 'bleach bit' Hillary.
No, the key here, was "document ID 1125"
Hat tip to your sleuthing skills!No, the key here, was "document ID 1125"
Here is the original link (minus the https://)
republicans-intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1125)
I went to see if someone had created an image in the Wayback, they did not, then, I went to see, if someone had bookmarked "documentID # 1125 in republicans-intelligence.house.gov/news. . . AND?
THEY HAD.
I do find this a lot in some gov. documents on the web. Folks in the bureaucracy make information, and then weeks or months later, move it all around so no one can ever find it again. The tin foil hatter in me, believes it is so the public and investigative journalists can't either follow what is going on, or PROVE IT LATER.
Here is what I came up with from the WayBack. This is the link, minus the https:// (It would seem, the only difference was the addition of that right Bracket ")" at the end. )
republicans-intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1125
Here is the Wayback link;
View attachment 740243
I can potentially see why it was buried. Even now, when you go back and look for the media reports that were based on it, there aren't many.Hat tip to your sleuthing skills!
www.washingtontimes.com
wanting to silence dissent would be.......?????But let’s get real. They wanted more.
I can potentially see why it was buried. Even now, when you go back and look for the media reports that were based on it, there aren't many.
House Intel chairman threatens FBI director, deputy AG with contempt of Congress
Chairman Devin Nunes says FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein have been hiding information from Congress.www.usatoday.com
House intel committee threatens DOJ, FBI with contempt of Congress
House Republicans could draft a resolution to hold Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress as early as Monday.
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Obviously you aren’t familiar with the reputation of Mr. Solomon.Maybe there isn't much out there because isn't much period?
Just The News – Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
Maybe there isn't much out there because isn't much period?
Just The News – Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
In your opinion.Why do you let other people decide for you what is or isn't biased? Maybe a good idea would be to decide for yourself by reading articles on those sites.
You and I got into it with this site in the J6 threads, you and others argued incessantly that Solomon was biased, yet every article he posted was backed up totally by sourced, documented information.
I guess Lot's wife made an irreversible impression on you and your friends minds.
So tell me, Solomon, using documented US Gov't reports, regarding what happened, J6, is biased?In your opinion.
If I think something sounds biased,as in “too good to be true” for one side or tbe other, or has red flag language, I look it up. Frankly…you guys routinely disparaging “leftist” sources, so why the upset?
