Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Why do you think you know the law better than the AG's office?Nope. Quit lying.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
fact is he doesn't have to do shit. sit on that egg for awhile.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Nope. Quit lying.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
Good of you to admit your partisan bigotry.You’re likely correct.Whatever it is, you won't be satisfied.
then why are you posting stuff you haven't seen yet? are you gaslighting?I did - it was another example of your usual bigoted, hyper-partisan partisan ignorance.Did you read my post? Do so and get back to us. Thanks.Did you read the OP?Looks like the Democrats are going to have a great political football in the upcoming election if the report is not released.
No?
Do that, and get back to us.
Thanks.
See, had you read the OP, you'd recognize that the report will, indeed, be released.
We’ll see what happens.
theres going to be a shitload of RW Tards eating a shitload of crow sooner than later ..
Didn't you say the very same thing last fall saying Just wait until Mueller releases his investigation?
not forming opinions until the investigation is over is just about all I've been saying since day 1 - but look at Trump and his drones ... 30 seconds after Mueller turned over his findings to Barr, Goldilocks started slobbering how he was totally in the clear and his drones bought it - that bring us back to square 1.
It aint fucking over until its over !
By all means eat crow and have a foot for desert.
then why are you posting stuff you haven't seen yet? are you gaslighting?I did - it was another example of your usual bigoted, hyper-partisan partisan ignorance.Did you read my post? Do so and get back to us. Thanks.Did you read the OP?
No?
Do that, and get back to us.
Thanks.
See, had you read the OP, you'd recognize that the report will, indeed, be released.
We’ll see what happens.
What am I posting?
Difference is, of course, you admit yours (as above) and mine does not exist.Shameful of you to deny yours if that is the way you want to go with this.Good of you to admit your partisan bigotry.You’re likely correct.Whatever it is, you won't be satisfied.
as soon as the left tells you what to think, youll be set.Release the report in full to Congress and I'll accept whatever it says.
I couldn't be any clearer about that
So Barr was lying about that too?theres going to be a shitload of RW Tards eating a shitload of crow sooner than later ..
Didn't you say the very same thing last fall saying Just wait until Mueller releases his investigation?
not forming opinions until the investigation is over is just about all I've been saying since day 1 - but look at Trump and his drones ... 30 seconds after Mueller turned over his findings to Barr, Goldilocks started slobbering how he was totally in the clear and his drones bought it - that bring us back to square 1.
It aint fucking over until its over !
By all means eat crow and have a foot for desert.
Bad news champ, the investigation is over. Mueller went home.
He has to honor subpoenasfact is he doesn't have to do shit. sit on that egg for awhile.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Nope. Quit lying.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
Except when said subpoena violates the law, such as this one.He has to honor subpoenasfact is he doesn't have to do shit. sit on that egg for awhile.Nope. Quit lying.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
After his bullshit claims about Obstruction maybe I do. You know he was absolutely wrong about that.. correct?Why do you think you know the law better than the AG's office?Nope. Quit lying.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
I’m what way? Let’s hear this lie. ThanksExcept when said subpoena violates the law, such as this one.He has to honor subpoenasfact is he doesn't have to do shit. sit on that egg for awhile.Nope. Quit lying.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
You don't. You speak wholly from ignorance. As usual.After his bullshit claims about Obstruction maybe I do.Why do you think you know the law better than the AG's office?
This has been explained to you umpteen times - your partisan bigotry refuses to let you understand.I’m what way? Let’s hear this lie. ThanksExcept when said subpoena violates the law, such as this one.He has to honor subpoenasfact is he doesn't have to do shit. sit on that egg for awhile.Nope. Quit lying.he will, once he redacts the material that he has to follow law on. are you for him breaking the law? wow.
Barr has claimed 4 different things he would base redactions on and only ONE has legal standing. The Grand Jury. And THAT could be released by that judge upon request as was done in Watergate
You keep lying...I'll keep pointing out the facts.
Everyone knows this.If every single page of the Mueller report was made public with zero redactions and it said no collusion or obstruction of justice the left still wouldn’t accept it.
Why do you think you know the law better than the AG's office?Hey idiot. Barr claimed that Obstruction can’t be prosecuted unless the underlying crime is prosecuted. That’s complete bullshit which I’m sure you stupidly believe
